What's new

Only ‘The Nuclear Option’ Can Work Against Iran, Former IDF Chief Says

Hasbara Buster

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Aug 17, 2010
Messages
4,612
Reaction score
-7
Israeli Insanity

Only ‘The Nuclear Option’ Can Work Against Iran, Former IDF Chief Says

But, Dan Halutz tells the Sunday Times, ‘I hope Bibi is not mad enough to think about it’

By Aaron Kalman

November 11, 2012 "Times Of Israel"-- Israeli leaders have concluded that conventional air strikes would be insufficient in curbing Iran’s nuclear program, leaving only a deployment of either tactical nuclear weapons or ground forces, according to a report in the British Sunday Times.

Western “defense experts” quoted by the report pointed at the Iranian Fordo facility, which is located deep underground near the city of Qom, as a site that was immune to conventional air strikes.

“The only way to finish off Iran’s nuclear program is by using the nuclear option,” said IDF Chief of General Staff Dan Halutz, the only named source quoted by the report. “But I hope Bibi [Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu] is not mad enough to think about it.”

According to foreign reports, Israel is in possession of a significant arsenal of nuclear weapons, including tactical weapons such as neutron bombs, along with long-range Jericho missiles to deliver them.

Israel also possesses GBU-28 bunker-buster bombs that could be deployed by the Israel Air Force’s F-16 bombers. However, according to assessments, these bombs would not prove sufficient to penetrate the Fordo facility.

Rivals fear Israel’s Binyamin Netanyahu is plotting nuclear strike on Iran

By Uzi Mahnaimi, Tel Aviv

November 11, 2012 " Sunday Times" -- ISRAEL’S military planners have been forced to conclude that a conventional assault on Iran’s nuclear facilities might fail after evidence emerged that Tehran has hidden far more of its uranium enrichment capacity beneath a mountain than previously suspected.

Western defence experts say much of Iran’s Fordow enrichment site near the city of Qom is now deep underground in a “zone of immunity” safe from conventional airstrikes.

They claim this narrows Israel’s response to two options: the deployment of special forces in a ground attack, or the use of ballistic missiles carrying small tactical nuclear warheads.

The phrase zone of immunity was coined by Ehud Barak, the defence minister, to emphasise that time is running out for Israel as Iran moves closer to being able to make a nuclear weapon.

“Israel’s plans have been constantly evolving in recent years according to the progress Iran is making,” said a senior defence source. Continue: Rivals fear Israel

Israeli Insanity: Only ‘The Nuclear Option’ Can Work Against Iran, Former IDF Chief Says
 
I really doubt the Israeli's will (be allowed to) go nuclear on Iran.

InformationClearingHouse isn't the most reliable of sources to begin with.
 
Mainstream western media is far less reliable than alternative media sources such as informationclearinghouse, Press tv, RT and others.
 
Mainstream western media is far less reliable than alternative media sources such as informationclearinghouse, Press tv, RT and others.

Ok, lets assume that an important former Isreali defence chief did actually post this opinion.
The content at the Sunday Times is protected by a subscription need, so I can't personally verify this post or the claim.
But let's take your word for it, Hasbara Buster.

I still think the Israeli government will not be (allowed to) use nukes to bust bunkers in Iran.
They'll have to use ground troops, that means get all of NATO involved (putting Israel squarely in the public eye as an integral member of NATO), and it means regime change by invasion of westerners for Iran. Something the Green movement in Iran is no doubt begging and preparing for. :)

Just support the Green movement when the time is there.

Meanwhile, I'm considering mobilizing the EU governments for this task. I have the email addresses of the British and Dutch governments already for instance ;)
 
Just kidding, Hasbara Buster & friends, I won't be a war mongerer.. But maybe, you know, desperate times call for desperate measures?.. Depends on how much muslims keep insisting Iran must have nukes as well, really. Action = Reaction.
 
I still think the Israeli government will not be (allowed to) use nukes to bust bunkers in Iran.
I didn't claim anything, just showing how Satanic those people are.

Just kidding, Hasbara Buster & friends, I won't be a war mongerer.. But maybe, you know, desperate times call for desperate measures?.. Depends on how much muslims keep insisting Iran must have nukes as well, really. Action = Reaction.

Who decides that western powers and Israel - the most aggressive states on earth by far - are allowed to have nuclear weapons to terrorize the Middle East and the rest of the free world?

Iran wants total de-nuclearization in the world, do western governments want that? Have they ever proposed this like Iran has? :D

As for action-reaction; Iran is reacting to Zionist and western imperialism and terror; not the other way around. This is a fact.

Who is overthrowing whose governments exactly? Who is imposing sanctions on independent nations? Who is training and funding terrorists and sending them to countries like Libya and Syria? I could go on and on....
 
I didn't claim anything, just showing how Satanic those people are.

Ehm, in my opinion you did claim (or at least having a fear of) that the Israeli's are seriously considering nuking Iran's bunkers.
You did not mention if these bunkers would be in areas where if hit by such smaller nukes, there would be any civilian casualties.

The Israelis and the Americans have made clear for nearly a decade (or even much longer, iirc) that Iran is not allowed to create nuclear weapons. And that the official Iranian promises can not be trusted based on historic need for action against Iran's nuclear weapons program.

Nor do I think the Israelis are being Satanic, or desperate, they are just very very assertive based on years of nearly nothing else but hatred from Arabs and Muslims, over a small piece of sandland that was granted to them in a book that worships the same one God that Allah is. That's at least my interpretation; all (major) religions on earth point to the same God.

Therefore, it is the high levels of muslim hatred against Jewish presence in the country now known as Israel, that is causing this problem.

The Iranian government and higher clergy keep repeating their desire for the country of Israel to be "disolved" or "removed", and future generations of important Iranian "royalty-government" members, have indicated the same desire. You are what your parents make of you?
 
Thanks for exposing yourself. I could explain to you that all the wars were started by Israel and that Israel is the aggressor in the region (not Arab countries), but it's clear that you are not worth my time. You are merely parroting official western and zionist propaganda.
 
papegaai.jpg



Arabs bad !!!


Israel good !!!
 
Thanks for exposing yourself. I could explain to you that all the wars were started by Israel and that Israel is the aggressor in the region (not Arab countries), but it's clear that you are not worth my time. You are merely parroting official western and zionist propaganda.

The wars that started the Israeli-Arab conflict were started by the Arabs surrounding Israel. Do you want to deny history?
Subsequently, Arabs have repeated their call for Israel to be removed by violence over and over again. Do you deny that as well?
 
Who decides that western powers and Israel - the most aggressive states on earth by far - are allowed to have nuclear weapons to terrorize the Middle East and the rest of the free world?

We don't terrorize, we respond to aggression. We retaliate, or we invite more violence towards our own.
We invited millions of Arabs (like your parents or grandparents, likely, Hasbara Buster) into europe, and now some muslims in some places in the world are calling for muslims to rule Europe with their sharia (sharia4belgium, sharia4holland).
It's muslim aggressiveness that you keep denying, it's westerners and Israelis that you keep demonizing, that's the way for you to get a serious headache and heartache.

You also do not speak to your more violent muslim peers about the need to practice peaceful resistance, do you? Be honest.

Iran wants total de-nuclearization in the world, do western governments want that? Have they ever proposed this like Iran has? :D

see http://www.defence.pk/forums/world-affairs/53979-iaea-hypocrisy-israeli-nukes-66.html#post3568582 items number 1 & 2

I fully intend to imply that muslims will use "conventional", chemical and even biological weaponry on eachother (sunni<->shia) and westerners alike, if nukes weren't "balanced" the way they are right now.

As for action-reaction; Iran is reacting to Zionist and western imperialism and terror; not the other way around. This is a fact.

You don't get it. I used to be very patient with muslims like you. But the fact is, you don't stop pushing your "viewpoints". You never want to learn. And that's going to be the cause of your suffering during your lifetime. But hey, the Quran teaches you to accept a life of misery in return for a pleasant heaven, right.. Just don't expect us to let you make us suffer just to get us to make you suffer so you can go to that heaven of yours.

Either you muslims on this forum start singing a different tone, or I'm going to try to mobilize the EU governments to invest heavily in whatever military hardware that will keep the nuclear weapons ambitions of Iran at bay. If we need to blow up an entire mountain containing your labs, then I say we drop so many heavy non-nuclear bombs on it that eventually the entire mountain is vaporized! And we put a CNN live van at a safe distance to transmit the fireworks in real time! :D

Who is overthrowing whose governments exactly? Who is imposing sanctions on independent nations? Who is training and funding terrorists and sending them to countries like Libya and Syria? I could go on and on....

We're STABILIZING as many governments as we can. We are bringing the opportunity of education to girls. Freedom of choice to women. And you fundamentalistic muslims can't handle it at all. That's why radical muslims hate us; we free those they've enslaved generation after generation since the creation of Islam. But ehm, you're NOT SUPPOSED TO enslave your wives and daughters!

And what do radical muslims do, instead of accepting more modern times with more individual freedom? They cling to their slave-driven way of life with spiritual-level lies, torture of their own people, and playing the innocent terrorized swan towards the outside world.

Re-consider who and what you're supporting, Hasbara Buster..
What does Hasbara mean anyway?
 
I will state clearly now that I'm willing to teach any muslims the art of debating. My only condition is that you stop supporting terrorism, publicly and privately. A tall price, but necessary to learn the debating art skills I'm offering to you.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom