India is not seen as a threatHilarious how India having ICBM is not seen as a threat. I wonder why that is the case? Are you 100% loyal vassal state of the US?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
India is not seen as a threatHilarious how India having ICBM is not seen as a threat. I wonder why that is the case? Are you 100% loyal vassal state of the US?
We have a saying that everyone prays before a math test. For Dar, this IMF meeting must have felt like the math test of his lifetime. But really, Dar leans heavily on the Lord to reconcile his spreadsheet.Unable to convince the IMF during a meeting, finance minister Ishaq Dar started to recite holy verses in the hope the IMF officials would be emotionally moved to agree with him. Instead, they called for an early coffee break.
I never prayed before a Math test. But I never caredWe have a saying that everyone prays before a math test. For Dar, this IMF meeting must have felt like the math test of his lifetime. But really, Dar leans heavily on the Lord to reconcile his spreadsheet.
Once we are out of bankruptcy mass production of solid fueled ICBM's must start. We need to send a message of what the potential consequences can be should anybody ever think of interfering and over throw our goverment again.After this fiasco is ended we must.
Too much talks about our nukes, and too much meddling in our internal affairs. We need ICBM capable of targetting very specific areas
Wow for word is what I thought, except Mushy wasn’t as nationalist as you give him credit. A nationalist would’ve taken out enemies instead of giving the NRO. He’s part of the long list of bastards hoisted on Pakistan since the 50s. Which other country so stupidly gives up advantage over and over again? 1962, 1990s in Kashmir, 1999 in Kargil, in 00s in Afghanistan etcThis is a very important topic.
Pakistan is in financial distress - the second time a nuclear power finds itself in this position. First instance was Russia in the late nineties. NATO fostered Russian version of PDM upon Russia in early nineties after which the western financial hitmen went to work. Result, as could have been foreseen, was a financial disaster for Russians and a state of affairs which ultimately led to default. But NATO got it wanted namely permission from its Russian tuttoos to allow expansion of NATO to the border of Russia and transfer of significant chunk of priceless Russian assets into western financial system
Something similar has been taking place in Pakistan. NATO, with connivance of Taliban Khan, overthrew nationalist government of Musharraf and installed in its place, gora tuttoos like Zardari/Haqqani/Sharifs/Fatemi. And as was the case with Russia in the nineties, gora tuttoos have driven Pakistan to verge of bankruptcy. Khan to his credit, arrested the slide which made him doubly dangerous because he combined Che Guevara rhetoric with competency - something mullahs and leftists have largely failed to achieve.
So what happened to Russia after default? Russians were smart so they rallied to the nationalist cause of Putin who started a needless and highly destructive war in Chechneya to rally his support base. But then 9/11 happened so all the powers including, Chinese, Russians and Iranians gave carte blanche to Uncle Sam. But US MIC could not leave well enough alone and started the Iraq war which led to the unravelling of unipolar world which came into existence after fall of Berlin Wall.
Americans, upset that world was turning against them started a series of coups in places like Lebanon (cedar revolution), Ukraine (orange revolution) and Pakistan - no catchy name since Pakistanis are not worthy. The orange revolution rang alarm bells in Russia and ultimately resulted in Russian invasion of Crimea in 2014. But like their Pakistani ruling class, Ukrainian elite are dheeth and would not rest until NATO objectives were achieved which is what we see today which is to completely bend over in front of goras. Russia otoh has an awam with a nationalist bent of mind and equally importantly, access to some of the biggest energy resources in the world. Russians therefore can counter NATO in which they have support from China which is also a NATO target.
Question arises why would NATO target Pakistan. Fairly obvious. (1) countries which are even slightly independent cannot be allowed to have nuclear weapons (2) Pakistan's proximity to China i.e. Pakistan can play the same role for NATO that Ukraine has done. Afghanistan is also close to China but Afghanis have self respect so would not allow their country to be turned into Ukraine. Unfortunately self respect is a trait which is as common in Pakistan as tehzeeb and honour are common in India
Pakistan was formed as a result of shifting of global geopolitical plate which moved after Hitler's invasion of Poland. The plates are moving again and as we have seen in Turkey recently, when Earth moves, structures with weak foundation cannot be expected to survive.
They have nukes. They bought dozen warheads from the ex Soviet nations post 1991. Professor Huntington states as much in his clash of civilization book.iran dont have nuks neither they have ICBMs
Better use formulas in that case!We have a saying that everyone prays before a math test. For Dar, this IMF meeting must have felt like the math test of his lifetime. But really, Dar leans heavily on the Lord to reconcile his spreadsheet.
Delusional.... Pakistan can deliver nukes to Israel. Tel Aviv is more important for the US elite than any city in the US.The only reason west is not much apprehensive about Pakistan is it's inability to deliver nukes over long distances. Once Pakistan tries to acquire such ability, you will be the same league of Iran
I never prayed before a Math test. But I never cared
One up his *** apparently. Delivered by khassi billo rani herself.Are you going to get the nukes or not?
Short of a successful foreign invasion the only ones overthrowing a Pakistani government are PakistanisOnce we are out of bankruptcy mass production of solid fueled ICBM's must start. We need to send a message of what the potential consequences can be should anybody ever think of interfering and over throw our goverment again.
I will posit that if Pakistan is offered on a silver platter, there are no takers, let alone 'foreign invasion'. Removing the subjunctive, your statement becomes: "the only ones overthrowing a Pakistani government are Pakistanis". I will go one step further and strengthen it to read: the only ones destroying Pakistan are the governments of Pakistan.Short of a successful foreign invasion the only ones overthrowing a Pakistani government are Pakistanis
More like you present ZERO threat to American/Zionist interests.Definitely not a happy thing for west, but we are unlikely to fall under a radicalized dictator anytime soon