What's new

Must Read: How to write a Thought Provoking Article on pak in western media

kolaveri di

BANNED

New Recruit

Joined
Dec 18, 2011
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
How to write A 'Thought Provoking' Article like Pakistani columnist in western media.

In the crowded field of “South Asian Analysts”, many of whom have excellent credentials — like managing to be born in Pakistan or better still, having managed to visit Pakistan within the past five years — how does one get noticed? By writing thought provoking articles of course! And “thought provoking” gentle readers, is synonymous with “contrarian”. Or for the clueless, “thought provoking” means to vehemently disagree with accepted wisdom. But “thought provoking” articles should be written with care. What you disagree with doesn’t matter as much as when you disagree with it: Timing is everything!

“So how long should I wait, and what should I wait for” you ask? Fikar not. The wait is usually a couple of weeks and the incident can be one of: Ahmedis getting massacred, Shias getting shot, Interior minister declaring that he will kill Blasphemers with his own bare hands, MNAs going underground for proposing amendments to Blasphemy laws, murderers getting garlanded or Judges running away to Saudi Arabia (you get the idea). That is the right opportunity for you to bust out your column “Why Pakistan is still largely a moderate country”.

Many have done this, and many more will do this in the future. To save time and effort for everyone, I present for your gentle consideration: The “Pakistan is a moderate country” column generator!! The formula itself is very simple: Riveting opening sentence, intriguing provocation of thought, religious mumbo jumbo, meaningless statistics, blame Zia, guilt out the west, demand money, cashmere or both.

So here it goes. The opening sentence should be riveting (choose one)


Pakistan is:

1) A country usually mentioned in the same breath as the Taliban.
2) Viewed synonymously with Osama Bin Laden.
3) Thought of as a cesspit of Blasphemy laws, Coups, Nuclear weapons and Jihadis


Most people will be tempted to end the article right here.


But dont!! Brave analyst, you should plod on!! Don’t forget that we aren’t stating facts, we are disagreeing with them! The second sentence should turn the premise around and be thought provoking (choose one):

But could it be:

1) That Pakistan is in fact a moderate, secular democracy founded on rule of law?
2) That the problems commonly associated with Pakistan started only as recently as 1947?
3) Nothing but propaganda by Zionist-RAW-CIA controlled western press?
4) That the problems facing Pakistan are completely misconstrued?

Now these two sentences set up the right platform to stake your credentials as a Pakistani. “But I don’t know anything about the core cultural zeitgeist of the country!” you say? Not to worry. Nobody reading your column does either. The trick is to act confident and informed (choose one):

1) The religious violence in Pakistan is perpetrated by a small minority of Wahhabis while the bulk of the country follows the Berelvi sect of Islam known for its tolerance and plurality (Please *DO NOT* mention that Qadri was a Berelvi).
2) Most people visit the graves of mystic saints who were clean shaven.
3) The call for prayers co-exist with vibrant cultural scenes in Karachi, with girls in tight jeans under their shuttlecock burkhas, art festivals, book readings (inside well fortified, double cavity searched British consulate, but it is best not mentioned here).

Next is the time for some statistics (choose one)

The so-called conservative Pakistanis:

1) Overwhelmingly vote for secular parties with less than 10% voting for religious parties.

Where are my choices you ask? YOU MORON!! YOU DONT HAVE A CHOICE!! THIS STATISTIC SHOULD BE MENTIONED IN EVERY ARTICLE ARGUING THAT PAKISTAN IS MODERATE!! Now that we are past statistics, go on to blame Zia (choose one):


It was Zia who:
1) Started a process of Islamization of the society
2) Declared Ahmedis to be non-Muslims *(see end note)
3) Stopped PTV anchors from dressing up stylishly in sarees

Next is guilt trip!

And Zia was co-opted by the west for their Jihad against the Soviets. (To be mentioned in every article)

The next is the clincher

So what should the west do?

1) They should support the fledgling democracy in Pakistan with adequate economic support.
2) Strike a grand bargain involving Cashmere for peace in Afghanistan to demonstrate their seriousness among ordinary Pakistanis.
3) Encourage close economic linkages with the west through a liberal visa regime, relaxed trade quotas and co-operation in the nuclear field.

(Choose ALL of them).


So putting it all together, here is an example of “Pakistan is a moderate country” column I put together:


Pakistan is a country usually mentioned in the same breath as the Taliban. But could it be that Pakistan is in fact a moderate, secular democracy founded on rule of law? The religious violence in Pakistan is perpetrated by a small minority of Wahhabis while the bulk of the country follows the Berelvi sect of Islam known for its tolerance and plurality. The so-called conservative Pakistanis overwhelmingly vote for secular parties with less than 10% voting for religious parties. It was Zia who started a process of Islamization of the society. And Zia was co-opted by the west for their Jihad against the Soviets. For a safe and secure future of the world, the west should support the fledgling democracy in Pakistan with adequate economic support. Strike a grand bargain involving Cashmere for peace in Afghanistan to demonstrate their seriousness among ordinary Pakistanis and encourage close economic linkages with the west through a liberal visa regime, relaxed trade quotas and co-operation in the nuclear field.

Please submit your “Pakistan is a moderate country” in western press!!

________________________________________
*It was actually ZAB who declared Ahmedis to be non-muslims, but remember that we are disagreeing with facts here, not stating them!
 
. . .
Boy, you should post this in the stupid and funny thread. Because outside of it, this seems like serious stuff that will make moderators delete it and ban you.
 
. . .
Actually its quite funny.. although the sarcasm is off.. as Pakistan is a mixture of firebrand secularists.. liberal Mullahs.. and a dumb majority that cant decide whether its moderate ,extremist or secularist and jumps from boat to boat in search of some identity.
 
.
Most racist and ignorant trash by an indian, mods this person deserves to be banned for life. You have never been to pakistan, and you talk like you know more than us.
 
.
Most racist and ignorant trash by an indian, mods this person deserves to be banned for life. You have never been to pakistan, and you talk like you know more than us.

Why?

Havent you heard of onion news? Do misplaced sarcasm so everyone can laugh at you and say.. "Ah.. what humor.. so detached from reality yet so convincingly real"
 
. .
.
.
Interpretation of Islamic Extremism by the western mass media by by Zara Hafeez

When we discuss ‘Islamic Extremism’, there are various factors that need to be looked into before reaching a conclusion, regarding how the western mass media has ‘manipulated’ and ‘exploited’ their understanding of what Islamic Extremism is all about and how it in turn has had an impact on the Muslim world.

To begin with, Islam is the fastest growing religion in the West. Nonetheless, the West has many stereotypes and false impressions about Islam that are due to the media, prejudice and ignorance. In many cases, the media’s reports about Islam are incorrect due to primal unawareness. This is one of the reasons as to why the West often hates Islam and depicts it in an illusion of revulsion through its media.
The major factor which contributes to Islamic stereotyping in the West is due to the lack of knowledge media has when it comes down to selecting their words that portray Muslims in general. Some very frequently heard or seen names and words in the news relating to Muslims are “extremist” or “terrorist”. These words are ambiguous and misleading; moreover serve to be completely anti-Islamic. The Western media seldom uses impartial terms such as “revivalist” or “progressives”. It also creates the notion that Muslims are “returning” to Islam. This of course in all forms is not true in most cases, since most Muslims have never left Islam in the first place. Islam has always been a huge part of their lives. A more correct and just way to express this idea is by suggesting that there is a revival of Islam and that it is becoming more and more influential around everyone.

In addition to the fact that media creates erroneous ideas about Islam, the Western media is also very powerful to its audiences in making negative Islamic stereotypes, such as the allegation that all Muslims are fundamentalists. The term “fundamentalist” is actually a term that is interpreted by the media. Whereas a fundamentalist, in fact, only symbolizes a normal Muslim who follows his or her religion.

Fundamentalism means an approach, an effort or a movement that an ideology, group or religion tries to promote in its fundamental beliefs. Although the Western media is clearly uncomfortable with religious groups, yet it focuses profoundly on “Islamic fundamentalism”. A majority of the media’s reports that talk about Islamic fundamentalism commonly illustrate most Muslims as extremists. This goes on to showing how the media has become ignorant if not preconceived. The media most often represents Muslim "fundamentalists" prostrating themselves before God in prayer. For instance, in the October 4 issue of Time, Muslims soldiers were shown performing prayers with guns. The caption on the bottom of the picture said, "Guns and prayer go together in the fundamentalist battle". The part that the reporters omitted or failed to state was that the Muslim soldiers were praying on a battlefield in Afghanistan. Common sense of the situation meant that the soldiers had to remain armed at all times in case of an ambush at any time. This is a clear example of the Western media’s bias and erroneous reporting.

With an observation on the soldiers, another great mistaken belief that exists is the truth about Jihad or "holy war" in Islam. The ideas of war and hostility have become related to the Islamic religion from the media. Jihad is so often evident in the news because the media thinks it is Islam’s rationalization for war and violence. Jihad factually means “The struggle in the path of God.” Conversely the Western media literally abuses the definition of jihad by labelling it as a holy war where Muslims unreasonably slaughter non-believers. But the fact is that jihad can mean a number of things that a Muslim does for the sake of God. Hardly ever has the Western media used this kind of an explanation in their respective reports. The Western media repeatedly takes the word “jihad” out of the context only to propagate negative views on Islam.

The association of Islam and violence is a common misconception that the general Western public has urbanized about Islam. An example of this kind of delusion is that the Western media and some historians often say that Islam was a religion spread by the sword, meaning that Muslims went from one end of the world to the other forcing people to either convert or to die.

Since majorities of the American public only get their information about Islam through the media, they believe this wrong idea. The media’s reports about Arab or "Islamic" events, such as the Gulf War, are often misapprehended. The media usually fails to give background information about these Islamic events that it reports on. The media occasionally differentiates between the religion Islam and the political affairs that occur in most Islamic countries. For instance, what Saddam Hussein, the president of Iraq, did in the Gulf War was not Islamic and totally wrong (to attack other people for no reason, especially Muslims). But the media still makes reports about Islam and how Islam is made of war-crazed people. For example, to help put things into perspective, Hitler was a person of the Christian faith. This does not mean that all of his actions were consistent with the Christian beliefs. Likewise, Saddam Hussein is of the Islamic faith, but all of his actions do not necessarily represent Islam. So you can see that the media’s reports about "war-crazed Muslims" are incorrect. The notion of associating of Islam and Muslims with the terms Arabs and Middle East are in fact misleading. Arabs only account for 18% of the Muslim population across the world.

Aside from the fact that the Western media indeed pulls the wool over our eyes, the media is also a profit-seeking organization which often seeks to create a false image of reality. Islam is often news of an obnoxious sort for the general public of the United States and other western countries. Islam has often been presented as a peril or a danger to the West. These negative images do not match up to Islam, but are the belief of certain sectors of a particular society. These prominent sectors can transmit negative images of Islam, which sometimes influences people’s views on Islam. The Western media actually weakly represents Islam. Most of these problems of meagre representations come from poor language translations, the absence of developed news agencies with international networks and native reporters, and biased reporting by many Western reporters.

A few predisposed reports come from negative images that have happened in the Muslim world in the past like the hijacking of airplanes by Palestinians, the occupation of the United States Embassy by students in Tehran, the fact that there are no democratic governments in most Islamic countries, and the Gulf War. For most of these events, the media has misinterpreted and misrepresented them. The media sometimes involuntarily blows things out of proportion, sometimes because of prejudiced sentiments towards Muslims. Nevertheless, many positive developments in the Muslims world seldom go into observation.

With the Western media’s spotlight and some Western government approach, the West is a place where Islam is a name of negativity. The Western media has contributed a great amount to this devastating negative and downbeat image of Islam. The media often misrepresents and imprecisely explains Islam and its materializations. Occasionally the media seems to be biased against Islam. When the media twists the image of Islam, the general public tends to believe it, because the media is a major source of information that the public gets about Islam. This ignorance that the West accumulates from the media leads them into making stereotypes about Islam and associating all Muslims and Arabs together. The West often times views Islam as "fundamental" "extremist" or "bigoted", but all of these terms have been manoeuvred, purposely because of predisposed feelings and fortuitously because of ignorance, by the media to present a rather negative image about Islam
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom