What's new

Oil council: Shale won’t last, Arctic drilling needed now

Hindustani78

BANNED
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
40,471
Reaction score
-47
Country
India
Location
India
Oil council: Shale won’t last, Arctic drilling needed now | Arab News

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Published — Monday 30 March 2015

WASHINGTON: The US should immediately begin a push to exploit its enormous trove of oil in the Arctic waters off of Alaska, or risk a renewed reliance on imported oil in the future, an Energy Department advisory council says in a study to be released Friday.

The US has drastically cut imports and transformed itself into the world’s biggest producer of oil and natural gas by tapping huge reserves in shale rock formations. But the government predicts that the shale boom won’t last much beyond the next decade.

In order for the US to keep domestic production high and imports low, oil companies should start probing the Arctic now because it takes 10 to 30 years of preparation and drilling to bring oil to market, according to a draft of the study’s executive summary obtained by the Associated Press.

“To remain globally competitive and to be positioned to provide global leadership and influence in the Arctic, the US should facilitate exploration in the offshore Alaskan Arctic now,” the study’s authors wrote.
The study, produced by the National Petroleum Council at the request of Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz, comes at a time when many argue the world needs less oil, not more. US oil storage facilities are filling up, the price of oil has collapsed from over $100 a barrel to around $50, and prices are expected to stay relatively low for years to come. At the same time, scientists say the world needs to drastically reduce the amount of fossil fuels it is burning in order to avoid catastrophic changes to the earth’s climate.

The push to make the Arctic waters off of Alaska more accessible to drillers comes just as Royal Dutch Shell is poised to restart its troubled drilling program there. The company has little to show after spending years and more than $5 billion preparing for work, waiting for regulatory approval, and early-stage drilling. After assuring regulators it was prepared for the harsh conditions, one of its drill ships ran aground in heavy seas near Kodiak Island in 2012. Its drilling contractor, Noble Drilling, was convicted of violating environmental and safety rules.

Environmental advocates say the Arctic ecosystem is too fragile to risk a spill, and cleanup would be difficult or perhaps even impossible because of weather and ice.
“If there’s a worse place to look for oil, I don’t know what it is,” says Niel Lawrence, Alaska director for the Natural Resources Defense Council. “There aren’t any proven effective ways of cleaning up an oil spill in the Arctic.”

But global demand for oil, which affects prices of gasoline, diesel and other fuels everywhere, is expected to rise steadily in the coming decades — even as alternative energy use blossoms — because hundreds of millions of people are rising from poverty in developing regions and buying more cars, shipping more goods, and flying in airplanes more often.

In order to meet that demand and keep prices from soaring, new sources of oil must be developed, the council argues. The Arctic is among the biggest such sources in the world and in the US.
 
.
That dried up pretty quick.

US drill the artic, 20 years later the world ends. :usflag:
 
.
What is ths Americans doing there ?
Their oil consumption is just ridiculous.
 
.
What is ths Americans doing there ?
Their oil consumption is just ridiculous.
Imagine if India and China reach their full potential.How quickly will the oil dry up.
 
. .
i wonder what will happen when the oil really dries up, and, it surely will someday soon. Solar energy is not mature and capable of powering the entire world or doing everything what we used to do by burning oil. not is its current form at least. So either someone will come up with a true revolutionary idea in field of Solar Energy or people will have to find some other source to fill in the gap. All said, there still might be a number of things that we could do with oil only and will have to change those machines, systems and processes to become suitable for what ever energy alternative world will be shifting too.
 
. . .
All said, there still might be a number of things that we could do with oil only
We may find another source for energy but oil is only source we have to make plastics and petrochemical and don't forget about Natural gas too,without it there will be no fertilizers.
 
.
We may find another source for energy but oil is only source we have to make plastics and petrochemical and don't forget about Natural gas too,without it there will be no fertilizers.
Exactly, that is why i said that lot have to be changed. We will need to change lots of processes and machines if we want to keep things running they way they are. As you have pointed, only finding replacement of Oil as fuel wont be enough, will need to work out replacements of lots of other petrochemicals as well.
 
.
I wont.
These level of consumption is indeed ridiculous.

I'm not surprised you don't read. Hence why I stated you need to. Otherwise you don't know what you are saying.

WASHINGTON: The US should immediately begin a push to exploit its enormous trove of oil in the Arctic waters off of Alaska, or risk a renewed reliance on imported oil in the future, an Energy Department advisory council says in a study to be released Friday.

But global demand for oil, which affects prices of gasoline, diesel and other fuels everywhere, is expected to rise steadily in the coming decades — even as alternative energy use blossoms — because hundreds of millions of people are rising from poverty in developing regions and buying more cars, shipping more goods, and flying in airplanes more often.


In order to meet that demand and keep prices from soaring, new sources of oil must be developed, the council argues. The Arctic is among the biggest such sources in the world and in the US.
 
. .
I'm not surprised you don't read. Hence why I stated you need to. Otherwise you don't know what you are saying.

WASHINGTON: The US should immediately begin a push to exploit its enormous trove of oil in the Arctic waters off of Alaska, or risk a renewed reliance on imported oil in the future, an Energy Department advisory council says in a study to be released Friday.

But global demand for oil, which affects prices of gasoline, diesel and other fuels everywhere, is expected to rise steadily in the coming decades — even as alternative energy use blossoms — because hundreds of millions of people are rising from poverty in developing regions and buying more cars, shipping more goods, and flying in airplanes more often.


In order to meet that demand and keep prices from soaring, new sources of oil must be developed, the council argues. The Arctic is among the biggest such sources in the world and in the US.

List of countries by energy consumption per capita - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Of Course some ME nations havemore than that .
But they dont have yours level of population .
You found out the Shale gas recently and now you are also declaring its death warrant .Quite ridiculous indeed.
 
.
List of countries by energy consumption per capita - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Of Course some ME nations havemore than that .
But they dont have yours level of population .
You found out the Shale gas recently and now you are also declaring its death warrant .Quite ridiculous indeed.

Yeah imagine more than a billion people in say 2 countries where people would want more things.
Remember that those countries are still developing, not developed. China for example. As you notice in a span of 10 years. I believe in a few years China will surpass the U.S. in oil consumption.
main.png
 
.
Yeah imagine more than a billion people in say 2 countries where people would want more things.
Remember that those countries are still developing, not developed. China for example. As you notice in a span of 10 years. I believe in a few years China will surpass the U.S. in oil consumption.
main.png


No they wont .
I know you are talking about China and India.
But these nation will have more than 1 billion people in near future like now and their percapita income wont even cross 15000$.even after 3 decades .
But US percapita income is more than 50000$ and will increase in future .So our consumption will always less but US with their ridiculous luxury will move forward with full throttle


List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom