What's new

Microfinance guru Muhammad Yunus faces removal from Grameen Bank

CaPtAiN_pLaNeT

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
7,685
Reaction score
0
Microfinance guru Muhammad Yunus faces removal from Grameen Bank

Pressure on Nobel prizewinner to quit bank board but supporters say campaign is politically motivated by Bangladesh government


Microfinance guru Muhammad Yunus faces removal from Grameen Bank | World news | The Guardian

* guardian.co.uk, Monday 21 February 2011 15.45 GMT
* Article history

muhammad yunus Muhammad Yunus, 70, who founded Grameen Bank to give micro loans to poor people in Bangladesh, is facing calls to relinquish his position as managing director. Photograph: Boris Horvat/AFP/Getty Images

Muhammad Yunus, the Nobel prizewinning economist and so-called father of microfinance, faces being ousted from the bank that he founded to help poor people in Bangladesh and across the developing world.

Yunus, the managing director of the Grameen Bank, which has lent small sums to millions of deprived people to help them start or run their own businesses as a first step out of poverty since being created in 1983, has been caught in a bitter political battle in his homeland of Bangladesh.

The campaign to remove Yunus, mounted mainly by politicians, is to intensify this week ahead of a key board meeting next Monday, which his supporters believe will involve an attempt to force the 70-year-old to quit as managing director.

Last week, Bangladesh's finance minister said Yunus should stand down following alleged irregularities in operations.

Abul Maal Abdul Muhith called Yunus a "man of high standing and respect" but "now old". The minister, who is 77, said: "We need to redefine the bank's role and bring it under closer regulation."

Supporters of Yunus fear politicians want to bring Grameen under government control. Yunus did not respond directly to the minister's comments but told reporters: "Any transition [would] essentially require a friendly environment and support from the inside and outside stakeholders of the bank to ensure that we continue to be totally committed to our mission for and with the poor."

Other government comments have been less polite. In December, the prime minister, Sheikh Hasina, accused Yunus of treating Grameen as his personal property and claimed the group was "sucking blood from the poor".

Supporters have branded the claim as grotesque, especially as Yunus has won a Nobel prize for his work on reducing poverty.

He has appeared in a Dhaka court to face charges that one of his social business ventures resulted in the sale of contaminated yoghurt.

He has also had to answer claims made in a Norwegian television documentary last year that Grameen transferred funds from Norway's aid agency in the 1990s from one legal entity to another for tax purposes. The Norwegian government said an inquiry had found no evidence of wrongdoing.

The attacks on Yunus come at a time when microlending – once hailed as a model that would change the lives of hundreds of millions in the developing roads – faces increasing political hostility.

In India, politicians have accused bankers of profiteering from the poor and, in some places, banned further lending or recovery of debts.

In the southern Indian state of Andhra Pradesh, aggressive selling by scores of unregulated microfinance firms has pushed huge numbers of already desperately poor farmers deeply into debt. Some analysts have spoken of the industry as south Asia's equivalent of American's subprime loans, with equal potential to cause financial havoc.

Friends and admirers of Yunus believe politicians have been looking for an opportunity to oust him since the economist tried to establish a political party several years ago to fight corruption, an endemic problem in Bangladesh.

Another motive may be the electoral advantages in controlling the bank itself, in which the government has a 10% stake, and the resources and popularity it might bring.

The bank helps about 8m of Bangladesh's poorest families and, through social business partnerships with global brands such as Adidas and Danone, has secured employment for more than 30,000 people.

An international campaign to defend Yunus has been launched. The high-powered Friends of Grameen, chaired by Mary Robinson, the former United Nations high commissioner for human rights and one-time president of Ireland, condemned "the campaign of misinformation" against Yunus in a statement last week. It said the "increasingly aggressive attacks" on Yunus were "politically orchestrated".

Other members include James Wolfensohn, the former World Bank president, Yeardley Smith, the French-born American actor, and Liam Black, a UK-based social entrepreneur.

"It is vital that Grameen Bank remains an independent financial resource for the poor of rural Bangladesh," Black said. "The bullying and insulting of Yunus as a 'blood sucker' and the pathetic attempts by the government to remove him on grounds of his age must stop."
How Grameen Bank was formed

The idea of microfinance came to Muhammad Yunus when, as a young economics professor during a famine in Bangladesh in the late 1970s, he came across rural women skilled in local handicrafts who owed so much to local moneylenders that they earned only pennies each day from hours of labour.

Yunus created a bank that would lend small sums to such clients, filling the gap that traditional banks had left and cutting out local loan sharks. The model of small sums lent mainly to women, often organised into mutually supporting groups, was extremely successful, with very few loans left un-repaid and a wide range of social benefits.

The bank rapidly had millions of clients. The model of Grameen Bank – Grameen means rural or grassroots in the Bengali language – has been exported over much of the developing world. In recent years however newcomers to the business have made significant profits from microfinance. Some have been accused of exploiting the poor through aggressive selling techniques, high interest rates and aggressive collection of loan repayments.
 
.
I don't believe that Muhammad Yunus is the angel that the West portrays.

1) His Grameen Bank charges an interest which comes to around 25-30%. How many businesses are there which give returns of 30%? And the profits must be much greater than 30%, if the borrower is to have anything left after working. Can an illiterate woman in a village make a business that gives returns of >30% per year?

In its case studies, GB shows examples of women who become successful, through a loan. Say, they buy a goat with the money, sell the milk and send their children to school. Its OK, very good. But what happens when all her neighbours also start buying goats and selling milk? The price of milk will collapse, and nobody will be able to pay back their loans. Its not as if there are thousands of industries that poor illiterate women can start on their own. Livestock, agriculture, and some variant of shop-keeping is about it.

2) I believe that he is over-hyped by the West, because it has swallowed his Politically-Correct mantra of "women empowerment", "women better than men", etc. Remember, he only lends to women. He says that it is because "women are more reliable", but I don't believe this. I think he only lends to women because they are i) easy to intimidate into paying back loans ii) easy to fool into taking loans by a sweet-talking representative iii) it helps his image abroad with the West, which believes that Islam oppresses women, so "empowering women", so that maybe one day they will "liberate" themselves from Islam. Of course, it will not happen, but they want it to.

3) Grameen Bank was established through a special ordinance, in the time of Ershad, IIRC. Why should Yunus's bank be treated differently from the rest? Why should GB be above the law? This is a matter of corruption.

If there is any supporter of microcredit, I'd be happy to listen to his/her point of veiw, especially if from BD.
 
.
I don't believe that Muhammad Yunus is the angel that the West portrays.

1) His Grameen Bank charges an interest which comes to around 25-30%. How many businesses are there which give returns of 30%? And the profits must be much greater than 30%, if the borrower is to have anything left after working. Can an illiterate woman in a village make a business that gives returns of >30% per year?

In its case studies, GB shows examples of women who become successful, through a loan. Say, they buy a goat with the money, sell the milk and send their children to school. Its OK, very good. But what happens when all her neighbours also start buying goats and selling milk? The price of milk will collapse, and nobody will be able to pay back their loans. Its not as if there are thousands of industries that poor illiterate women can start on their own. Livestock, agriculture, and some variant of shop-keeping is about it.

This can averted using community based approach, where a large community of people buy goats and sell milk or milk based products to corporates for distributing them to consumers. As a reference, please check Amul project in Gujrat, India.

2) I believe that he is over-hyped by the West, because it has swallowed his Politically-Correct mantra of "women empowerment", "women better than men", etc. Remember, he only lends to women. He says that it is because "women are more reliable", but I don't believe this. I think he only lends to women because they are i) easy to intimidate into paying back loans ii) easy to fool into taking loans by a sweet-talking representative iii) it helps his image abroad with the West, which believes that Islam oppresses women, so "empowering women", so that maybe one day they will "liberate" themselves from Islam. Of course, it will not happen, but they want it to.

The idea behind it is, if women start earning their own bread, they won't be dependant on diktats of men anymore. And do you really believe women are easy to fool or easy to intimidate into paying back loans? :confused:

[/QUOTE]
 
.
Women are more emotional than men, and it is easier to convince them through use of emotional arguments. There is no black and white, and lots of men are emotional, and lots of women are logical, but ON THE WHOLE women are more emotional and thus, easier to fool than men. Even though its non-PC to admit it, and I don't want to go into a long argument about it, but yes, I believe that on the whole you will find that women are more emotional and men are more rational.

The idea is that women start owning their own bread, that they will not depend on men.

Let us examine this idea in detail: Women are the primary breadwinners, and men are to do what? Sit and drink alcohol with their friends all day at the bar? The type of family you are advocating is a very fashionable in the West, but it is pure suicide for any society. Just look at the African American societies in the USA. There, women have all the power. They sleep with whatever man they want to, they throw out their boyfriends if they don't like them (ie, their BF), they are very "empowered", and "independet". As a result the Black family is among the most backward in the USA. Let me give you a quote from an American Senator, Daniel Patrick Moynihan

From the wild Irish slums of the 19th century Eastern seaboard, to the riot-torn suburbs of Los Angeles, there is one unmistakable lesson in American history; a community that allows a large number of men to grow up in broken families, dominated by women, never acquiring any stable relationship to male authority, never acquiring any set of rational expectations about the future -- that community asks for and gets chaos. Crime, violence, unrest, disorder -- most particularly the furious, unrestrained lashing out at the whole social structure -- that is not only to be expected; it is very near to inevitable. And it is richly deserved.

The Negro Family: The Case for National Action (1965)

What the GB are advocating are some variant of this. Women shall be the primary breadwinners, they shall be "independent" of men. And of course, young men will grow up without any prospects for the future. What they are advocating is "NATIONAL SUICIDE". Stable, two-parent families MUST be the basic building blocks of any stable, prosperous nation.

I advise you to read a few books written by Daniel Amneus. Its always better to read a variety of opinions on any topic, and his arguments are very rational.
 
.
Go and read the comments on Tim Heinemann's blog. By the way, I wrote this post before reading the comments, but I'm really surprised to see that all those comments are almost word-for-word the same arguments as mine.
New Film: “Caught in Micro debt”
Do some more research on that film and microcredit. As I said, its always to read a wide variety of opinions instead of relying on one source.

I'd like to point out the following comments:
Rahima Siddique
December 1, 2010 at 22:10

All those big words like micro credit, micro finance etc. have nothing to do with women empowerment. Grameen Banks is simply sucking out the last drop of blood from the poor people of Bangladesh. Stand up people. Stop the MOHAJON.

Barik
December 2, 2010 at 05:14

The people of Bangladesh will not wake up. They are just ignorant and sentimental. Their streets will be flooded with Voters. Yes, Voters Only. They Just Vote and cry out for their National Achievements! “We Own Nobel”. These Asians are always hungry to be positively labeled by white people from The West. If the recognition comes from West, Ooh yes, we are on top of the World as Westerners have evaluated us as Successful.

They Need Recognition from West. Md Yunus is nothing but a bitter fruit nurtured and publicized by the Developed Countries.

Is there any interview of the Good Friend of Mr. Younus, Hilary Rodham Clinton in the Documentary regarding this?

Or she is also unreachable! Is it possible to include an interview of Mr. Clinton in the international Version of the Documentary?

I think, in the scam not only the Nobel Laureate is involved but also many other white from rich donor countries are engaged.

habib1974
December 2, 2010 at 13:27

we know that Dr younus is a fraud. because-by investigative repot any holder of microcredit will not prosper. They are loser day by day. In Bangladesh poverty is a problem. Not only Gramin Bank- In Bangladesh Any NGO- Their main Terget Earn of Money (in any cause-like Microcredit, change of life style, for education, womens right developmen, for por women, for child labour). I am a journalist-I think All NGO are Fraud in Bangladesh. I know That (have document) when The donor give money for Bangladeshi (any reason) The NGO’s Terget without any work earn The money. Not only That- In any Project (who needs some of employer) employers they cannot give the approve salary. The NGOs Vacancy Advertise in News paper. although The employers & with NGOs Has a condition- The NGOs will not give the actual salary.
I think If any donor want to help Bangladesh- They should sudden visit about project.
One Example- Many Of Donor Donet For Adibasi (minoroties-development). but no development Their. I Think Many Donor Donet minimum 1000 bilion dollar for them. but no development. because NGOs are not real.
so stop the microcredit. investigation about your donet. please do this. & please punished Mr dr younus.
 
.
I don't believe that Muhammad Yunus is the angel that the West portrays.

1) His Grameen Bank charges an interest which comes to around 25-30%. How many businesses are there which give returns of 30%? And the profits must be much greater than 30%, if the borrower is to have anything left after working. Can an illiterate woman in a village make a business that gives returns of >30% per year?

In its case studies, GB shows examples of women who become successful, through a loan. Say, they buy a goat with the money, sell the milk and send their children to school. Its OK, very good. But what happens when all her neighbours also start buying goats and selling milk? The price of milk will collapse, and nobody will be able to pay back their loans. Its not as if there are thousands of industries that poor illiterate women can start on their own. Livestock, agriculture, and some variant of shop-keeping is about it.

2) I believe that he is over-hyped by the West, because it has swallowed his Politically-Correct mantra of "women empowerment", "women better than men", etc. Remember, he only lends to women. He says that it is because "women are more reliable", but I don't believe this. I think he only lends to women because they are i) easy to intimidate into paying back loans ii) easy to fool into taking loans by a sweet-talking representative iii) it helps his image abroad with the West, which believes that Islam oppresses women, so "empowering women", so that maybe one day they will "liberate" themselves from Islam. Of course, it will not happen, but they want it to.

3) Grameen Bank was established through a special ordinance, in the time of Ershad, IIRC. Why should Yunus's bank be treated differently from the rest? Why should GB be above the law? This is a matter of corruption.

If there is any supporter of microcredit, I'd be happy to listen to his/her point of veiw, especially if from BD.

There is no such thing as free lunch. I have read all the pros and cons. There is no sure way to remove poverty but grameen tries something which the so called govt does not do. It gives the poor people a chance. By giving them a chance, it is their own duty to take advantage and use it resourcefully. I am really sorry, but this is how capitalism works.
 
.
The cost of borrowing for microcredit institutions is high. Also they have higher administrative expenses. Yunus said(Which is considered true, but you can argue) any rate which is 15 percentage points more than the prevalent interest rate of banks is wrong for microcredit institutions. Which means, if normal banks give loan at 10 percent interest rate, microcredit institution should give loan at less than 25 percent.
I am sure grameen does that.
And Yunus always said he is a banker, and grameen bank is for profit, not for free lunch.
The difference is at least grameen bank( or other microfinance insti) are giving loans, other banks simply ignore those people. So those people would have to go to money lender who would have charged 100 percent( yes, unbelievable but true).
But your point is right, you cannot make a country rich by giving microcredit( or even giving aids).
 
.
I accept that microcredit is capitalism. But in that case, we should stop believing that it is a magic bullet for poverty reduction.
 
.
Its not big buzz about wither micro finance have brought fortune for poor peoples but the winning of prestigious nobel prize
by a Bangladeshi is the important things for us. he has brighten the image of Bangladesh by winning Nobel price.Now why he is in trouble is mainly that once he wanted to join politics and criticize polician .
 
.
That is a big problem with us Bangladeshis! Why do we have to depend on Western prizes for us to have a positive image? Look at China, look at Iran. They have a positive image through hard work and having built their own industries. They don't depend on what the Westerners say to have self-confidence. Iran just sent up a satellite, and it has the highest scientific growth rate. China, I don't need to say anything about them. Why are we such weaklings? Why do we have to depend on the West's congratulations to feel happy about ourselves? Why do we let foreigners dictate our policies? Why don't we take care of our country by ourselves?
Why do we place such a high price on what the West thinks of us? I personally don't give a damn as to what the West thinks of us or any particular BDeshi. In fact, if the West praises a certain BDeshi, I am suspicious of him and don't like him (or more often, her).
 
.
In the views of Karl Marx.
"For any revolution to be successful.. its leaders must die.."

In this case.. removed..
Most successful companies..
had their founders swept out by the board .
In this case.. It seems Mr Yunus is a liability the AL govt does not want.
 
.
Let us examine this idea in detail: Women are the primary breadwinners, and men are to do what? Sit and drink alcohol with their friends all day at the bar? The type of family you are advocating is a very fashionable in the West, but it is pure suicide for any society. Just look at the African American societies in the USA. There, women have all the power. They sleep with whatever man they want to, they throw out their boyfriends if they don't like them (ie, their BF), they are very "empowered", and "independet". As a result the Black family is among the most backward in the USA. Let me give you a quote from an American Senator, Daniel Patrick Moynihan

From the wild Irish slums of the 19th century Eastern seaboard, to the riot-torn suburbs of Los Angeles, there is one unmistakable lesson in American history; a community that allows a large number of men to grow up in broken families, dominated by women, never acquiring any stable relationship to male authority, never acquiring any set of rational expectations about the future -- that community asks for and gets chaos. Crime, violence, unrest, disorder -- most particularly the furious, unrestrained lashing out at the whole social structure -- that is not only to be expected; it is very near to inevitable. And it is richly deserved.

The Negro Family: The Case for National Action (1965)

Oh come on, need I even post a retort of this misogynist, sexist post? :/

And stop quoting racists as a point of reference.
 
.
You believe whatever you want to, and I'll stick to my own observations, thank you.

I personally believe that the real racists are those who oppose any effort to reform the culture of backward societies (and this includes many Muslim societies), and instead blame everything on white racism/external factors.
 
.
India's ex-judge, Grameen supporters rally behind Yunus

India's ex-judge, Grameen supporters rally behind Yunus

2011-02-24 13:00:00

Dhaka, Feb 24 (IANS) Former chief justice of India J.S. Verma has condemned the vilification campaign against Grameen micro credit pioneer and Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, while a group of prominent world citizens has lent its voice to the protests.

Verma Wednesday took exception to Muzammel Huq, Grameen Bank's newly appointed chairman, calling Yunus a 'chicken-hearted man'.

This was an 'unacceptable' insult on its founder, Verma said.

'In contrast with the chairman's shocking and acrimonious public remarks against Yunus, we were quite relieved seeing government officials showing respect and appreciation for Yunus and the Grameen Bank,' said Verma, a member of a group called 'Friends of Grameen.'

Kerry Kennedy, a human rights activist and niece of the late US president John F. Kennedy, has joined Friends of Grameen. She will be one of the vice presidents of the group's executive committee, said a statement of the group.

Michel Camdessus, former managing director of International Monetary Fund, also joined the committee chaired by Mary Robinson, a former president of Ireland.

'I have decided to join the initiative because I have been a long-time admirer of Yunus and his lifetime devotion to the cause of the poor,' Camdessus said.

'The impact they had, building alternative poverty alleviation programmes in Bangladesh and abroad is beyond imagination. Protecting this living heritage is a priority for all those interested in economic and social development.'

Floated Feb 11, the forum also aims to promote microcredit and social business.

Members of the voluntary association include about 50 charities and public figures, including James Wolfensohn, former president of World Bank, and Yeardley Smith, a French-born American actress. It has vowed to protect Yunus from 'politically orchestrated' insults.

The government and Yunus's opponents are increasingly mounting pressure on the Nobel laureate after a Norwegian television channel aired a documentary last December accusing him and Grameen Bank of malpractice in handling funds.

The bank, however, denied the charges, saying the issue had been settled over a decade ago between the bank and the Norwegian government, one of its main donors.

Yunus shared a Nobel Peace Prize with Grameen Bank in 2006.

Thirteen eminent Bangladeshis have also protested at Yunus being 'harassed in various ways'.

'Nobel laureate Dr Yunus has brought glory for Bangladesh and we want decency while writing and speaking about him,' they added.
 
.
Who is this Lonelyone, the lonely backstabber...

Definitely we will always give backing to the people who enlightens our Image. Definitely we will support Dr. Yunus. Absolutely disgraceful act by the govt against the only bangladeshi Nobel literate.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom