Obama signs Kerry Lugar bill
- Thread starter batmannow
- Start date
WarProfessor
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2009
- Messages
- 438
- Reaction score
- 0
Really? I think US has stopped pointing fingers at China about human rights. And Germans never retreat. Oh, I have the best one hear, Japanese never surrender.
However, I still humbly solute the Chairman. How about take with it, or leave WITH it.
Student
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2009
- Messages
- 140
- Reaction score
- 0
$$$ worshipers Zardari and liberal fascists that have residences and stakes outside Pakistan are the only people happy because it has left the country in shambles. (Dual National Hypocrisy needs to be abolished for avoiding people like Moin Qureshi, Shaukat Aziz and Haqani bin Lagar from pushing there own so called THINK TANK agenda in Pakistan)
The bill mentions the terms like terrorism, nuclear proliferation, ceasing so called support and Military several times the only term that it does not mention a single time is CORRUPTION I bet US did not want to offend MR Corruption himself.
Opposition party PML(N) made all the right noises like a well paid prostitute but did not do anything in real terms and lame Mr Sharif commented after the Bloody Bill got signed.
Bloody US leave Pakistan alone.
The bill mentions the terms like terrorism, nuclear proliferation, ceasing so called support and Military several times the only term that it does not mention a single time is CORRUPTION I bet US did not want to offend MR Corruption himself.
Opposition party PML(N) made all the right noises like a well paid prostitute but did not do anything in real terms and lame Mr Sharif commented after the Bloody Bill got signed.
Bloody US leave Pakistan alone.
Last edited:
Spring Onion
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2006
- Messages
- 41,403
- Reaction score
- 19
- Country
- Location
‘Kerry-Lugar explanatory note has no legal value’
* PML-N MNA says no state can accept clauses holding it responsible for promoting terrorism
Staff Report
ISLAMABAD: The explanatory statement attached to the Kerry-Lugar bill has no legal value, Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid MNA Marvi Memon said on Thursday.
She said the “lethal aspects” of the bill would not be toned down, even if the statement had any legal validity.
In a statement, Marvi said the most controversial clause in the bill pertained to giving the US direct access to Pakistani nationals associated with networks helping to acquire nuclear weapons-related materials. The explanatory statement was unacceptable as it demanded ‘cooperative efforts’ to combat proliferation. Such cooperation was intrusive since it demanded ‘direct access’, she added.
Marvi said Pakistan is a responsible nuclear state and did not wish to proliferate, but that did not mean that the country agreed to such kind of information sharing.
Promoting terrorism: Marvi said another clause in the bill referred to Islamabad accepting that its military and intelligence agencies had supported terrorist organisations in the past. She said the explanatory note would not delete that “admission”, adding no state would accept a clause that held it liable for promoting state terrorism. It would be irresponsible on the government’s part to accept the allegation and open the doors for further accusations from India, she added.
Marvi said another issue regarding the statement pertained to US President Barack Obama’s regional security strategy that included working with “relevant governments and organisations in the region and elsewhere”. It has been reiterated in the statement that said the clause was meant to develop a “regional security plan for how the US can best work with its partners”.
Marvi said such a regional strategy would be “lethal” for Pakistan’s national security interests since it could include foreign intelligence agencies such as India’s Research and Analysis Wing and Israel’s Mossad.
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2009\10\16\story_16-10-2009_pg7_38
* PML-N MNA says no state can accept clauses holding it responsible for promoting terrorism
Staff Report
ISLAMABAD: The explanatory statement attached to the Kerry-Lugar bill has no legal value, Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid MNA Marvi Memon said on Thursday.
She said the “lethal aspects” of the bill would not be toned down, even if the statement had any legal validity.
In a statement, Marvi said the most controversial clause in the bill pertained to giving the US direct access to Pakistani nationals associated with networks helping to acquire nuclear weapons-related materials. The explanatory statement was unacceptable as it demanded ‘cooperative efforts’ to combat proliferation. Such cooperation was intrusive since it demanded ‘direct access’, she added.
Marvi said Pakistan is a responsible nuclear state and did not wish to proliferate, but that did not mean that the country agreed to such kind of information sharing.
Promoting terrorism: Marvi said another clause in the bill referred to Islamabad accepting that its military and intelligence agencies had supported terrorist organisations in the past. She said the explanatory note would not delete that “admission”, adding no state would accept a clause that held it liable for promoting state terrorism. It would be irresponsible on the government’s part to accept the allegation and open the doors for further accusations from India, she added.
Marvi said another issue regarding the statement pertained to US President Barack Obama’s regional security strategy that included working with “relevant governments and organisations in the region and elsewhere”. It has been reiterated in the statement that said the clause was meant to develop a “regional security plan for how the US can best work with its partners”.
Marvi said such a regional strategy would be “lethal” for Pakistan’s national security interests since it could include foreign intelligence agencies such as India’s Research and Analysis Wing and Israel’s Mossad.
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2009\10\16\story_16-10-2009_pg7_38
Similar threads
