What's new

Oprah Winfrey 'actively thinking' about running for president

F-22Raptor

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jun 19, 2014
Messages
16,980
Reaction score
3
Country
United States
Location
United States
Oprah Winfrey is "actively thinking" about running for president, two of her close friends told CNN Monday.

The two friends, who requested anonymity in order to speak freely, talked in the wake of Winfrey's extraordinary speech at the Golden Globes Sunday night, which spurred chatter about a 2020 run.

Some of Winfrey's confidants have been privately urging her to run, the sources said.

One of the sources said these conversations date back several months. The person emphasized that Winfrey has not made up her mind about running.

A representative for Winfrey did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Democratic race for president won't officially begin until after the 2018 midterms, but many potential candidates are already jostling for position and making trips to Iowa.

"President Winfrey" was the talk of the entertainment world after Winfrey accepted the Cecil B. DeMille Award at the Golden Globes. And the "Oprah for president?" possibility was a top story on morning TV.

The touchstone of her speech was the #MeToo movement. But her hopeful message -- "A new day is on the horizon" -- could have doubled as a campaign rallying cry.

Many liberal-leaning celebrities and viewers certainly heard it that way. And that may have been exactly what Winfrey wanted.

As some political strategists have pointed out in the past year, her fame and wealth could make her a formidable Democratic Party candidate. But insiders have their doubts too: Would Americans really choose a TV star as president twice in a row?

For now, it's all just talk. But her fans demonstrated a lot of wishful thinking on Twitter and Facebook after her speech.

Although Winfrey has deflected questions about a presidential run in the past, she has also acknowledged that President Trump's election upended assumptions about how to pursue political office.

After the speech, Winfrey's longtime partner Stedman Graham was quoted saying a run is certainly a possibility.

"It's up to the people," Graham told a Los Angeles Times reporter. "She would absolutely do it."

Winfrey campaigned for Barack Obama in 2008 and endorsed Hillary Clinton in 2016. During Clinton's campaign, she discussed the prospect of a female president and said "America, it's about time that we made that decision."

She said it would be a "seminal moment for women." But the moment has yet to happen -- which is one of the reasons Sunday's speech stirred so much attention.

Winfrey has deep pockets, an even deeper well of charisma, and instant name recognition, thanks to decades on "The Oprah Winfrey Show."

Reese Witherspoon alluded to her friend's superstar status while introducing her at the Globes: "There's only one person whose name is a verb, an adjective, and a feeling. And that is Oprah."

What she lacks is political experience.

In an interview with Winfrey on Bloomberg last March, interviewer David Rubenstein broached the possibility, saying "It's clear you don't need government experience to be elected president of the United States."

She indicated that the same thought had crossed her mind after Trump's election: "I thought, 'Oh gee, I don't have the experience, I don't know enough.' And now I'm thinking, 'Oh. Oh!'"

Winfrey laughed while the studio audience applauded.

More recently, when her best friend Gayle King brought up the idea on "CBS This Morning," Winfrey shot it down: "There will be no running for office of any kind for me."

Right now Winfrey has multiple jobs: She's the CEO of the cable channel OWN, a "special correspondent" for the CBS newsmagazine "60 Minutes" and an investor in companies like Weight Watchers.

She recently sold part of her stake in OWN but renewed her contract to remain CEO through 2025.

Her role at CBS News would conflict with any serious exploration of a presidential run.

Winfrey's next role is in Ava DuVernay's movie "A Wrinkle in Time," which comes out in April.

The political back-and-forth has already begun. On Sunday night Winfrey's detractors immediately began circulating an old photo of Winfrey with Harvey Weinstein, the disgraced movie mogul who has become the symbol of Hollywood rot.

But her fans portrayed her as the perfect anti-Trump candidate -- that is, if she's willing to run. Videos and transcripts of the speech were widely shared on social media on Monday morning.

The Washington Post quoted Meryl Streep saying that Winfrey "launched a rocket" with the speech.

"I want her to run for president," Streep told The Post. "I don't think she had any intention [of declaring]. But now she doesn't have a choice."

Earlier in the evening, Globes host Seth Meyers actually teed up the speculation.

"Oprah," Meyers said, looking out at her in the audience, "in 2011, I told some jokes about our current president at the White House Correspondents Dinner -- jokes about how he was unqualified to be president -- and some have said that night convinced him to run. So if that's true, I just want to say: Oprah, you will never be president! You do not have what it takes!"

The laughs and cheers from the crowd made it clear: Winfrey would have a lot of supporters in the entertainment industry.

http://money.cnn.com/2018/01/08/media/oprah-golden-globes/index.html
 
.
Oprah Winfrey is "actively thinking" about running for president, two of her close friends told CNN Monday.

The two friends, who requested anonymity in order to speak freely, talked in the wake of Winfrey's extraordinary speech at the Golden Globes Sunday night, which spurred chatter about a 2020 run.

Some of Winfrey's confidants have been privately urging her to run, the sources said.

One of the sources said these conversations date back several months. The person emphasized that Winfrey has not made up her mind about running.

A representative for Winfrey did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Democratic race for president won't officially begin until after the 2018 midterms, but many potential candidates are already jostling for position and making trips to Iowa.

"President Winfrey" was the talk of the entertainment world after Winfrey accepted the Cecil B. DeMille Award at the Golden Globes. And the "Oprah for president?" possibility was a top story on morning TV.

The touchstone of her speech was the #MeToo movement. But her hopeful message -- "A new day is on the horizon" -- could have doubled as a campaign rallying cry.

Many liberal-leaning celebrities and viewers certainly heard it that way. And that may have been exactly what Winfrey wanted.

As some political strategists have pointed out in the past year, her fame and wealth could make her a formidable Democratic Party candidate. But insiders have their doubts too: Would Americans really choose a TV star as president twice in a row?

For now, it's all just talk. But her fans demonstrated a lot of wishful thinking on Twitter and Facebook after her speech.

Although Winfrey has deflected questions about a presidential run in the past, she has also acknowledged that President Trump's election upended assumptions about how to pursue political office.

After the speech, Winfrey's longtime partner Stedman Graham was quoted saying a run is certainly a possibility.

"It's up to the people," Graham told a Los Angeles Times reporter. "She would absolutely do it."

Winfrey campaigned for Barack Obama in 2008 and endorsed Hillary Clinton in 2016. During Clinton's campaign, she discussed the prospect of a female president and said "America, it's about time that we made that decision."

She said it would be a "seminal moment for women." But the moment has yet to happen -- which is one of the reasons Sunday's speech stirred so much attention.

Winfrey has deep pockets, an even deeper well of charisma, and instant name recognition, thanks to decades on "The Oprah Winfrey Show."

Reese Witherspoon alluded to her friend's superstar status while introducing her at the Globes: "There's only one person whose name is a verb, an adjective, and a feeling. And that is Oprah."

What she lacks is political experience.

In an interview with Winfrey on Bloomberg last March, interviewer David Rubenstein broached the possibility, saying "It's clear you don't need government experience to be elected president of the United States."

She indicated that the same thought had crossed her mind after Trump's election: "I thought, 'Oh gee, I don't have the experience, I don't know enough.' And now I'm thinking, 'Oh. Oh!'"

Winfrey laughed while the studio audience applauded.

More recently, when her best friend Gayle King brought up the idea on "CBS This Morning," Winfrey shot it down: "There will be no running for office of any kind for me."

Right now Winfrey has multiple jobs: She's the CEO of the cable channel OWN, a "special correspondent" for the CBS newsmagazine "60 Minutes" and an investor in companies like Weight Watchers.

She recently sold part of her stake in OWN but renewed her contract to remain CEO through 2025.

Her role at CBS News would conflict with any serious exploration of a presidential run.

Winfrey's next role is in Ava DuVernay's movie "A Wrinkle in Time," which comes out in April.

The political back-and-forth has already begun. On Sunday night Winfrey's detractors immediately began circulating an old photo of Winfrey with Harvey Weinstein, the disgraced movie mogul who has become the symbol of Hollywood rot.

But her fans portrayed her as the perfect anti-Trump candidate -- that is, if she's willing to run. Videos and transcripts of the speech were widely shared on social media on Monday morning.

The Washington Post quoted Meryl Streep saying that Winfrey "launched a rocket" with the speech.

"I want her to run for president," Streep told The Post. "I don't think she had any intention [of declaring]. But now she doesn't have a choice."

Earlier in the evening, Globes host Seth Meyers actually teed up the speculation.

"Oprah," Meyers said, looking out at her in the audience, "in 2011, I told some jokes about our current president at the White House Correspondents Dinner -- jokes about how he was unqualified to be president -- and some have said that night convinced him to run. So if that's true, I just want to say: Oprah, you will never be president! You do not have what it takes!"

The laughs and cheers from the crowd made it clear: Winfrey would have a lot of supporters in the entertainment industry.

http://money.cnn.com/2018/01/08/media/oprah-golden-globes/index.html

Looks like we’ll be having Trump for 8 years.
 
. . . . .
Oprah is even nuttier than Hillary. Trump won because he was slightly less nuttier than her.
Nope trump appealed to the masses and the masses are stupid. They like chaotic statements like all Muslims will be banned. Build a wallvto keep Mexicans out....the hillbies are going yeahhh let's make America great by doing that.
 
.
She is and Trump once said she was his ideal running mate for the Presidency.

I think Oprah would get huge turnout, but will America elect another "star" with no political experience? It's hard to say.

Either way, the 2020 campaign is shaping up to be another "must watch" event.
 
.
I think Oprah would get huge turnout, but will America elect another "star" with no political experience? It's hard to say.

Either way, the 2020 campaign is shaping up to be another "must watch" event.
Well she has a brain and won't gettheracist vote which trump depends on and it's huge
 
.
It's appalling to think that someone is POTUS material simply because they are billionaire celebrities! When will this stupidity stop?

Well she has a brain and won't gettheracist vote which trump depends on and it's huge

Trump has both a brain and got votes other than racists. Oprah made one speech at a meaningless award show and every idiot liberal in Hollywood thinks she's presidential material. Get a grip, folks!
 
.
Nope trump appealed to the masses and the masses are stupid. They like chaotic statements like all Muslims will be banned. Build a wallvto keep Mexicans out....the hillbies are going yeahhh let's make America great by doing that.

Trump won because he managed to convinced the economically disenfranchised that he had their best interests at heart. Hillary was never able to construct a message that resonated with them. That's why he ultimately won.
 
.
Whats the difference between actively thinking and passively thinking?
 
.
It's appalling to think that someone is POTUS material simply because they are billionaire celebrities! When will this stupidity stop?



Trump has both a brain and got votes other than racists. Oprah made one speech at a meaningless award show and every idiot liberal in Hollywood thinks she's presidential material. Get a grip, folks!

The problem with the Democrats is they think everybody in the Democratic Party are Liberals.

Oprah is only slightly less wealthier than Trump.
 
.
Trump won because he managed to convinced the economically disenfranchised that he had their best interests at heart. Hillary was never able to construct a message that resonated with them. That's why he ultimately won.
indeed

It's appalling to think that someone is POTUS material simply because they are billionaire celebrities! When will this stupidity stop?



Trump has both a brain and got votes other than racists. Oprah made one speech at a meaningless award show and every idiot liberal in Hollywood thinks she's presidential material. Get a grip, folks!

lol...and trump did a meaningless show
 
.
Oprah 2020? Democrats Swing From Giddy to Skeptical at the Prospect


By ALEXANDER BURNS and AMY CHOZICKJAN. 8, 2018

Continue reading the main storyShare This Page
  • to The Los Angeles Times that she would “absolutely do it” — with the caveat that such matters are “up to the people.”

    There was no more official signal on Monday from Ms. Winfrey, 63, as to her interest in the presidency. She has disavowed any ambition to be a candidate in the past, though she has told associates in recent months that she wants to play a part in bringing the country together, two people briefed on her thinking said.

    If Ms. Winfrey’s ambitions are unclear, the sometimes giddy reaction to her speech at a Hollywood awards dinner underscored the unfulfilled hunger among Democrats for a larger-than-life leader to challenge President Trump.

    With no obvious front-runner for the 2020 campaign, Democrats appear likely to spend the next few years grinding through internal disagreements over policy and identity in a long contest for the nomination. There are thorny disagreements in the party about how bluntly liberal its agenda should be, how boldly to confront Mr. Trump and how to balance the task of turning out core Democratic voters with the desire to win over disaffected Republicans and independents.

    Continue reading the main story


    Oprah Winfrey Coming to ‘60 Minutes’ as a Special Contributor JAN. 31, 2017


  • Read Oprah Winfrey’s Golden Globes Speech JAN. 7, 2018

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

In the imagination of some Democrats, Ms. Winfrey might offer an easy way out of those problems. She inspires crucial groups for the party — women and African-Americans — and alienates few. She has cast herself in American culture as an avatar of optimism, not defined in ideological terms. Having made a career out of preaching the values of empowerment and inclusion, she represents in some ways a natural counterpoint to Mr. Trump’s proud pugilism. Senior Democrats in Washington said on Monday they had received no signal from Ms. Winfrey that she hoped to seek the White House.

David Axelrod, the former chief strategist for Barack Obama, said Ms. Winfrey was a figure of unique political potential, with “a boundless capacity for empathy and a preternatural ability to communicate powerfully and authentically — as we saw at the Golden Globes.”

Mr. Axelrod questioned, however, whether Ms. Winfrey would be the right fit for 2020: “Would she want to submit herself to the unforgiving, relentless and sometimes absurd process of running for president?” he wondered, adding: “Will there be hunger in 2020 for someone with some experience in government, after Trump?”

Some Democrats expressed skepticism and even frustration about the swirl of fascination with Ms. Winfrey, arguing that the party was jumping the gun with fevered speculation about 2020. Senator Brian Schatz of Hawaii, a young liberal in the chamber, wrote tersely on Twitter: “Hey. Let’s focus on winning in 2018. Thanks.”

Rebecca Katz, a Democratic strategist from the party’s progressive wing, said it would be a mistake for Democrats to rush toward a magnetic personality rather than hashing out a compelling agenda for the midterm elections and beyond.

“Beating Trump isn’t just about finding the right candidate — we have to show what we stand for,” Ms. Katz said. “Other than ‘we all get a car,’ what will an Oprah presidency look like?” she added, referring to when Ms. Winfrey famously gave a car to every audience member at her show.

Ms. Winfrey’s sudden prominence in the nation’s political imagination speaks, in some respects, to the merging of politics and entertainment in the American mind. She has occupied a singular role in the television industry, parlaying roles as a local news anchor and a talk-show host in Chicago into a media empire that includes her own cable network and a fortune estimated at close to $3 billion. Gallup polling regularly finds Ms. Winfrey among the country’s most admired women, alongside Hillary Clinton and Michelle Obama.

Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the House Democratic leader, suggested — with a dose of skepticism — that Ms. Winfrey was the kind of political outsider Democrats might embrace.

Alluding to Mr. Trump’s lack of experience, Ms. Pelosi tartly told a small group of reporters that Ms. Winfrey had other qualities going for her: “Oprah has read books. She knows how to identify talent.”

“If we’re going into a place where they are devaluing experience in terms of substance and legislative acumen and stuff like that,” Ms. Pelosi said, “you might as well have somebody who knows what they don’t know and would get the best possible people there.”

Newsletter Sign Up
Continue reading the main story
Morning Briefing
Get what you need to know to start your day in the United States, Canada and the Americas, delivered to your inbox.


You agree to receive occasional updates and special offers for The New York Times's products and services.


Ms. Winfrey’s commercial reach transcends race and income level, analysts say, propelling so many books and products to overnight success that it has earned its own sobriquet: “The Oprah Effect.” In 2015, Ms. Winfrey bought a 10 percent stake in Weight Watchers and assumed a position on the company’s board, a move that instantly doubled the company’s sluggish share price and added $400 million to its market value.

Other investments have eluded that Midas touch. Ms. Winfrey’s cable channel, OWN: The Oprah Winfrey Network, a joint venture with Discovery Communications Inc., initially struggled to gain traction and last year earned an average of 462,000 prime time viewers daily. In December, Discovery said it would take majority control of OWN, purchasing 24.5 percent of the channel for $70 million from Ms. Winfrey’s company, Harpo.

Ms. Winfrey’s most potent appeal, industry analysts say, is among somewhat older consumers — or perhaps, voters — with women over 55 as her strongest cohort. She is especially popular among African-American women and white suburban women, two groups Democrats will rely on in the 2018 and 2020 elections.

By Monday afternoon, the White House had responded to the threat of Oprah in 2020. “We welcome the challenge,” said Hogan Gidley, a spokesman for the president, “whether it be Oprah Winfrey or anybody else.”

But Ms. Winfrey has approached politics cautiously over the years, engaging highly selectively. In 2007, she intervened for Mr. Obama, holding rallies for him and hailing him as “the one.” And in 2013, she hosted a fund-raising event for Cory Booker, in his first bid for Senate in New Jersey.

During the 2016 campaign, Ms. Winfrey endorsed Mrs. Clinton but never ventured onto the campaign trail. Though Ms. Winfrey and her staff discussed a possible appearance with the Clinton campaign, none was ever scheduled. Ms. Winfrey’s aides cited her focus on righting her television network as the reason for her difficult schedule.

Minyon Moore, a Clinton adviser who communicated with the Winfrey team, said the campaign had been “delighted” to have Ms. Winfrey’s endorsement. Should Ms. Winfrey seek to assemble a campaign team for 2020, Ms. Moore said, “I suspect she would have her pick.”

Less certain is whether Ms. Winfrey could navigate the ideological pitfalls of a presidential campaign and give voice not just to broad themes, but actual policy prescriptions. While Ms. Winfrey has aligned herself generally with Democrats like Mr. Obama, her views on a range of issues from financial regulation to drone warfare are opaque. She drew criticism from the left last year after saying in an interview that she felt hopeful and believed Mr. Trump had been “humbled” after meeting with Mr. Obama during the presidential transition.

Alixandria Lapp, a strategist helping lead Democrats’ effort to retake the House, said the profile of a media mogul outsider would be an uncomfortable match for the party.

“I think it’s highly unlikely that Democrats will ever nominate our own version of Donald Trump — a celebrity with no government experience — because our party tends to respect government and governing experience,” Ms. Lapp said.

Ms. Winfrey has recently taken on political topics as a special correspondent for CBS News’s “60 Minutes,” including a segment on the country’s political divisions and another on the use of solitary confinement in prisons.

But even to close friends and admirers, the prospect of an Oprah 2020 race appeared far-fetched or impossible as recently as last year. After Mr. Trump’s inauguration, when the traditional barriers to entry into presidential politics appeared to melt away, Ms. Winfrey’s associates dismissed the idea.

A reporter who last March contacted Ms. Winfrey’s best friend, Gayle King of CBS News, got an emphatic reaction to the 2020 question.

“NOT A CHANCE!!!!!” Ms. King replied at the time, adding: “In caps for a reason.”

Thomas Kaplan and Jonathan Martin contributed reporting.

A version of this article appears in print on January 9, 2018, on Page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: Oprah 2020? The Idea Makes Democrats Giddy and Skeptical . Order Reprints| Today's Paper|Subscribe
 
.
Back
Top Bottom