PAK-US TIES: Parliament approves PCNS recommendations

[VCheng]

The nation expected that something new, something credible will come out, something bold and clear, but hey, it's same old same old.

There were alot of hidden factors in this , like maulana sahib, who might have gotten something but the kind of U-turn he made was amazing.

Then there is a resolution which says that no weapons will go through the NATO supplies, who is going to check it?

And the stupid point that the US agents are kicked out of Pak and US be not allowed to station them here, well hello Sherlock, no country takes permission to station intelligence agents!!!

Now you may see yet another reason I am so cynical when all these false hopes are raised by those who continue to mislead the whole country.

 

[SamranAli]

like all previous resolutions this will also go to dustbin with resuming the supply line. All parties hav got dollers and the term is ending this year so they are relaxed and enjoying.

 

[VCheng]

Well, he seems pretty satisfied; I wonder why?

=======================================

from: Parliament’s guidelines set new foundation for foreign policy: Fazl | DAWN.COM

ISLAMABAD: Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman on Friday said that the parliament had set new foundation for independent foreign policy to safeguard national interests and sovereignty.

Speaking to media representatives, he said the JUI-F has played important role in omitting objectionable recommendations of the Parliamentary Committee on National Security (PCNS).

Fazlur Rehman said that imported foreign policies were implemented in the past but now for the first time the parliament had given guidelines for chalking out a foreign policy reflecting aspiration of people of the country.

He said now Pakistani territory would not be used for transportation of arms and ammunition, adding it was his party’s recommendations that no private security contractors and intelligence operatives would be allowed to operate in the Pakistani territory.

He said the JUI-F would resist if the authorities did not implement parliament’s guidelines in letter and spirit.

 

[Respect4Respect01]

thats what they say every time, mutual respect and crap etc....

 

[DANGER-ZONE]

finally eunuch government of Pakistan growing some balls and the credit goes to Rabbani Khar.

She is puppet like other parliamentarians / GOVT. people.
What makes her a little different from other is her beauty.
Other wise all her BAYANATS are properly written dialogues.

 

[Jango]

Well, he seems pretty satisfied; I wonder why?

=======================================

from: Parliament’s guidelines set new foundation for foreign policy: Fazl | DAWN.COM

ISLAMABAD: Jamiat Ulema-i-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman on Friday said that the parliament had set new foundation for independent foreign policy to safeguard national interests and sovereignty.

Speaking to media representatives, he said the JUI-F has played important role in omitting objectionable recommendations of the Parliamentary Committee on National Security (PCNS).

Fazlur Rehman said that imported foreign policies were implemented in the past but now for the first time the parliament had given guidelines for chalking out a foreign policy reflecting aspiration of people of the country.

He said now Pakistani territory would not be used for transportation of arms and ammunition, adding it was his party’s recommendations that no private security contractors and intelligence operatives would be allowed to operate in the Pakistani territory.

He said the JUI-F would resist if the authorities did not implement parliament’s guidelines in letter and spirit.

This Maulana is the definition of a lota.

Lethal or non-lethal aid, what difference does it make to us? Supplies are going through Pakistan, lethal or non-lethal, same thing, it only matters to NATO.

maulana is going take the applauds that he was the one who made this lethal, non-lethal thing possible. Well , I would like to ask, how would you check the An-124's and C-5's passing overhead you , while coming from Qatar, to check whether they are lethal or non-lethal cargo inside?

How would you check thousands of trucks?

As for the underlined part, well maulana ji, nobody asks you before bringing in a CIA agent!!!

The only way to ensure the eviction of CIA agents is to cancel all american visas, and issue them after a new background check/ purpose of visit. Or else, nobody is gonna voluntarily come and say hey, we are CIA agents, and we are going home!

In the end, the decision on Foreign policy is of the government, foreign policy is never a thing for the parliament.

BTW, there used to be a CIA guy the foreign departures in Islamabad airport (near the check-in counters), is he still there?

 

[VCheng]

............
In the end, the decision on Foreign policy is of the government, foreign policy is never a thing for the parliament..........

Then why go through all this circus of a PCNS review?

 

[Jango]

Then why go through all this circus of a PCNS review?

As I said, to fire the gun off of somebody else's shoulder.

A hogwash!!!

 

[VCheng]

As I said, to fire the gun off of somebody else's shoulder.

A hogwash!!!

Well, the real damage is to the State of Pakistan. How can such a juvenile circus be regarded as a responsible nuclear power?

 

[Donatello]

Well, the real damage is to the State of Pakistan. How can such a juvenile circus be regarded as a responsible nuclear power?

Thank god the nukes are not in the hands of these lunatics!!

 

[VCheng]

Thank god the nukes are not in the hands of these lunatics!!

The problem is that the rest of the world does not differentiate between the military and the rest of the power structures, to them it is all one country: Pakistan.

Therefore, it becomes easy for the international media to portray the entire country as "lunatics with nukes", with constant goading from a few interested parties.

In the long run, such a perception is not good for Pakistan.

 

[Jango]

The problem is that the rest of the world does not differentiate between the military and the rest of the power structures, to them it is all one country: Pakistan.

Therefore, it becomes easy for the international media to portray the entire country as "lunatics with nukes", with constant goading from a few interested parties.

In the long run, such a perception is not good for Pakistan.

The rest of the world should then be more flexible in it's views.

Rather than being the self appointed jail warden, US should be accommodating of the views of other people.

 

[jahangeer yousaf]

Shahid Naama - 13th April 2012


here it goes

 

[VCheng]

The rest of the world should then be more flexible in it's views.

Rather than being the self appointed jail warden, US should be accommodating of the views of other people.

There "should" be a lot of things, but often aren't.

 

[Jango]

There "should" be a lot of things, but often aren't.

The sad reality.