Mitsubishi F-1 and F-2. Post WW2 Japanese fighter planes.

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Pathetic and how please explain, Just enlargement of F-16 optimised for anti ship role @undertakerwwefan


are you completely blind @undertakerwwefan

Look at the rear flaps. It's not even close.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Look at the rear flaps. It's not even close.

So, that's is reason you talking its completely different from F-16 @undertakerwwefan , its minor difference , Still based on F-16 @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

So, that's is reason you talking its completely different from F-16 @undertakerwwefan , its minor difference , Still based on F-16 @undertakerwwefan

F-2 is NOT based on F-16.

 

[Ultima Thule]

F-2 is NOT based on F-16.

Then explain why @undertakerwwefan

F-2 is NOT based on F-16.

Because your pathetic brain don't accept the real facts, you thick head @undertakerwwefan

 

[Yongpeng Sun-Tastaufen]

Then explain why @undertakerwwefan

Mitsubishi. Why don't you go ask them.

 

[Ultima Thule]

Mitsubishi. Why don't you go ask them.

What a bogus logic you have @undertakerwwefan in your op article its states that Lockheed Martin/ Mitsubishi have joint production line for F-2 60% from Lockheed Martin, 40% from Mitsubishi @undertakerwwefan you're completely blind and insane, Mitsubishi/Japan purchased the design of Enlarged F-16 and Rename as F-2 @undertakerwwefan

 

[SQ8]

https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/products/f-2.html

Mitsubishi. Why don't you go ask them.

Why should he? The idiotic claim is entirely yours and it is on YOU to prove something both Mitsubishi and Lockheed Martin put on their official websites.

So compared to someone like you who knows jack about weapons system except copying and pasting pointless Russian propoganda along with senseless opinions, Everyone is better off trusting the multi-billion dollar weapons company that actually makes the Jet

Thead closed for being posted out of sheer idiocy