Why do you assume the worst about us? Why would we use force? Have you seen any evidence of any? They will see that they are the same as us as they get better integrated with the rest of us and lose their persecutionary parnoia as a throwback to the Islam khatr mein line from Partition continuing to this day. For that to happen, the environment needs to be conducive, and the mind needs to be free of baggage. Hopefully both will happen.
Rant wasn't needed.
Simple logic - they see themselves as
different, not
separate - them seeing themselves as different does not mean paranoia nor does it threaten your national integrity, so chill out a little.
What's wrong with seeing themselves as the same?
Nothing - but they
don't. And there's nothing wrong with that either.
Oh really? Do Sanatan Dharma-following regular Hindus pray Salah five times a day? Do they believe in the Prophet Muhammad?
Indian Muslims do - thus, Indian Muslims are different. It's completely nonsensical to say that Indian Muslims' and Hindus' (or Sanatan Dharmic people, or whatever you want to call them) religions are the same.
They are not. That is a Pakistani talking. Understandable, because that is the plinth on which Pakistan was created and you ceased to be Indian.
Most Muslims would say the same, regardless of being Pakistani. Unless you believe that all Muslims were once Hindu (in which case you may aswell declare the whole world to be Hindu), your argument is invalid.
But these are the inheritors of that part of Indic Hindu Islam which never bought into that warped theory.
What exactly is ''Indic Hindu Islam''?
They see their faith as different. They never saw themselves as different. We are going to show them that their faith regardless, they always have been and will continue to be Hindu.
Their faith is different - I never meant to say they were a different species or ethnicity or nationality or anything, of course they're Indians. Indian Muslims are Indian.
This is not about divisive identity. This is about cohesive inclusive oneness. This is not about religion. This is about civilization. About our historic heritage. A proud living heritage.
Different religious identities should not be considered as 'divisive'. Unity does not mean uniformity - it means the ability to overlook differences. I never questioned your historic heritage - I simply asked one question : why does your historic heritage/civilization/national unity have to be called Hindu? Why not simply use the word ''Indian'' to avoid confusion with the set of religious beliefs with the same name? Either that or officially rename your country to Hindustan, because for the rest of the world ''Hinduism'' is a religion, not a historic heritage.
And that need never clash with them following Islam.
So Hinduism is compatible with Islam, is that what you're trying to say? One simple question then: In your opinion, is the slaughter of cows allowed in Hinduism or not?
We have a hugely more massive sense of national unity and cultural pride than you guys.
Debatable.
Let us decide for ourselves what is pointless.
Go ahead, who's stopping you? Like I said before:
