Thats y u were awarded negative rating for your so much regular comment .
Not Admitted, You need to know the context of posts, rather to blame on everything.
More on post, Needs to see this Article why India needs to worry about the Nuclear Arsenals, In Pakistan (Not with Pakistan)
http://globalsecuritystudies.com/Diaz Pak Nuclear.pdf
The influence of Islamist sentiment within the key sectors of Pakistan society increases the vulnerabilities of the nuclear arsenals.
Discussed above are the relationships amongst Pakistan’s ISI, military, and terrorist organizations. Undeniably, if Pakistan were to experience a period of social instability, these keys sectors would likely support terrorist initiatives to pursue radical Islamist goals. (page-9 pdf)
When world have such apprehension, I yet say Nothing to Negative Ratings for such, its seems baseless.
It Might be possible that, Pakistani Members over here Might be Justify their Nuclear Arsenals, as said by Pakistan that its in safe and secure custody, and Need to Control any Indian Agression; Even admit such fact that such arsenals are to control any agressive action from India, Irrespective of that, the Possible use of such weapons against India, or reaching of such weapons In the Terrorist Groups are Extremely Dangerous. The Self Respect or Credit of Pakistan Militery and ISI has been hurt, or if any time go down or they feel such; it will not easy to judge to condition of any conflict or War between two contries.
Taliban threat: Nuclear site in DG Khan cordoned off – The Express Tribune
Threat of nuclear war
President Musharraf refused to renounce the
use of
nuclear weapons even after pressure by the
international community. Whereas
Prime Minister Vajpayee asserted from the beginning that nuclear weapons would only be used if the other side used them first.
As both
India and
Pakistan are armed with nuclear weapons, the possibility a
conventional war could escalate into a
nuclear one was raised several times during the standoff. Various statements on this subject were made by Indian and Pakistani officials during the conflict, mainly concerning a
no first use policy. Indian
External Affairs Minister Jaswant Singh said on 5 June that India would not use nuclear weapons first,
[27] while Musharraf said on 5 June he would not renounce Pakistan's right to use nuclear weapons first.
[28] According to one think tank of the Pakistan government, the possession of nuclear weapons by Pakistan prevented escalation to an all out war by India.
[29][
unreliable source?] In 2009, Pakistani economist
Sartaj Aziz asserted that:
It was a big upset about what happened to the economy after the
[atomic] tests in 1998, but was consoled that in 2002, when India mobilized half a million
troops on the
border after an attack on
its parliament in 2001, but was finally forced to withdraw the "due to the
danger of a
nuclear retaliation by Pakistan....
—Sartaj Aziz, defending Pakistan's decision to tests its nuclear capability in 1998, [30]
There was also concern that a 6 June 2002
asteroid explosion over Earth, known as the
Eastern Mediterranean Event, could have caused a nuclear conflict had it exploded over India or Pakistan.
2001–02 India–Pakistan standoff - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Militants attack Pakistan nuclear air base - Telegraph