BBC asks: Do camera phones need 41mp? To shoot photos as good as the Nokia 808, YES, YES, YES! (#rant)
The tech newbie knows not what mega pixels are
The slightly aware thinks more megapixels the better
The more tech familiar might be aware that more MP doesnt mean better pictures. Its a common comment of the self proclaimed photography enthusiast the MP myth. They might even suggest it might be bad.
Those who assume more MP might not mean anything in the 808, surely dont understand PureView.
Damian Dinning and Nokia know that more MP does not mean better pictures, but knew that to get the best picture quality and camera versatility, there are various solutions to which one required 41mp. Just like with the N8 or the N86, Nokia only ever stepped up the pixels when they knew they could do it damn well properly. Proof? The best camera phone until PureView was the N8. There are no ifs, or buts. The N8 ruled the camera phone segment longer than any other and 808 and PureViews are only set to extend Nokias imaging reign for a long time to come.
Certain iSites are trying to detract away from the Nokia 808 because of what they understand of the megapixel myth. They simply dont get it. Its not about 41mp at all. Its not about taking 38mp photos at all. Its certainly the first interesting talking point but there is so much more; the 41mp is just the tip of the iceberg. This glittery gold is merely a case for the diamond inside.
It is most funny that whilst they try and accuse Nokia of not getting it, its they that fail to understand what Nokia is attempting with the imagery in PureView, debuted on the 808.
The BBC wrote yet another article on Nokias 41mp camera, provocatively titled, Does a cameraphone really need 41 megapixels?
PureView allows lossless zooming without mechanical jutting zooms. Demolder dares to mention that camera phone sensors are tiny. Nokia in 2010 already destroyed all camera phone sensors and even those in compacts. Yesterday their sensor ate the N8′s and all those point and shoots. 3X as much as point and shoots or 5x as much as camera phones.
So:
41mp sensor? Ooh more MP is not good. Actually its bad.
Its not about the mp tick
Its about having better pixels tick
Its about having better sensors tick
Its about having better processing tick
Its about being more versatile with lossless, silent zoom tick
Its about having better low light performance tick
Downer of the party, Demolder says the 808′s unique selling point will not be in proportion to the technological leap or cost. He comes out with this pile of tosh,
Most people would find the zoom useful, though few will know they have it, fewer will discover how to work it and fewer again will remember to use it."
How much of an idiot do you have to be not to know your camera has zoom? Well perhaps Nokia can train them with better ads. Ones that show slide zoom. Dammit Nokia, do the zoom in and enhance joke. Zoom once, zoom in again, and again. Folks with point and shoots know zoom. This shouldnt be that much more difficult. My non techy friends always try to use zoom on my DSLR when using prime lenses. They sort of expect zoom. Deliver the knowledge that you are the one to do zoom the best and right on a phone.
As for need that question can always be answered what is need? As long as the camera is there, its a camera phone. But what differentiates Nokians is that theyre looking for perfection in imaging. If you want high quality photos with versatility in zoom, then of course you need Nokias PureView tech. If you want to take photos like the 808 can, then yes.
---------- Post added at 12:20 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:19 AM ----------
Check out the details...........!