PAF locked on 9 shoot only two...PAF official....0n 27 Feb....

[StormBreaker]

sometime it becomes a requirement ...a necessity... specially when all members pretend to be war experts

Expressing views is more enjoyable as compared to controlling the expressed views

 

[RoshiniVenegal]

Proofs, pentagon deny it and its technically impossible to shoot down our F-16 by your upgraded Mig-21, you upgraded Mig-21 can't fire BVR (BEYOND VISUAL RANGE AIR TO AIR MISSILE) because of radar ranges, your all COM and equipment were jammed by our ECM aircraft (DA-20 Falcon)

Oh god, I said 'seems', Mig 21 was in visual range of f16 as in radar, but I am not saying mig 21 shot it down. People on ground and ISPR and IAF all said of multiple pilots landing in Azad Kashmir. Later only 1 pilot remained. You can argue that Ispr made a mistake, but from all his tweets and talk in media, indeed their were more than 1 pilot in Pakistan custody.

 

[Sulemanms202]

on your own convenience you are ready to accept what ISPR says by the same rule why not agree with everything what ISPR saya han?!

very shallow thought process!

ISPR said this ...ISPR said that..my sweet a$$!

 

[RoshiniVenegal]

on your own convenience you are ready to accept what ISPR says by the same rule why not agree with everything what ISPR saya han?!

very shallow thought process!

ISPR said this ...ISPR said that..my sweet a$$!

One can easily make out from what he initially said to what he said on course of events and after the event to see if he lied or not.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Oh god, I said 'seems', Mig 21 was in visual range of f16 as in radar, but I am not saying mig 21 shot it down. People on ground and ISPR and IAF all said of multiple pilots landing in Azad Kashmir. Later only 1 pilot remained. You can argue that Ispr made a mistake, but from all his tweets and talk in media, indeed their were more than 1 pilot in Pakistan custody.

so how can it be shot down you had no BVR that comparable range of our AMRAAM, and as per IAF Abhi shot down our F-16 with R-73, may be he was confused because same news coming from multiple sources or your one MKI pilots ejected over our part of Kashmir ( injured and captured by Pakistani military) while your MKI were on the way to retreat after being hit by AMRAAM

One can easily make out from what he initially said to what he said on course of events and after the event to see if he lied or not.

You're trolling, this is debunk already to death

 

[NA71]

Oh god, I said 'seems', Mig 21 was in visual range of f16 as in radar, but I am not saying mig 21 shot it down. People on ground and ISPR and IAF all said of multiple pilots landing in Azad Kashmir. Later only 1 pilot remained. You can argue that Ispr made a mistake, but from all his tweets and talk in media, indeed their were more than 1 pilot in Pakistan custody.

Bhai jan ...why are you bothering here let us enjoy 27/2....we are not gonna take your argument...we are tun party.
Aik tha ya do...I don't know ...but we shared one cup of fantastic tea...for sure.

 

[SIPRA]

You're trolling, this is debunk already to death

He is not a new PDF member, but some old Indian poster, who after being banned, has come up with new ID.

 

[Adios Amigo]

seedhi baat kar raha hon. jang jisne cheri thi usper zimedari ati ke 9 gire ya 100. roz nama jang akhbaar nahi horahi thi. proper jang horahi thi. ulta ek aur qarz barha liya hai kay wo proper territory me aye or ham sirf jammu tak rahe. ab ye qarz bhi utaro imf ke qarz bhi utaro. duniya ko valima party samjha hua hai

PAF actions may have been aggressive but the country was fighting a defensive war throughout that conflict.

yahi tu masala hy k apko jang ka pata hi nahi.... jang ho nahi rahi thi bulkay honay wali thi .... ap pay thompi ja rahi thi.....aur hum us say har sorat us say bachna chah rahay thay..... ab ye bat samjhana kuch logon k liye namumkin hy...
rahi bat qaraz ki .... tu sood samat chukta kar diya....

 

[Windjammer]

One can easily make out from what he initially said to what he said on course of events and after the event to see if he lied or not.

Is it too difficult for you to understand that DG ISPR wasn't reporting from ground zero himself, he was being fed news from various sources which he duly described in a later press brief.
Imagine a person gets shot in the leg, one source reports it as being shot, another mentions shot in the right leg yet another may report it as being shot in the left thigh.

 

[El Sidd]

yahi tu masala hy k apko jang ka pata hi nahi.... jang ho nahi rahi thi bulkay honay wali thi .... ap pay thompi ja rahi thi.....aur hum usko har sorat us say bachna chah rahay thay..... ab ye bat samjhana kuch logon k liye namumkin hy...
rahi bat qaraz ki .... tu sood samat chukta kar diya....

sood haram hai boss. esa na karna.

han to Pakistan ne kab mana kiya hai India se jang ka? 4 saal se fauj khud keh rahi hai hum tayyar hain hum tayyar hain phir ye psycho pm agaya jo kehta hai paise lelo bank se per jang ka na bolo.

khair kab tak oonth pahar ke nechay sastaega. hona jo hai wo ho kar rehega

 

[SIPRA]

Is it too difficult for you to understand that DG ISPR wasn't reporting from ground zero himself, he was being fed news from various sources which he duly described in a later press brief.
Imagine a person gets shot in the leg, one source reports it as being shot, another mentions shot in the right leg yet another may report it as being shot in the left thigh.

He is a confirmed troll.

 

[RoshiniVenegal]

Bhai jan ...why are you bothering here let us enjoy 27/2....we are not gonna take your argument...we are tun party.
Aik tha ya do...I don't know ...but we shared one cup of fantastic tea...for sure.

It is expected , but thought someone will try finding truth, enjoy your 27th until--

 

[Windjammer]

He is a confirmed troll.

Yes, three years after joining, suddenly gets a brainstorm and starts posting.

 

[The Eagle]

manners...? every other day and every other post is full of personal attacks and it goes on for years, which confirms official sponsors of those personal attacks on me are you moderator team.

Wrong sponsorship given the pretext of history of a member. Well, do report and that can help unless one wants to claim it right for himself while others are wrong. For moderators, both are wrong in the end. Just pick your interest to move on.

You as well suppress opinion and promote base less allegations.

Well, you can do better as I always hoped. Try to be something worthy to talk about. If you have anything, bring it all with evidences & links to the posts. Just because you don't like something on personal grounds for whatever your own reasons; doesn't mean what you say is considerable and worthy. Before you level allegations; lest consider the fact to prove something unlike useless rants. You can have all the following if you can post a bit with quality, manners, civility & in-fact unbiased. I will be waiting for you to prove what you just throw or try not to call for it at all.

Regards,

 

[NA71]

It is expected , but thought someone will try finding truth, enjoy your 27th until--

Yeh to hoga.....