Naked Truth of Ayodhya Verdict : Analysis

[Chanakyaa]

Notable Points :

1. Court REJECTED "HINDU CLAIM" of NON EXISTANCE MASJID
2. Court ALSO REJECTED "MUSLIM CLAIM" of NON EXISTANCE of MANDIR

 

[Chanakyaa]

The Beautiful Part is that IT WAS A MUSLIM WHO GAVE PROOF of THE MANDIR & IT WAS A HINDU LAWYER WHO WAS FIGHTING FOR MUSLIM PARTY ! WOW !

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com...director-kk-muhammed/articleshow/71983225.cms

Chalo Maan lia.. Muslims in India are... being opressed.. But whats wrong with this HINDU ?

Meet Mr. Rajeev Dhavan... The HINDU Lawyer who fought for Muslims :

 

[Oracle]

The Beautiful Part is that IT WAS A MUSLIM WHO GAVE PROOF of THE MANDIR & IT WAS A HINDU LAWYER WHO WAS FIGHTING FOR MUSLIM PARTY ! WOW !

both were getting paid ... right ?

 

[Chanakyaa]

both were getting paid ... right ?

How many Muslims ( Read mulsim lawyer ) are willing to "get paid" and fight a case for Temple ( built after destruction of a Masjid ) in Pakistan ?

Will he even stay alive ?

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

both were getting paid ... right ?

Perhaps the Hindu lawyer was being paid but still to fight a case against the majority Hindus in a matter of deep faith for them, despite being a Hindu himself is a big deal.

 

[Chhatrapati]

both were getting paid

No. Only the Hindu lawyer is getting paid for putting up a case. KK Mohammed is an archaeologist from ASI, he can say whatever he wants and still get paid.

 

[Goenitz]

Everything is fabricated.
1. A land like this should be Govt Property like Lal Qila, Taj Mahal. I bet Taj mahal also has mosque so give it to Sunni Board?
2. Judges didn't publish their name.
3. it is not simple case of ownership but criminal case too. Anyway, what is a logic that if Hindus start worshiping in some area and 'believe' that it was sacred or birthplace of somebody, then give it to them !!!!! Like that dustbin they start worshiping.
4. No proof of mandir was found but a structure of 12th century. It can be s small hut/kutiya. Any idol, if found isn't big thing either. As every household has it so it could be one of them.
5. Lastly courts are intimidated. They do not want to be another Justice Loya.
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/no-probe-into-judge-bh-loyas-death-says-supreme-court-1892856

 

[Chanakyaa]

Everything is fabricated.
1. A land like this should be Govt Property like Lal Qila, Taj Mahal. I bet Taj mahal also has mosque so give it to Sunni Board?
2. Judges didn't publish their name.
3. it is not simple case of ownership but criminal case too. Anyway, what is a logic that if Hindus start worshiping in some area and 'believe' that it was sacred or birthplace of somebody, then give it to them !!!!! Like that dustbin they start worshiping.
4. No proof of mandir was found but a structure of 12th century. It can be s small hut/kutiya. Any idol, if found isn't big thing either. As every household has it so it could be one of them.
5. Lastly courts are intimidated. They do not want to be another Justice Loya.
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/no-probe-into-judge-bh-loyas-death-says-supreme-court-1892856

lol.

Very Very Very Detailed Proof :

https://www.epw.in/journal/2010/50/...s/was-there-temple-under-babri-masjid-reading

But hold on. We have no issues with what you want to belive... Please stick to your "Parallel" Universe.

 

[Goenitz]

@XiNiX
it is your own court verdict... That no evidence of mandir is found but just a structure.
Anyway, it would be better that instead of posting some blog link, post a news link of your court saying that 'Yes, Mosque was built on a Mandir...' etc

 

[Chhatrapati]

Everything is fabricated.
1. A land like this should be Govt Property like Lal Qila, Taj Mahal. I bet Taj mahal also has mosque so give it to Sunni Board?
2. Judges didn't publish their name.
3. it is not simple case of ownership but criminal case too. Anyway, what is a logic that if Hindus start worshiping in some area and 'believe' that it was sacred or birthplace of somebody, then give it to them !!!!! Like that dustbin they start worshiping.
4. No proof of mandir was found but a structure of 12th century. It can be s small hut/kutiya. Any idol, if found isn't big thing either. As every household has it so it could be one of them.
5. Lastly courts are intimidated. They do not want to be another Justice Loya.
https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/no-probe-into-judge-bh-loyas-death-says-supreme-court-1892856

1. Land surrounding the Babri masjid has legal owners, and the property dispute has been there even before India gained independence. Government cannot take over places of worship of any community. Taj Mahal is not a mosque but has mosque in it's complex hence Waqf board is ineligible. Ajmer Dargah is older than Babri Masjid it's not owned by government.
2. Judges : Ranjan Gogoi (CJI), S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, S Abdul Nazeer, Ashok Bhushan.
3. Criminal case related to demolition will continue. This is only dispute settlement. And this place has been in worship for hundreds of years as corroborated by written and archaeological evidences.
4. There has been evidences of temple found underneath, the court judgement omitted some ASI findings inorder to tone down and in line with sensitivities.
5. Supreme Court judges are not under any threat from the government, there is no evidence in any police investigation loya was killed.

 

[Chanakyaa]

@XiNiX
it is your own court verdict... That no evidence of mandir is found but just a structure.
Anyway, it would be better that instead of posting some blog link, post a news link of your court saying that 'Yes, Mosque was built on a Mandir...' etc

Well, If you have issues with comprehension no body can help. Watch the FIRST VIDEO. It has Proof and Analysis ONLY from the Court. Period.

Secondly, Ayodhya Land.. ( as the mulsim lawyer told above...) is like Makkah Madina for Hindus.

Suppose in Makka Madina .. Some Hindus.....Capture the Holy Land.. and Build a temple... Some centuries / years later.... a Muslim Group.. demolishes the Mandir.....and a Dispute starts if....there should be a mandir or masjid...

Now... The Court in Arabia.. rules it Must be a Mosque.. since Centuries Earlier ( the place which is definately the land of Extreme Mulsim Importance ) ...

Just like you....A Hindu says...."it is your own court verdict... That no evidence of Mosque is found but just a structure."

Laughable.. isnt it ? What would you reply to him... Its a Court's Verdict.

Do remember that We had a Muslim President, Muslim Missile Scientists... while in Your country.. Noble Leurates..are even deprived of being labeled as "Muslim" ..lol

 

[Gandhi G in da house]

How many Muslims ( Read mulsim lawyer ) are willing to "get paid" and fight a case for Temple ( built after destruction of a Masjid ) in Pakistan ?

Will he even stay alive ?

He would be declared.... Wajib ul Qatl.

 

[Greaves]

How many Muslims ( Read mulsim lawyer ) are willing to "get paid" and fight a case for Temple ( built after destruction of a Masjid ) in Pakistan ?

Will he even stay alive ?

yup just like the lawyer representing Asia Bibi accused of blasphemy and a landmark judgement by supreme court of Pakistan which refused to give in to the majoritarian public sentiments.And the state dealt with all the people heavy handedly who protested against this judgement.

 

[Goenitz]

Land surrounding the Babri masjid has legal owners

No man the trust is not owner. The case has lord Ram as petitioner, represented by Trust. Thus the trust getting land. By gathering at some place for 100 years with conviction that Ram was born there, doesn't make you owner. Anyway, I was born in Zhob at my maternal home and idk which floor, bed, time and exact same spot. I bet you don't know either but somehow pin location of lord Ram's birthplace is known.

ine with sensitivities.

That kills the notion that there is either harmony in community or there is no intimidation.

Supreme Court judges are not under any threat from the government

Then how the next judge exempted Amit from all previous charges so quickly.
@XiNiX
I admire you are perceiving as it was a case of multi-religious harmony and brotherhood etc. but it is too much of a bollywood script that Muslim representing Hindus, Hindus representing muslims. Sunnis were saying take land as goodwill gesture. Then the trust and Sunnis meet and declare before judgement that ''we will accept court decision whatever it will be''.

 

[hussain0216]

The ayody episode is a total example of how Jinnah was right

Jinnah foresaw Hindu extremism 70 years ago, he understood that hindus had 1000 years of Muslim domination and that has mentally damaged them

They could never be trusted as a majority to equally protect the rights of a massive Muslim minority thus PAKISTAN HAD TO BE MADE

today even Indian Muslims themselves understand Jinnah was right


The SC justified criminality and mob violence then rewarded the mob for their actions

This was a travesty of justice


And an example that the SC won't protect Muslims rights and to get justice Indian Muslims need to push for a partition


Today we must again thank Jinnah, Iqbal and all the father's of this country for UNDERSTANDING what had to be done


Also we must utilise the Indians actions as a tool to ensure IndianIndian Muslims, Kashmiris and other minorities understand what needs to be done
It's now or never