What's new

Pak. loses 7 billion by avoiding India goods

my2cents

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Apr 8, 2011
Messages
5,637
Reaction score
-9
Country
India
Location
United States
Pak. loses $7 bn. by avoiding India goods
ARUN S

TH29_BU_LOC_TRADE_3026509f.jpg


Pakistan suffered a loss of about $7 billion in 2014 by importing items from other countries at a higher cost instead of sourcing them from India, according to a study by the New Delhi-based Research and Information System for Developing Countries (RIS).

The think-tank in the study, to be released this week, found out that the loss was substantial considering Pakistan’s GDP (nominal, 2015) was only about $270 billion. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is slated to chair a meeting to review trade ties between India and Pakistan on Thursday.

Significantly, the RIS study’s findings are in line with the theme of Modi’s recent speech at Kozhikode (Kerala), where he called upon the people of Pakistan to fight a war on unemployment, poverty and illiteracy.

The RIS study — on ‘Costs of Non-Cooperation’ — covered 5,200 items. These included refined petroleum, palm oil, aviation spirit, motor vehicle parts, edible oil, cotton, milk powder, marine products, machinery as well as chemicals and allied products.

‘Costs of Non-Cooperation’ occurs when a country imports from the global market at prices higher than the price at which the same product is available from the regional market, and thereby incurs an additional foreign exchange expenditure on such imports, the RIS said.


Many products that Pakistan imported from third countries were at least three times more costly than the price of the same item from India in export markets, it added.

“The objective of the study is to show Pakistan that they can save on the foreign exchange front if they cooperate in South Asia,” said Ram Upendra Das, professor, RIS.

Pakistan is a net-importing nation with a trade deficit of $22 billion in 2015. In 2015, it imported around $44 billion, while it exported only items worth $22 billion. India-Pakistan trade is far below potential and negligible.

Trade between both the nations in 2015-16 was just $2.6 billion, while according to various estimates the annual bilateral trade has the potential to surpass $20 billion if both countries cooperate and remove barriers and restrictions. Currently, most of the trade happens indirectly through Dubai, Singapore, port of Bandar Abbas (Iran).

Keywords: India-Pakistan trade ties, MFN Status, Pakistan economy


http://www.thehindu.com/business/Economy/pak-loses-7-bn-by-avoiding-india-goods/article9159274.ece
 
. .
Pakistan does not feel this loss of 7 Billion. Give this trade to Pakistan for 6 months then take it away.

Lets send these goods to Pakistan through Afghanistan. Afghans will get leverage over Pakistan.
 
. . . .
I would take indian news sources with a pinch of a salt.

But you agree that the trade is lopsided in our favor in spite of India granting MFN to Pakistan. It shows that our products can compete in your market- some of which is rerouted via Dubia incurring additional costs. If you guys were to remove your negative list which you maintain wrt to India then it will cost less to import directly and sell more in your market.
 
.
But you agree that the trade is lopsided in our favor in spite of India granting MFN to Pakistan. It shows that our products can compete in your market- some of which is rerouted via Dubia incurring additional costs. If you guys were to remove your negative list which you maintain wrt to India then it will cost less to import directly and sell more in your market.

Higher prices mean less demand hence a negative list is more preferable for Pakistan. We cant flood our market with low quality products just to have cheap prices for sake of short term benefits.
 
. . .
If nobody cares; is there any need to start such useless thread?

In reality, those who started they much feel it and care. :D
 
. . .
Worth it. European Union could save $100 billion if it imported freely from Third World. It does not and ends up making the poor consumer in Europe pay extra because of it's racist geopolitics.

If had had any influence I would add extra 25% to trade from UAE excluding oils. That would kill any Indian imports which are organized by the Karachi cross border mafia.

And the best, I mean the best exta regional trading body in our region was made by British and it was called "British Raj". Why did Burma, Pak, India break it up for in 1947? If everything was about trade only?

eastindia.jpg



Ps. And if Dubai can't be blocked then I would open Wagah up so that the monoploy enjoyed by certain vested groups in Karachi is busted.
 
Last edited:
.
Higher prices mean less demand hence a negative list is more preferable for Pakistan. We cant flood our market with low quality products just to have cheap prices for sake of short term benefits.

Sure, but that should be left to customers to decide. I may decide to use a cheap detergent for my clothes and an expensive soap for my body. So, who is to decide what is right for me. It should not be left for the government unless it has some safety issues. Anyways the article hints at how our two countries are squandering our potential to increase our bilateral trade to some 20 billion dollars.

Well, see it as 7 Billion dollars loss of India. Suck it..

That amount is what is over charged to your consumers. It is your people who got a sucky deal.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom