RAOSaifullah
FULL MEMBER
New Recruit
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2008
- Messages
- 45
- Reaction score
- 0
ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court observed on Tuesday that the highly emotive issue of missing persons was posing greater challenges to democracy than any judicial verdict.
The government should be aware of the consequences of missing person cases which is bigger than the NRO (National Reconciliation Ordinance) for it affects every citizen of the country, said Justice Mohammad Sair Ali, a member of the three-judge bench hearing the cases of missing persons.
Even if my son had been picked, I would also be standing outside the court demanding early release of the child, Justice Sair said.
Justice Javed Iqbal, who is heading the bench, deplored that although the government had stated before the court that it would not defend the NRO, an upheaval had been created after the verdict that upset the entire country.
Whenever the Supreme Court is about to take any step, it is told by the government that democracy is in great danger. Democracy does not mean that everybody should be above all limits, Justice Iqbal observed. The basic problem of Balochistan could not be solved unless the issue of missing people was settled, he added.
The court asked Attorney General Anwar Mansoor to contact ministers and secretaries of defence and interior and heads of intelligence agencies to locate missing persons. It decided to hold day-to-day proceedings on the matter after two weeks. The attorney general assured the court that no uncalled for adjournments would be sought by the government in future, but sought eight to 10 weeks time.
He said that about 810 institutions were involved in the issue and he would have to meet them individually because all of them were reluctant to share information at joint meetings.
Justice Iqbal said that action would be taken this time against top officials, instead of merely booking petty officials, adding that it would be an exercise in futility if we start from the bottom by calling officers like inspectors general, section officers or mohrars.
This time we have to start from the top by calling ministers and secretaries and the heads of intelligence agencies, the court said.
Where is the order to pick a person? At least someone must have issued instructions in this regard, Justice Raja Fayyaz said, adding that every institution had some framework and the government should look after the families of missing people.
People have expectations from the Supreme Court which has rendered more sacrifices than others for the cause of democracy, Justice Iqbal observed. People expected that their dear ones would return home after the speech made by Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani, but no one turned up, he added.
We want to take everybody along in accordance with the law as we know our limitations, the court said, adding that the Supreme Court was part of the Constitution and not the creator of the Constitution.
When Advocate Hashmat Habib requested the court to summon heads of the Military Intelligence and the Inter-Services Intelligence, Justice Iqbal said that last time when we tried to summon them we were sent home for almost 16 months.
Moving scenes were witnessed in the courtroom when Mrs Amina Masood Janjua, chairperson of the Defence of Human Rights who is campaigning for the release of detained persons including her husband Masood Janjua, regretted that there was silence despite the fact that witnesses were ready to help locate her husband.
The government should be aware of the consequences of missing person cases which is bigger than the NRO (National Reconciliation Ordinance) for it affects every citizen of the country, said Justice Mohammad Sair Ali, a member of the three-judge bench hearing the cases of missing persons.
Even if my son had been picked, I would also be standing outside the court demanding early release of the child, Justice Sair said.
Justice Javed Iqbal, who is heading the bench, deplored that although the government had stated before the court that it would not defend the NRO, an upheaval had been created after the verdict that upset the entire country.
Whenever the Supreme Court is about to take any step, it is told by the government that democracy is in great danger. Democracy does not mean that everybody should be above all limits, Justice Iqbal observed. The basic problem of Balochistan could not be solved unless the issue of missing people was settled, he added.
The court asked Attorney General Anwar Mansoor to contact ministers and secretaries of defence and interior and heads of intelligence agencies to locate missing persons. It decided to hold day-to-day proceedings on the matter after two weeks. The attorney general assured the court that no uncalled for adjournments would be sought by the government in future, but sought eight to 10 weeks time.
He said that about 810 institutions were involved in the issue and he would have to meet them individually because all of them were reluctant to share information at joint meetings.
Justice Iqbal said that action would be taken this time against top officials, instead of merely booking petty officials, adding that it would be an exercise in futility if we start from the bottom by calling officers like inspectors general, section officers or mohrars.
This time we have to start from the top by calling ministers and secretaries and the heads of intelligence agencies, the court said.
Where is the order to pick a person? At least someone must have issued instructions in this regard, Justice Raja Fayyaz said, adding that every institution had some framework and the government should look after the families of missing people.
People have expectations from the Supreme Court which has rendered more sacrifices than others for the cause of democracy, Justice Iqbal observed. People expected that their dear ones would return home after the speech made by Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani, but no one turned up, he added.
We want to take everybody along in accordance with the law as we know our limitations, the court said, adding that the Supreme Court was part of the Constitution and not the creator of the Constitution.
When Advocate Hashmat Habib requested the court to summon heads of the Military Intelligence and the Inter-Services Intelligence, Justice Iqbal said that last time when we tried to summon them we were sent home for almost 16 months.
Moving scenes were witnessed in the courtroom when Mrs Amina Masood Janjua, chairperson of the Defence of Human Rights who is campaigning for the release of detained persons including her husband Masood Janjua, regretted that there was silence despite the fact that witnesses were ready to help locate her husband.