Next War Between Pakistan and India? End Result?

[JF-17_Thunder]

What would be the end result of the next war between Pakistan and India? Mutually Assured Destruction for both nations? Please disucss military defensive and offensive measures/countermeasures.

Serious discussions no flame or trolling will be tolerated.

 

[graphican]

What would be the end result of the next war between Pakistan and India? Mutually Assured Destruction for both nations? Please disucss military defensive and offensive measures/countermeasures.

Serious discussions no flame or trolling will be tolerated.

Next war will be a limited war in the areas around Kashmir and Tibet. No Nuclear Weapons from either side and no mentionable strategics gains by either side but a lot more civil causalities would be observed. Looks like water would be reason of this war. Pakistan wouldn't be able to get Kashmir but India would loose more fingers of its hand on it.

Within months to a years time or so, the two sides will again engage into a war but this time, it will be NO Mercy from either side. That will be the 4th and decisiveness one.

There are 10s of predictions about that 4th war, even Mahatma Gandhi has mentioned about it. Try Googling it.

 

[into the wild]

there should not be any war

 

[graphican]

there should not be any war

This should happen in utopia but its World where we live in.

 

[Agni 5]

Next war will lead into some more(2-3) new countries on our western border.

 

[Kompromat]

If cold start remained in Place , we cannot rule out a preemptive Nuclear strike on India.

Cold start enables Indian forces to start a massive offensive against Pakistan and capture as much ground as they can before we could respond them.

In such a scenario it would be one Bloody war and Millions will die.

PS: Lets not hope for such a stupid war but work for peace that we all can live in prosperity and peace rather than fighting like Idiots.

 

[into the wild]

Next war will lead into some more(2-3) new countries on our western border.

that means 1) punjab 2) kashmir 3) rajhistan

good guess...

 

[Agni 5]

that means 1) punjab 2) kashmir 3) rajhistan

good guess...

We have completed our eastern side work 3 decades ago. This time we will take care of our western side. You are free to use the Indian states names to the new countries.

 

[into the wild]

We have completed our eastern side work 3 decades ago. This time we will take care of our western side. You are free to use the Indian states names to the new countries.

no, your home work is not completed , uve still got china in the east...

and forgoting bangladesh is not friendly with you..

 

[flyinfishjoe]

Serious discussions no flame or trolling will be tolerated.

Quoted just in case anyone forgot/forgets.


Anyways
To answer the question, I think the next war will be over water, and also be inconclusive.

 

[Neither Right Nor Wrong]

If cold start remained in Place , we cannot rule out a preemptive Nuclear strike on India.

Cold start enables Indian forces to start a massive offensive against Pakistan and capture as much ground as they can before we could respond them.

In such a scenario it would be one Bloody war and Millions will die.

PS: Lets not hope for such a stupid war but work for peace that we all can live in prosperity and peace rather than fighting like Idiots.

Unrealistic scenario, pre-empitive nuclear strike is carried out...when you are sure that you will be able to wipe out your enemy in first strike ..and their will be no second strike from the enemy or you have lost the conventional war and there is no future.

Plus Cold starts primary purpose is to fight a conventional war below nuclear threash holdboth countries ..that is why massive strike cores split in IBG, so that to make shallow incisions into enemy territory..not deep cuts.

 

[Time Assassin]

Nukes. Enough said.

 

[flyinfishjoe]

Nukes. Enough said.

I respectfully disagree. I think that international pressure and the knowledge of mutually assured destruction makes that unlikely.

 

[JF-17_Thunder]

Unrealistic scenario, pre-empitive nuclear strike is carried out...when you are sure that you will be able to wipe out your enemy in first strike ..and their will be no second strike from the enemy or you have lost the conventional war and there is no future.

Plus Cold starts primary purpose is to fight a conventional war below nuclear threash holdboth countries ..that is why massive strike cores split in IBG, so that to make shallow incisions into enemy territory..not deep cuts.

Pakistan is not Israel. It can handle several dozen nukes. You are being an overzealous by saying this. Pakistan has more nukes and more powerful nukes than India. You can't say India can wipe out Pakistan because Pakistan can do just the same. There wouldn't be no Pakistan and India not just no Pakistan.

World Military Ranking without factoring Nukes.

 

[Neither Right Nor Wrong]

Pakistan is not Israel. It can handle several dozen nukes. You are being an overzealous by saying this. Pakistan has more nukes and more powerful nukes than India. You can't say India can wipe out Pakistan because Pakistan can do just the same. There wouldn't be no Pakistan and India not just no Pakistan.

Did you actually bothered to read..what I wrote ??

How does having more nukes change the scenario..can Pakistan ensure destruction of India's second strike capabilities in it is premptive strike??