What's new

Mumbai Case

.
No matter ISI is involved or not,Pakistan Govt with consent of its security institutions(ISI & Army) want to investigate Mumbai Attacks.
They had arrested all the accused but india did not provided the solid proofs so Hafiz Saeed got bail,remaining are still in custody.India is not allowing Pakistani judicial mission and investigators to record the statements from Kasab and eye witnesses.These proofs are needed here in the court of Pakistan.Pakistani courts accepts statement recorded by only its megistrates as Indian courts.
So forget about every conspiracy theory and India should help Pakistan in punishing killers of innocent people.

before anyone talk about Divid headley Plz do a little researh about his past he had served for FBI not for ISI
 
. .
india doesnt even give any proofs and starts blaming Pakistan,

---------- Post added at 06:50 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:49 AM ----------

and lol are they gonna produce fake evidence
 
.
India said Friday it was disappointed by a U.S. jury’s verdict on Chicago businessman Tahawwur Hussain Rana, who was found guilty on two terror counts—providing material support to a terror conspiracy and to a Pakistan militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba—but acquitted on the charge of helping to plot the Mumbai 2008 terror attacks.

“It may be recalled that evidence was produced in the U.S. court that David Headley had advised Rana of his assignment to scout potential targets in India,” said a statement from India’s home ministry. “We are, therefore, disappointed that Rana was acquitted on the count of conspiracy to provide material support to the Mumbai terrorist attacks.”

The statement said India’s National Investigation Agency, which was set up after the Mumbai attacks, will examine the documents and evidence from the U.S. case before deciding whether to try to prosecute David Coleman Headley, who was the key prosecution witness in the case, and Mr. Rana in India.

It suggested that a prosecution in India—which does not have a jury system—could result in a different verdict.

“It must be remembered that Rana was tried in a U.S. court in accordance with U.S. law,” said the home ministry. “Criminal trials in the U.S. are jury trials and there are special rules governing such jury trials.”

It’s possible that the verdict may again reopen old wounds between India and the U.S. over Mr. Headley, who was arrested in Chicago in 2009. Some in India have questioned whether the U.S. should have shared the intelligence it had on Mr. Headley, a U.S. citizen born to an American mother and a Pakistani father, with India sooner. Ahead of U.S. President Barack Obama’s trip to India in November, India’s home minister, Palaniappan Chidambaram, had to respond to repeated queries from the press on revelations U.S. federal agents received a tip before the attacks that Mr. Headley was training with Lashkar-e-Taiba, the militant outfit that orchestrated the terrorist rampage.

Mr. Headley, who pleaded guilty in March last year on 12 terror-related counts, had admitted to scouting out locations for the Mumbai attacks, and testified in the Rana case that his friend assisted him. In return, U.S. prosecutors agreed not to seek the death penalty.

This could make it difficult for authorities in India, where the death penalty is on the books, to seek his extradition.

India previously tried the lone surviving gunman of the 10 terrorists who waged a three-day attack on the country’s financial hub, firing on people at the main train station, two five-star hotels, a tourist café and a Jewish center, killing more than 160 people. In May last year he was convicted on dozens of charges and sentenced to death. He is presently in jail in Mumbai.

India
 
. .
BJP wants Chicago court order on Rana is challenged

New Delhi, Jun 10 (PTI) BJP today said the government should ensure that the US prosecuting agencies challenge a Chicago court''s acquittal of Tahawwur Rana of the charge of plotting the 2008 Mumbai terror attack. The party sought to know if a deal was struck between American investigating agency FBI and Pakistan''s ISI which led to Rana getting a clean chit on 26/11 attacks but convicted for helping terror group LeT. BJP claimed it was "curious and odd" that though Rana has been found guilty of conspiracy with LeT, an internationally banned terrorist organisation, and involved in terrorist attack in Denmark, he was acquitted in 26/11. The party wondered if all the prosecution evidence had been presented properly by FBI in the court and asked if the government of India ensured that the US prosecution agencies pursued it properly. "The country is certainly entitled to know whether acquittal of Rana was part of a deal between FBI and ISI. This question is very critical because ISI was clearly in the dock.Surely, the entire operation would not have been executed under the overall command of ISI''s Major Iqbal alone," BJP chief spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said. BJP maintained senior ISI officials as well as sections of the Pakistan military must have been involved. It insisted that this would have been exposed, causing serious embarrasment to ISI. However, the suspicion and apprehension of its involvement still exists, it added. "We demand that government of India must properly examine the entire matter and ensure that as per US law an appeal is filed by the prosecution agencies against Rana," BJP said. PTI RC PAL
BJP wants Chicago court order on Rana is challenged, IBN Live News

They are determined towards embarrassment.

Nobody cares about 26/11 anymore. :lol::lol:

ISI is involved in above verdict.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom