What's new

On stashed cash: State could impose 10% tax on remittances

Dubious

RETIRED MOD
Joined
Jul 22, 2012
Messages
37,717
Reaction score
80
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
By Shahbaz Rana
Published: May 9, 2015


883319-MDGRemittanceandmoneyAFPcopy-1431108025-131-640x480.jpg

Citing the case of model Ayyan Ali, officials said it was not an isolated case of transferring unexplained income abroad. PHOTO: AFP

ISLAMABAD:
As authorities struggle to increase tax collection, the state is considering a proposal that could see a levy of 10% tax on profit made on foreign remittances placed in savings accounts.


The proposal comes as the government suspects that the amount sent through remittances could be black money being channelled into the country to evade taxes.

The authorities may also bring gold and silver imports into the tax ambit with its plan of charging 6% withholding tax at the import stage.

16.7b.jpg


The proposals are part of the PML-N government’s elimination of concessionary tax regime plan that will be implemented from the next fiscal year 2016.

Under $6.7-billion International Monetary Fund bailout programme, the government is bound to phase out all the concessionary Statutory Regulatory Orders (SROs) within three years.

In the first phase, it has already withdrawn Rs103 billion worth of SROs. The next phase will be implemented from July this year and the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has worked out plans to withdraw more SROs worth up to Rs120 billion.

At present, the profit earned by depositing remittances proceeds in local banks is exempted from all taxes — including the 10% withholding tax that is charged on profit-generating bank accounts. The FBR has firmed up the proposal to withdraw this exemption along with almost a dozen more from next fiscal year, said sources in the tax machinery.

Remittances are one of the main sources of foreign earnings and successive governments have shown reluctance to charge taxes on remittances. The fear stems from the government’s reluctance to disturb the flow of dollars critical to balance external books so much so that it is reimbursing the transfer fee to encourage repatriates to send money through banking channels.

For the ongoing fiscal year, the government has estimated receiving $16.7 billion or Rs1.7 trillion on account of workers’ remittances. In the first nine months of this fiscal, the country received $13.3 billion remittances, according to the State Bank of Pakistan.

The FBR is of the view that the profit earned by placing funds in banks cannot be treated as foreign income and should be taxed. All foreign remittances are exempted from all kinds of taxes and are utilised to hide black money, explained a senior FBR official.

According to a former central banker, roughly 10% to 15% of the total remittances are not genuine cases and the channel is used as means to legalise ‘ill-gotten’ earnings. He said that these enormous amounts are subsequently invested in the stock market and the real estate sector.

The authorities argue that if the exemption continues, it will hinder efforts to curb the growing money laundering issue.

Citing the case of model Ayyan Ali, officials said it was not an isolated case of transferring unexplained income abroad. Ayyan was arrested by customs officials from Islamabad airport with $500,000 undeclared cash.

Officials said politicians and industrialists have been using these channels to transfer their ill-gotten money to Dubai and then use the remittances channel to bring it back.

Tax on gold

The FBR is also considering imposing withholding taxes at 6% on gold and silver at the import stage. At present, the imports of gold and silver have been exempted from taxes through an SRO by the ministry of commerce aimed at encouraging the export of the refined gold and silver products.

In another significant proposal, the government may also withdraw tax exemptions available to investment companies including National Investment Trust on distribution of profit among shareholders.

Last year, the government had withdrawn a similar blanket exemption available to mutual funds, limiting it to only those companies that distribute at least 90% of the profit in cash.

The FBR wants that entities like Sheikh Sultan Trust Karachi, provident funds, benevolent funds and other such investment funds should either distribute up to 90% of the profit in cash or pay the tax.



On stashed cash: State could impose 10% tax on remittances - The Express Tribune

Sounds like gunda tax being legalized :coffee:


The proposal comes as the government suspects that the amount sent through remittances could be black money being channelled into the country to evade taxes.
Lets say this is true....So they want a piece of the haram money? Interesting!

However, wasnt Lady Ayyan knighted? No action was taken showing they welcome black money (you know money coming in suitcases from a supermodel) But god forbid a mazdoor sends some money home....then you complain no one invests....

What should be checked is WHO is sending the money...if it is a foreign national sure tax them....I dare you...but experience shows me you will kiss their feet and only tax your own people...

You people cant extract tax from your own wadera friends but the very people who work legally seem to biting you?

I remember not too long ago the Noras were showing off how much remittence comes in the country thanks to NS well thanks to him even the previous amount coming in might stop...Progress zindabad!


 
This would again promote hundi and hawala and undo the efforts done to increase remittances. Rather treat the remittances sent from tax-free countries as taxable income and then levy income tax on people who recieve remittances to high quantum thus leading to high income.
 
This would again promote hundi and hawala and undo the efforts done to increase remittances. Rather treat the remittances sent from tax-free countries as taxable income and then levy income tax on people who recieve remittances to high quantum thus leading to high income.
Or control the shit in the country so that people dont smuggle it out and then pollute the remittance channel
 
Or control the shit in the country so that people dont smuggle it out and then pollute the remittance channel
Money laundering is a long going phenomenon. The country is still flooded with black money. The only city documented to some extent is Karachi where plastic money is in abundant use. Lahore and Islamabad are digitized to some extent while Rest of the country is full cash driven.
 
So basically impose more indirect taxes and this time counter overseas Pakistanis, the only and most significant source of foreign income in Pakistan.

Don't discourage us to send less money in future or only the government will be regretting afterwards.
 
So basically impose more indirect taxes and this time counter overseas Pakistanis, the only and most significant source of foreign income in Pakistan.

Don't discourage us to send less money in future or only the government will be regretting afterwards.
Yea while milking everyone on the land why leave the overseas? Greed has no boundaries....It wants everything...yet the grave doesnt increase in size now does it nor its punishments decrease?
 
noora economics=destroy the only source of $$$ for the country
all heil the king
these a holes will not let go of indirect taxes
 
Tax Landlords before taxing remittance of heard working Pakistanis working abroad leaving their families.

Sorry to comment on your internal matter
 
If implemented & 10% is passed on to the customer, than brace yourselves for a decrease in legal foreign remmittences.. Which will than greatly have its effect on foreign reserves..which r on the rise thanks to overseas Pakistanis..
 
.
This would be idiotic. People do turn there black money white through remittances but this is no solution.
 
One thing I can suggest is that the money coming from foreign channels should not be allowed to go into undocumented sectors like Real Estate. The Expats have poured massive sums in this black market and driven the prices so high that the housing is now becoming almost un-affordable for locals. This needs to be stopped, their investment be only allowed in sectors which are connected to real economy i.e. Bond markets, banks, stocks or businesses or put constraints on ownership of real estate (like two for whole family) etc
 
Back
Top Bottom