Nitish congratulated Modi after 2002

[GreenFoe]

NEW DELHI: Congratulating the BJP, its allies at the Centre on Sunday refuted suggestions of any "polarisation" of votes in Gujarat but said it was a verdict against the Congress.

"The people of Gujarat were aggrieved with the kind of image painted outside the state and hence reacted in this way," senior Samata party leader and Railway Minister Nitish Kumar said.




Claiming that there was no polarisation of votes between Hindus and Muslims, he said, "People are secular and they do not like any fundamentalists".





In a guarded reaction on the outcome of the polls, Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu said the people's verdict was final in a parliamentary form of democracy.

Gujarat victory - a verdict against Cong: BJP's allies - Times Of India

 

[SirHatesALot]

What is the point of this thread?

Every politician is opportunist.

 

[GreenFoe]

Nitish Kumar in May of 2002 on Ram Vilas Paswan’s opportunism over Gujarat 2002 riots



Railway minister and Samata Party leader Nitish Kumar has dubbed Lok Janshakti Party chief Ram Vilas Paswan “an opportunist who will join the Laloo bandwagon via Congress”. “Every political party has the right to make a decision. But Paswan’s decision had nothing to do with Gujarat. The Gujarat violence has been taking place for the last two months,” Kumar said, adding that Paswan’s exit from the NDA will have no impact in Bihar. “Paswan was trying to weaken the NDA even when he was in it,”


Nitish Kumar in December of 2002 on Narendra Modi’s victory in the state assembly elections



Congratulating the BJP, its allies at the Centre on Sunday refuted suggestions of any “polarisation” of votes in Gujarat but said it was a verdict against the Congress.

“The people of Gujarat were aggrieved with the kind of image painted outside the state and hence reacted in this way,” senior Samata party leader and Railway Minister Nitish Kumar said.

Claiming that there was no polarisation of votes between Hindus and Muslims, he said, “People are secular and they do not like any fundamentalists”.

Nitish Kumar in July of 2004



Briefing mediapersons following Mr. Lalu Prasad’s charge that he had not got the Godhra incident probed sufficiently, the former Railway Minister denied it and accused his successor of “acting irresponsibly.” “This is a political statement meant to address a particular community,” he said.



Nitish Kumar in January of 2005



“It is a political stunt but they (the Centre) should know that they cannot take advantage of the Gujarat riots again and again,” Kumar told reporters here when his reaction was sought on the report which was submitted to the Railway Board chairman R.K. Singh today.

Kumar, who was the Railway Minister when the mishap took place, said, “they (the Centre) will have to look for a new issue.”



Nitish Kumar February of 2005



The showing of CDs on the Gujarat riots by the RJD in Purnea and Kishanganj is in blatant violation of the EC directives as it is aimed at fomenting communal tension. I demand the EC to immediately ban it, JD(U) parliamentary party leader Kumar said.





Nitish Kumar December of 2007




Congratulating Narendra Modi for his victory in the assembly elections in Gujarat, Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar on Monday said Railway Minister and RJD supremo Lalu Prasad was happy over Modi’s victory as his importance in the UPA at the Centre would remain intact.

Describing as ‘spectacular’ Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi’s victory, Prasad said Congress’ defeat reflected ‘some flaws’ in the party’s electoral strategy which included nominating BJP rebels.

When exactly did Nitish Kumar develop the Modi allergy ? | Offstumped - Commentary on India

What is the point of this thread?

Every politician is opportunist.

Just to show the "lovers" of new born secular nitish

 

[Android]

with no conservative Hindu and general Muslim votes let's see how much his Maha Dalits can save him

 

[Ayush]

what??

 

[rashtriya.rifles]

NAMO for PM