What's new

Notice the difference?

IK may be naive but at least he has a vision something that Mushy,PPP,PMLN in their 30 years did not

Musharraf actually had a vision and Pak was prospering under him. Yes he had some dubious policies but the economy was much better, our relations with the world were better than they were after he left and we had some allies.
 
. .
Well, the first year has fallen far short of the claims. I hope the remainder of the term goes better and actually delivers the results that PMIK promised to the nation.

With the economy as it was (the true extent of which was found out by the PTI government when they took office), there was no way he could fulfill those campaign promises. He has shifted to stabilizing, cutting spending where possible, and winning investor confidence.

If During his tenure he can get export producing industries up and running, and paying there taxes, then he will have done more than the previous two governments.

The only good thing about the previous government(s) is getting the Chinese to build CPEC. No one else would have been willing to invest that much money into a country like ours with the economy the way it was. The unknown interest rates and their payments coming due soon, maybe what hold back economic growth even if exports take off, but like I said, who else would have been willing to even loan Pakistan tens of billions for infrastructure projects, that too in a matter of a decade.
 
. .
Then we have autopilot or as modern self driving vehicles :angel:

Of course! That must be the answer here. Of course.

Then we might as well rename PM House as "White House".

Please go right head. But first, please find a similar recycling of the same faces across parties. (And a masked first lady.)

Hey boss, I am waiting for a reply?

@VCheng

It took me a while longer since I was working in the garage.

With the economy as it was (the true extent of which was found out by the PTI government when they took office), there was no way he could fulfill those campaign promises. He has shifted to stabilizing, cutting spending where possible, and winning investor confidence.

If During his tenure he can get export producing industries up and running, and paying there taxes, then he will have done more than the previous two governments.

The only good thing about the previous government(s) is getting the Chinese to build CPEC. No one else would have been willing to invest that much money into a country like ours with the economy the way it was. The unknown interest rates and their payments coming due soon, maybe what hold back economic growth even if exports take off, but like I said, who else would have been willing to even loan Pakistan tens of billions for infrastructure projects, that too in a matter of a decade.

As I have said many times, I am perfectly content waiting for the remainder of PMIK's term in office to unfold, for better or worse.

Hi,

Just like you riding your bike 90 miles and hour and thinking that your life is in your hands---.

Pakistan ka Allah hafiz!

(And it's usually up to 145, not 90. :D )
 
Last edited:
. . . . . . .
so we need something like nawaz and baynazir gov in late 80s to 90s where they been kicking each other out of power to gain experience..
bohat hi baysabri qoam hai..
i personally dont like azam swati dr Ferdos but still they are doers.
 
.
"Na engine ki khoobi, na kamal e driver
Chali ja rahi hae, khuda kay sahaaray"
 
. . .

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom