What's new

Mike Pompeo Taps Top Envoy (Zalmay Khalilzad) for Afghan Peace

The Eagle

SENIOR MODERATOR
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
24,239
Reaction score
258
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Mike Pompeo Taps Top Envoy for Afghan Peace
Foreign-policy veteran Zalmay Khalilzad served as ambassador to Afghanistan from 2003-2005 and helped draft Afghan constitution

im-24869

Zalmay Khalilzad, seen in 2016, has been tapped by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to ‘be the State Department’s lead person’ for peace talks in Afghanistan. PHOTO: BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE/GETTY IMAGES

By
Jessica Donati
September 5, 2018



WASHINGTON—Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced the appointment of Zalmay Khalilzad as the top envoy for Afghan peace on Tuesday, tapping a foreign-policy veteran who has been involved in the conflict for decades.

Mr. Pompeo, speaking en route to Pakistan, declined to specify a title for the role, but said Mr. Khalilzad will “be the State Department’s lead person” for peace talks.


Mr. Khalilzad has been involved on the U.S. foreign-policy scene in Afghanistan at virtually every major inflection point since the Soviet invasion during the 1980s, when he served as an adviser to the State Department.

He had a prominent role in the Bush administration during the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, working on the team that helped established a new government during the Bonn Conference that year after the Taliban were ousted from power.

Mr. Khalilzad later also served as ambassador to Afghanistan from 2003-2005 and helped draft the Afghan constitution, which the Taliban want to modify or scrap.

Mr. Pompeo said Mr. Khalilzad will work with John Bass, U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan, and Alice Wells, principal deputy assistant secretary for South and Central Asia.

Ms. Wells has been spearheading a recent U.S. push to engage the Taliban, making repeated trips to meet with the Taliban’s political office in Doha, Qatar, which serves as the group’s embassy.

The discussions were aimed at building trust, according to officials briefed on the meetings, but appeared to have made little progress after the Taliban refused to reciprocate a cease-fire offer by Afghan President Ashraf Ghani last month.

Mr. Khalilzad and Mr. Ghani have known each other since college, when both attended the American University of Beirut at the same time. Mr. Khalilzad also considered running for the president’s job in Afghanistan in recent years, according to people familiar with his political past. He is well-known to the Afghan ruling elite, with many critics and supporters.

Mr. Khalilzad was born in Afghanistan and spent the formative years of his life in the northern city of Mazar-e-Sharif.

Laurel Miller, who served as the top U.S. representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan until June 2017, said the appointment would send a strong signal about the U.S. commitment to negotiating a peace deal.

“Doing something as difficult as negotiating peace doesn’t require an envoy but requires a clearly empowered official with this level of U.S. government backing and serious diplomatic experience,” said Ms. Miller, now a foreign-policy expert at Rand Corp.

Officials in both the Pentagon and State Department are under pressure to show signs of progress, as President Trump has long criticized the Afghan war and expressed a reluctance to keep troops in the country.

Mr. Khalilzad’s nomination for the job had been anticipated for weeks. He didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Mr. Pompeo made the announcement on the way to Pakistan, where he is scheduled to hold meetings with the new government. His arrival follows a U.S. decision to cancel $300 million in military aid to Islamabad.

The U.S. wants Islamabad to do more to fight terrorism and pressure the Taliban to enter into talks, as much of the group’s leadership lives freely in Pakistan.

Critics have questioned Mr. Khalilzad’s suitability for the role over his involvement in Afghan politics and hard-line views toward Pakistan. But supporters say his approach to Islamabad squares with the strong views held by the Trump administration.

Mr. Pompeo noted that the new Pakistani government offers an opportunity for a turnaround.

“We need Pakistan to seriously engage to help us get to the reconciliation we need in Afghanistan,” he said, adding he was hopeful that Pakistan would move to provide assistance fighting terrorism.

—Courtney McBride contributed to this article.
 
. .
That clearly shows that uncle sam does not want peace in Afghanistan.

Poor decision. How can a hawk lead peace talks?
It is not a rocket science...simply because USA does not want peace in Afghanistan. USA does not want to leave Afghanistan. It has to control China, Pakistan, Russia and Iran from here. USA did not come to Afghanistan with an intention to leave...It was planned long before 9/11 and rather 9/11 attacks were arranged to create the excuse for this incursion. A lot of resources and years of planning went into this. If anyone still think US will leave any time soon..on her own, he or she is a citizen of the fool's paradise.
 
. .
Khalilzad served as a State Department policy planner during the Reagan administration and argued that the United States should arm Afghan mujahideen fighters in their war against Soviet forces in the 1980s. After the Soviet Union withdrew, the mujahideen turned on each other, the country descended into civil war and the Taliban rose to power.


https://www.npr.org/
 
.
Simply bizarre and highly stupid thing to have this guy coming back. Into politics and negotiations now

Americans are now expecting Pakistan to work with a guy who is just anti Pakistani a pathological hater lol. Either they are trolling Pakistan or they have simply gone mad with failure
 
. .
Simply bizarre and highly stupid thing to have this guy coming back. Into politics and negotiations now

Americans are now expecting Pakistan to work with a guy who is just anti Pakistani a pathological hater lol. Either they are trolling Pakistan or they have simply gone mad with failure

Pak doesn't have to nor will work with him. He's not like Holbrooke. "Af-Pak" is not his brief.

That clearly shows that uncle sam does not want peace in Afghanistan.


It is not a rocket science...simply because USA does not want peace in Afghanistan. USA does not want to leave Afghanistan. It has to control China, Pakistan, Russia and Iran from here. USA did not come to Afghanistan with an intention to leave...It was planned long before 9/11 and rather 9/11 attacks were arranged to create the excuse for this incursion. A lot of resources and years of planning went into this. If anyone still think US will leave any time soon..on her own, he or she is a citizen of the fool's paradise.

That brings us to what Pak should be doing, not what it has been doing. I've been saying this from the beginning, a stable afg is NOT in Pak's interest. Never has been, never will be. Quit repeating nonsensical terms of trying to bring stability and reconciliation in afg. There is no brotherhood. No open border. A stable afg can only be a bigger headache than an occupied and failed afg already is. Pak's interests do lie in pushing the instability back across the border and having afghans kill themselves and the occupiers till they fall apart and are faced with dismemberment and partition. Isolating and quarantining afg is the only solution going forward. Pak's interests also don't lie in trying to get what Pak perceives to be pro-Pak forces into power. It may happen but no need to actively play a part, just let it happen. Engage with all, favor none.
 
Last edited:
.
He is the architect of "do more" mofo. This mofo will be like that Iraqi in exile who pushed for war against his homeland and look at Iraq today its in ruins.

People have guessed right, there is no peace on the road map.

Bringing this idiot who ruined things in the first place shows how non serious they are. They don't want peace.
 
.
Pak doesn't have to nor will work with him. He's not like Holbrooke. "Af-Pak" is not his brief.



That brings us to what Pak should be doing, not what it has been doing. I've been saying this from the beginning, a stable afg is NOT in Pak's interest. Never has been, never will be. Quit repeated nonsensical terms of trying to bring stability and reconciliation in afg. There is no brotherhood. No open border. A stable afg can only be a bigger headache than an occupied and failed afg already is. Pak's interests do lie in pushing the instability back across the border and having afghans kill themselves and the occupiers till they fall apart and are faced with dismemberment and partition. Isolating and quarantining afg is the only solution going forward. Pak's interests also don't lie in trying to get what Pak perceives to be pro-Pak forces into power. It may happen but no need to actively play a part, just let it happen. Engage with all, favor none.

Your post should be read by all the Pakistani liberals. And the brotherhood brigade.
 
.
Your post should be read by all the Pakistani liberals. And the brotherhood brigade.

Still of the opinion that the self-styled liberals are more of a detriment to Pak than the brotherhood brigade. They're both reactionaries that feed off the insanity of each other, and the masses are stuck in between these bozos. Both lack critical thinking and nuance in formulating and presenting their opinion. Both play to their own gallery. Massive circle-jerk all around.
 
.
Still of the opinion that the self-styled liberals are more of a detriment to Pak than the brotherhood brigade. They're both reactionaries that feed off the insanity of each other, and the masses are stuck in between these bozos. Both lack critical thinking and nuance in formulating and presenting their opinion. Both play to their own gallery. Massive circle-jerk all around.

Im very surprised your replies here haven’t generated even more thumbs up. Top rated replies thanks.

Salam Qamar
 
. . .

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom