What's new

Musharraf: Never trained terrorists against India

graphican

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
12,433
Reaction score
48
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia

Musharaf after making a "mad" comment about Kashmir and the role of Pakistan in it, has tried to clarify things. I hope he stays on his statements this time.

Also note his stance that nothing was done during his tenure but before that.. So he is picking nose from one cheek and is putting on the other!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.

Barkha: The counter argument of course, and not to get trapped in that India- Pakistan stalemate, but the counter argument of course is that there is terrorism being imported across the Line of Control (LoC). Now, I want to ask you something about what you said this past week in an interview to a German magazine that grabbed Indian eyeballs at least. An admission for the first time of the world's worst kept secret: that there are underground militant groups, not just trained in camps in Pakistan, but also sent across the LoC as the Pakistan army looks the other way. You have since said that you were misquoted, but many people believe that you actually s***e the truth. You never shied away from speaking the truth. When you were president, you actually tried to reduce infiltration across the LoC and those numbers have come down. So why renege on speaking the truth? Why are you trying to come back from what you said very honestly?

Musharraf: No, I didn't say that they were. I said certain things which were taken as such. Now first of all saying that I was doing that, first of all that argument has to be killed. Mujahideen groups came into being after the freedom struggle in Kashmir started in 1989, Lashkar-e-Toiba, Hizbul Mujahideen are products of 1991...

Barkha: But Lashkar-e-Toiba is not an indigenous Kashmiri group. It's a terrorist...

Musharraf: But what I'm trying to prove is, associating me with doing that. I was nothing in 1991; I was a brigadier, so I could not in that interview certainly be saying that I was; my government was doing this. We came into being in 1999-2000. When Lakshar-e-Toiba, Hizbul Mujahideen, Jaish-e- Mohammed... when all this and many others came into being in the 1990s. Now many of them, Hizbul Mujahideen started from Kashmir.

Barkha: What is the Lakshar-e-Toiba as a group for you? For India it's a terrorist organisation. For you what is it?

Musharraf: We will enter into a debate, where one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.

Barkha: So is the Lakshar-e-Toiba a freedom fighter group for you?

Musharraf: From our point of view anyone who is fighting in Kashmir, your part of Kashmir, is a Mujahid who's fighting for the freedom, for the rights of the people of Kashmir.

Barkha: Using acts of terror that often see innocent women, children killed?

Musharraf: As...as...as.. just a minute, as enshrined in the UN Charter, by the UN recognized as a dispute, okay. Now the other part: Terrorism; they are fighting against the Indian Army and Indian Army is killing the civilians. So who is the terrorist? Isn't the Indian Army also a terrorist then? I think we are going to enter into a discussion where you won't prove anything, I also won't prove anything.

Barkha: I want to go beyond this because you have s***en extremism and terrorism being the key challenges before Pakistan, and the reason I ask about LeT is because after the Mumbai attacks of 26/11, we have the David Headley confessions or the interrogation report and we have independent CIA reports and they all talking about the involvement of the LeT and some say some even backing from not just sections of the ISI but even army majors who have been named in the Mumbai attacks. Now what do the Mumbai attacks have to do with Kashmir, and the LeT has been implicated in the Mumbai attacks.

Musharraf: Okay... Now yes I was talking of the history in the 1990s, these organisations came into being and they had great public sympathy. Everyone in Pakistan knew it, every individual in Pakistan knew that people are volunteering to go and they are going into Kashmir to fight the Indian Army.

Barkha: With the covert help of the Pakistan establishment?

Musharraf:No, I never said that. This is the point I was making. I never said that.

Barkha: How did they get across the Line of Control?

Musharraf: Have you been to the LoC?

Barkha: Often. And I know it is porous of course. I know it's porous.

Musharraf: If even I go there today, at this age, even I will be able to cross; nobody will be able to detect me. I will be able to infiltrate and go deep inside okay. Because there are gaps and it's a porous border. It's a mountain area and the more north you go, and if you are capable of walking in the snow you can go across anywhere. Right? So they are capable of doing it and they are motivated and indoctrinated. People are themselves... they don't need training - they themselves want to go; they want to learn and want to go. The turn came when I came on the scene in 1999-2000, and then 9/11 also happened. These people turned their guns inwards, towards Pakistan and me. Right? There were suicide attacks on me. That's because I joined the coalition forces in Afghanistan, took a decision to join. And they turned their gun on me and that is before 9/11, I had bent many of the organisations. Right? But fighting against the Indian Army in Kashmir we call them Mujahideen, and we need to settle the Kashmir dispute because its enshrined in the UN, it's a dispute recognised by the UN.

Barkha: Many people believe - on both sides, that your famous four point formula for Kashmir remains the only pragmatic template within which Kashmir can be resolved. Do you feel a little upset that the Pakistan People's Party (PPP) government has kind of dismissed the theory, that this came quite close to a solution, and how close - if you can share more details with us than you have in the past. How close did our countries come to a solution?

Musharraf: You said it and let me tell you very proudly, those parameters are mine. I thought of them, because I realised that when I was talking to everyone on Pakistan side, the Indian side, the dispute is the Kashmir dispute. What is the solution? Not one of them ever gave me a solution. So therefore, that set me thinking, and that is where I came into this issue of demilitarisation, maximum self governance, this over-watch and all that, and making the LoC irrelevant. Now you asked me how close we were, we were as close as drafting the final agreement.

Barkha: Were there drafts shared on both sides?

Musharraf: Yes, of course, through back channel. Yes, we were discussing. Some good English was required; I wish you were there to form some sentences.

Barkha: What was the block? Why did it suddenly fall through? Why did it not go through? Why is the present government denying the existence of any such draft?

Musharraf: Who is denying?

Barkha: When we pose this question to the PPP government in Pakistan they say there is no paper.

Musharraf: What does your government say?

Barkha: I think our government indicates that this four point formula was a template and we were almost there.

Musharraf: I mean frankly I don't want to get involved in that. I've told you...(Interrupted by Barkha)

Barkha: No. Where did it fall through? What was the stumbling block?

Musharraf: As I said we were drafting and in fact on the other two issues we could have signed any day.

Barkha: Which were the other two issues?

Musharraf: Siachen, and Sir Creek, we could have signed any day. We carried out the joint survey by the two navies of the Sir Creek area and we know exactly the disputed area in the land and in the sea. A joint survey and we could have reached an agreement. On Siachen, where we needed to withdraw the forces and the demiliatrised zone, we could have reached an agreement. I mean if the two leaders decide to sign they will, they can, and Kashmir was the issue....

Barkha: How close did it come on Kashmir? Was there a specific draft on Kashmir in the back channels, or given your four point formula?

Musharraf: Well it was being formed. The draft was being formulated, that is the good thing, and it was being formulated in good spirit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
He'll be on another interview on ABC tomorrow at 10:00AM.

But you guys don't have ABC, so :P.
 
.
i think this is a duplicate thread.
and Musharraf is a popular figure.
 
.
Also note his stance that nothing was done during his tenure but before that.. So he is picking nose from one cheek and is putting on the other!

That should have been so obvious that he shouldn't have had to say it. Many bhartis were claiming that it was happening during his time. Incredibly stupid to say that considering how much infiltration decreased.
 
.
Can someone guide me to the rest of the interview ?
He was about to say something on 26/11 and the topic got diverted.
 
.
That should have been so obvious that he shouldn't have had to say it. Many bhartis were claiming that it was happening during his time. Incredibly stupid to say that considering how much infiltration decreased.

India is our declared, undisputed enemy.. it will cook if given the food. Its not anybody else's but fault of our own people who give them opportunity to "think stupid". Why the holly hell Musharaf made this statement about Kashmir and role of Pakistan in it? It was totally unasked for, unthoughtful and think particularly wrongly timed. It harmed Pakistan's stance on Kashmir and also the genuine struggle of Independence by Kashmiris themselves.
 
. .
Why the holly hell

Because after the Kargil experience, he realised that war is not the solution (be it proxy or open) and that too against a country much more powerful (at least in conventional military) than his own.

Peace and Friendship with India is Pakistan's only best bet and Mushy realised that after Kargil.
 
. .
India is our declared, undisputed enemy.. it will cook if given the food. Its not anybody else's but fault of our own people who give them opportunity to "think stupid". Why the holly hell Musharaf made this statement about Kashmir and role of Pakistan in it? It was totally unasked for, unthoughtful and think particularly wrongly timed. It harmed Pakistan's stance on Kashmir and also the genuine struggle of Independence by Kashmiris themselves.

If you happen to see the vedio above and read the interview at Spiegel's website you may very well get your answer.
He is out their facing the media war against Pakistan.
He is not making statements rather he is answering questions.
India is indeed not friendly to Pakistan and are those friendly to Pakistan who give them covert and overt transit aid.... why the holly hell we do that for??
 
Last edited:
.
OOOPPS...


Musharraf's U-turn: Never trained terrorists against India - The Times of India

LONDON: India and Pakistan had almost reached an agreement on Kashmir issue, said Pakistan's former president Pervez Musharraf, and tried to clarify his earlier remarks on training militants by stressing many "motivated" outfits had existed before he came to power.

"We were as close as drafting the final agreement," Musharraf said, referring to a four-point formula floated by him in December 2006, which included phased demilitarisation of Jammu and Kashmir, maximum self-governance, joint supervision by India and Pakistan and softening of the Line of Control (LoC).

Speaking in London, the former military ruler said the draft of the resolution was also shared and discussed between both sides "through back channel".

"We were drafting and in fact on the other two issues (Siachen and Sir Creek) we could have signed any day," he said. "We carried out the joint survey by the two navies of the Sir Creek area and we know exactly the disputed area in the land and in the sea."

The former president, who came to power by overthrowing the civilian government of the then prime minister Nawaz Sharif in a bloodless coup in 1999, also sought to clarify his earlier statement in which he had admitted that Pakistani army was involved in training militants and sending them across the border.

Musharraf said due to prevalence of anti-India sentiment, people "themselves" are "motivated" and "indoctrinated" to cross the border "because there are gaps and it's a porous border".

"They don't need training. They themselves want to go. They want to learn and want to go," he said, arguing terrorist outfits such as Lashker-e-Taiba (LeT), Hizbul Mujahideen and Jaish-e-Mohammed existed much before he came to power.

"Great public support, great public sympathy among the people of Pakistan gave rise to all of them," he said, adding, "Everyone individual in Pakistan knew that people are volunteering to go and they are going into Kashmir to fight the Indian Army."

In an interview to German magazine Der Spiegel earlier this week, Musharraf had said that militant groups "were indeed formed" to fight India in Kashmir. And "the government turned a blind eye because they wanted India to discuss Kashmir".
 
.
Of course, Musharraf clearly said "We turned a blind eye" towards the training camps of militant freedom fighters that already existed. He never said anything about training by Pakistan government.

I challenge anyone to quote Musharraf where he said "Yes we trained terrorists" as were the headlines when he said the we turned a blind eye comment.
 
.
Of course, Musharraf clearly said "We turned a blind eye" towards the training camps of militant freedom fighters that already existed. He never said anything about training by Pakistan government.

I challenge anyone to quote Musharraf where he said "Yes we trained terrorists" as were the headlines when he said the we turned a blind eye comment.

The Indian Orange Media had attributed lies to Musharraf churned out by itself in the past too.


I am not surprised this time too so i dint bother much to post in that thread
 
. .

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom