What's new

No Rohingyas In Arakan History: International Experts!

Is this so simple? Chittagong is 90% muslim adjacent to northern arakan rohingya dominated area. Now suppose chittagong was part of Arakan now. As in the history Marak U ruled the place. Was it necessary for the chittagonian people to prove also they are migrant or original tribe?

I believe that Bangala could be there long time ago, may be same time as Sino Tibetan arrived, but large scale migration happened only after British came. The place North of Maungdaw could be sparesely populated, having a mix of Sino Tibetan and Aryan before 19th century.
 
. .
Panthay come out and say that they are not ill treated over and over again. So Barmese Buddhist is not directed against Muslims but certain bad element of Muslims who adhere to Islamofascism.

Chinese Muslims are going to show Islamo how to behave, to the chagrin of Islamo who always want bad and who always rant they got discriminated.

The Bangala Muslim should soul search and behave themselves.

u-moon-chi-wei.jpg


Panthay Muslims protect their name

Although Mandalay Region has been the scene of tension between the Buddhist and Muslim communities, such as the violence in Meiktila one year ago, U Maung Maung Lay downplayed concerns that anti-Muslim prejudice affects the Panthay community.

He said the residents of the Panthay quarter on 80th Street worked hard to keep good relations with their Buddhist neighbours, and added that much of the anger ostensibly directed against Muslims was in fact aimed at ethnic Indians.

“There have always been frictions between the Indians [and the Myanmar],” he said, adding the Panthays managed to stay outside the fray.

“The new generation is proud of Panthay culture,” he said. “I call myself Panthay, but my heart is with Myanmar and the Panthays.”

This is just propaganda

The panthay are a small Mongoloid minority

The oppression by Burmese filth is against the Rohinga because they are muslim and a different ethnicity
 
.
This is just propaganda

The panthay are a small Mongoloid minority

The oppression by Burmese filth is against the Rohinga because they are muslim and a different ethnicity

Actually the Panthay (Hui) claim they are well treated in China well the Uyghur keep ranting victim of Han.

The harsh reality of China's Muslim divide - Al Jazeera English

The Panthay are also well treated in Thailand meanwhile thai malay islamo keep ranting they are fcuking victim and want to kill a lot of thai.


Islam in Modern Thailand: Faith, Philanthropy and Politics - Rajeswary Ampalavanar Brown - Google Books

The Barmese is not necessary against Islam and this whole thing may not have nothing to do with Islam. Probably the Buddhist and Rohingya conflict is due to certain bad elements who call themselves Buddhist and Muslims.
 
.
People name themselves at some time of history. Even some 60-70 years ago Bengali hindus didnt use to consider Bengali Muslims as Bengalis. They used to call us Muhammaden or Muslim or Arab only. Even today many hindus consider themselves Bengalis only. So wtf wrong with Myanmar? Why they dont want to give Muslim people citizenship who migrated before 1947. Whatever they call themselves. But they migrated during Marak U. Only @asad71 called those people migrated thousands of years ago. May be he has some source. Or @extra terrestrial can help in this.

But aung zaya you are going bersark with your propaganda and lies.
1.In his book, The Great Arab Conquests, Gen Sir Glub Pasha mentions that the monsoon winds was discovered in 50 BC by the Byzentine navigator Hiploatus. Thereafter began the east-west sea trade - between Canton and Aden. In the course of these journeys ships got lost, damaged,etc. Crew got sick. Local or older sailors were required for part of the journey. These resulted in Arabs and semi-Arab colonies coming up at particular points. Arakan coast upto modern Swandip was good halting place to collect additional merchandise from SA. Rich forests provided good timber for repairs and building new ships.
2.The local culture being matriarchal women married could not leave nor allow children to leave because of property issues. Local women preferred these adventurous Arabs over the local males who were lazy and always drunk. The situation has not changed. That is why the junta has made local women marrying Muslims unlawful.
3. During the life time of the Holy Prophet pbuh, he had sent his maternal uncle Sahabi Abu Waqqas to convey the Message to the eastern Arabs. He had stayed in Bengal-Arakan for eight years traveling between Akyab and Swandip to Sylhet.
4. Those who accepted the Message are Muslims, Masha Allah. They are Arakanese Muslims now being called the Rohingyas. Others remained Jews. And the Zionists are still looking for them in Mizoram and Burma.
 
.
@Aung Zaya .Why. did Burma allowed that genocide to happened in 1942?

nope.. not us...!! bro.. it's Britain..!! we got independence at 1948 from Britain.. :'(

Is this so simple? Chittagong is 90% muslim adjacent to northern arakan rohingya dominated area. Now suppose chittagong was part of Arakan now. As in the history Marak U ruled the place. Was it necessary for the chittagonian people to prove also they are migrant or original tribe?

ok..!! let's assume to say if Chittagong was part of Arakan As in the history Marak U ruled as u said.. .. i have a question..!! so-called Rohingya may be also original tribe of Bangladesh..!! if so why BD neeed to verify when we send these boat Bangladeshi to BD as they want..? coz they're also ur BD's tribe.. if so-called Rohingya choose BD.. will BD accept it's original tribe..?
 
.
nope.. not us...!! bro.. it's Britain..!! we got independence at 1948 from Britain.. :'(



ok..!! let's assume to say if Chittagong was part of Arakan As in the history Marak U ruled as u said.. .. i have a question..!! so-called Rohingya may be also original tribe of Bangladesh..!! if so why BD neeed to verify when we send these boat Bangladeshi to BD as they want..? coz they're also ur BD's tribe.. if so-called Rohingya choose BD.. will BD accept it's original tribe..?

We dont have any tribe system in BD. Any person who born in BD area since 1971 and who adopted BD citizenship since 1971 according to laws are Bangladeshi.
 
. .
We dont have any tribe system in BD. Any person who born in BD area since 1971 and who adopted BD citizenship since 1971 according to laws are Bangladeshi.

ok.. that's ur rule..!! right..? we also have our immigrantion Act..!! hence we will proceed according to our rule.. :D
 
. .
1.In his book, The Great Arab Conquests, Gen Sir Glub Pasha mentions that the monsoon winds was discovered in 50 BC by the Byzentine navigator Hiploatus. Thereafter began the east-west sea trade - between Canton and Aden. In the course of these journeys ships got lost, damaged,etc. Crew got sick. Local or older sailors were required for part of the journey. These resulted in Arabs and semi-Arab colonies coming up at particular points. Arakan coast upto modern Swandip was good halting place to collect additional merchandise from SA. Rich forests provided good timber for repairs and building new ships.
2.The local culture being matriarchal women married could not leave nor allow children to leave because of property issues. Local women preferred these adventurous Arabs over the local males who were lazy and always drunk. The situation has not changed. That is why the junta has made local women marrying Muslims unlawful.
3. During the life time of the Holy Prophet pbuh, he had sent his maternal uncle Sahabi Abu Waqqas to convey the Message to the eastern Arabs. He had stayed in Bengal-Arakan for eight years traveling between Akyab and Swandip to Sylhet.
4. Those who accepted the Message are Muslims, Masha Allah. They are Arakanese Muslims now being called the Rohingyas. Others remained Jews. And the Zionists are still looking for them in Mizoram and Burma.

Great...!!! the complete root of so-called rohingya bangali in 3 para.. LOL do u was there at that time..? if not.., plz point out.. where u bring thses facts..? didn't say i found them in my dream... :D :P
 
.
People name themselves at some time of history. Even some 60-70 years ago Bengali hindus didnt use to consider Bengali Muslims as Bengalis. They used to call us Muhammaden or Muslim or Arab only. Even today many hindus consider themselves Bengalis only. So wtf wrong with Myanmar? Why they dont want to give Muslim people citizenship who migrated before 1947. Whatever they call themselves. But they migrated during Marak U. Only @asad71 called those people migrated thousands of years ago. May be he has some source. Or @extra terrestrial can help in this.

But aung zaya you are going bersark with your propaganda and lies.

Well, according to Burma's 1982 citizenship law, any tribe arriving later than 1823 are foreigners but the documented presence of the "Rohingya/Rooinga" in the Arakan dates back to at least the late 1700s, (read “A Comparative Vocabulary of Some of the Languages Spoken in the Burma Empire,” by Francis Buchanan-Hamilton) while the presence of Muslims dates back to even earlier, some 1500 years back. That made the Burmese government to abandon the term "Rohingya" and refer to them as Bengalis and make them "legally illegal".

The population increase of the Muslims in Arakan (58,255 in 1871 to 178,647 in 1911) is nothing phenomenal as in those days Bengal and Arakan had a very high birth rate due to the fertile land, increasing three-folds in 40 years is nothing special. Besides, many Buddhists in Arakan also converted to Islam, for instance, you will find many Muslims having traditional Burmese surnames like Maung etc.

Bengalis did migrate to Burma during the British rule, but they were sent to serve in the government offices in Yangon (not Arakan), as Burma didn't have any modern education institutions that time, hence, the British couldn't recruit the locals. Many of them returned to the subcontinent in the aftermath of several anti-Indian riots.
 
.
Besides, many Buddhists in Arakan also converted to Islam, for instance, you will find many Muslims having traditional Burmese surnames like Maung etc.

LOL.. OK.. explaining naming system of Myanmar to Myanamr.. :D some may be.. but i deny the last word !! they just add another name to call easily in Myanmar community... dude..!! for instance.. My friend from Germany, a German , come Myanmar to meditate every year.. let's say.. his name is Gaius Cornelius . difficult to pronounce and not friendly in Myanmar.. hence he named himself U Kaung Kin( Sky ) to call easily in Myanmar... in this case.. his nationality and religion is not changed.. but just only his name..

the same thing was happened in Arakan..!! when these bangali shifted into Myanmar.. they just changed his name to communicate with local people smoothly.. some may convert.. But I deny the term " Many"...

(read “A Comparative Vocabulary of Some of the Languages Spoken in the Burma Empire,” by Francis Buchanan-Hamilton)

thz for ur book.. googling and will read it tonight..!! if i cant find in internet.. i hope u can share the source.. :D

Bengalis did migrate to Burma during the British rule, but they were sent to serve in the government offices in Yangon (not Arakan), as Burma didn't have any modern education institutions that time, hence, the British couldn't recruit the locals. Many of them returned to the subcontinent in the aftermath of several anti-Indian riots.

i have many sources to deny this fact... but i'm a little bit busy today... stay tune.. !!
 
. .
@Aung Zaya .Why. did Burma allowed that genocide to happened in 1942?
There was no Burma as such in 1942. It was been contested by the British and Japanese. The muslims took advantage of this lawless situation to exact a vendetta in 1942.

That has not been forgotten.

I'm glad that finally the world is seeing past the blatant bengali propaganda and lies to push their agenda of covertly expanding their border.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom