What's new

MFN status to India to turn Pakistan into consumer market

A.Rafay

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Apr 25, 2012
Messages
11,400
Reaction score
10
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
LAHORE - Relations between India and Pakistan could not be improved until the Kashmir and water issues were resolved.
“Though Pakistani entrepreneurs are ready to compete with Indian products and look forward to gaining access to a very large Indian market but the government would have to ensure that a level playing field be provided as presently there are significant differences between two countries in terms of cost of doing business, bank lending rates etc.,” observed All Pakistan Anjuman-e-Tajiran central chairman Khawaja Shafiq.
Talking to The Nation, the noted trade leader, who has recently launched a political party of “Tajir Awam Movement” from his native city of Multan, opposed the Most Favoured Nation status to India, saying it will be detrimental to the Kashmir cause, besides turning Pakistan into a consumer market.
He said that the survival of the industry in Pakistan is at stake due to multiple reasons. Besides energy issues, availability of cheap smuggled goods is a grave threat.
“We need to tackle this problem at various ends including reduction in custom duties, tightening the surveillance on borders and enforcement of custom law and regulations at the entry points.”
Khawaja Shafiq said that the biggest problem faced by the business community, and generally the whole of Pakistan, is a severe shortage of energy.
He said that the problem of circular debt must also be tackled on sustainable basis.
He said that Pakistan has immense potential to produce cheap and reliable electricity through coal and proposed that sizeable funds be allocated for the development of Thar Coal project. He proposed that a handsome amount be allocated for construction of an LNG terminal at the port city of Karachi.
He also urged the government to address the law and order situation in Karachi especially, as law and order is a major cause for the decline in local and foreign investment in Pakistan. The APAT chairman also called for cut in non-developmental expenditures as adopting stricter financial discipline can decrease this deficit
The chairman urged the government to allocate Rs200 billion per year or 10 per cent of the total budget at the very least for hydel energy projects in order to produce cheap energy. He said that the Kalabagh dam is the most viable project to address the energy issue, but has unfortunately fallen prey to politics. He urged the government to ensure equal supply of electricity throughout the country as the province of Punjab is the worst hit by the electricity shortage and only last year it lost three per cent of its GDP due to power crisis.
He said the small and medium cottage industry was engine of the growth and in the developed countries it was facilitated to the maximum but in Pakistan circumstances were quite the other way round.
He said consumers of the efficient distribution companies with lowest line losses and the highest recovery ratio were being treated unfairly.
He said Punjab contributed nearly two thirds to the GDP of Pakistan, adding Punjab paid for 80 per cent of electricity bills and got only 60 per cent of electricity units, yet Punjab was being made the worst victim of injustice.

MFN status to India to turn Pakistan into consumer market | The Nation
 
I think the Market is not fair right now

a) Local Markets lack energy , power and support

While companies in India do have power so that is an unfair advantage

While I feel that MFN status to india is good thing but it has to be done when local industry is provided 100% electricity and power so local industry has ample room to compete èqually with Indian industries

Otherwise we will turn into zombie state , that has no production we only get stuff and buy stuff with no creating power of our own

The issue of water and Kashmir are very important and should be discussed

MFN should be considered no doubt at some stage but only after Government of Pakistan gives Local companies Electricity for 2 years so they can be productive as in 60`s and 70`s
 
Pakistan should not waste time. Give it to India as soon as possible.
 
I think the Market is not fair right now

a) Local Markets lack energy , power and support

While companies in India do have power so that is an unfair advantage

How come this is an unfair advantage? This is an advantage but not unfair. India is not responsible for Pakistan's inability to utilize its own coal for generating electricity.

This argument is like US has unfair advantage because they have a better tech. Is this sounds reasonable?

While I feel that MFN status to india is good thing but it has to be done when local industry is provided 100% electricity and power so local industry has ample room to compete èqually with Indian industries

Otherwise we will turn into zombie state , that has no production we only get stuff and buy stuff with no creating power of our own

You already have a free trade agreement with China.

The issue of water and Kashmir are very important and should be discussed

Correct.

MFN should be considered no doubt at some stage but only after Government of Pakistan gives Local companies Electricity for 2 years so they can be productive as in 60`s and 70`s

I think India should revoke MFN status given to pakistan :P
 
Pakistan right now needs good economy along with security. Its better to increase trade with India to boost your growth.
 
Pakistan right now needs good economy along with security. Its better to increase trade with India to boost your growth.




Yar trade ka maza tou tub ayega jub aap bhi hum say kuch khreedain gay.:D
 
Pakistan should also open transit route to Afghanistan. They can earn transit money from the trade between India and Afghanistan..
 
What Pakistan needs right now is to keep Kashmir issue away for a while and think about real business. India's population is a lucrative market which,even after having so many differences on border issues and a bloody war attracts the chinese towards India. Because they shelved their ego and care for business and making money.They are much cleverer than both India and Pakistan.

On the other hand policies should be made so that Indian companies,which clearly have an edge over its Pakistani counterparts right now must not swallow your local markets (which is a problem in India. The cheap chinese goods are a threat to local Indian manufacturers).A good and simple "give and take"policy will lead us to a better political situation in future.
 
With trade Indians mean imports from India at the cost of local industry.

Indian industry have unfair advantage over local industry.

Local produce is heavily taxed, while Indian imports are heavily subsidized by Pakistan govt.
 
We cant compete with Indian industry due to economy of scale.

Even if we dont factor in this advantage that India has, we have left our business men with no support in terms of dwindling power supplies, high cost of doing business and total lack of law and order in the biggest city of the country. So I think in this scenario, Pakistan will be bigger loser.

I as a Pakistani dont want to see Pakistan as a consumer economy. It should be a productive economy first. But for that, government need policies, a vision and seriousness which it chronically lacks.
 
well everything in that article sounds like a typical protectionist agenda. anyways, some of the concerns i read elsewhere are valid. india is providing subsidy to some of its sub sectors thus giving them an unfair advantage. Its not a game of morals that we should debate the nature of what is fair and what is not. Pakistan should be careful in opening those sectors in which such is the case. the electricity argument is convincing but im still not sure if delaying MFN will be of any benefit.
 
well everything in that article sounds like a typical protectionist agenda. anyways, some of the concerns i read elsewhere are valid. india is providing subsidy to some of its sub sectors thus giving them an unfair advantage. Its not a game of morals that we should debate the nature of what is fair and what is not. Pakistan should be careful in opening those sectors in which such is the case. the electricity argument is convincing but im still not sure if delaying MFN will be of any benefit.

Of course. Pakistan's domestic markets have long been carved up by mini-monopolies in collusion with those create government policies. The consumers lose out with poor quality goods and services at high prices, but it does give ensured profits to those in control. Why would these entrenched cartels not try to defend the status quo?
 
Pakistani government just need to fully concentrate on keeping or producing a healthy growth rate for atleast a decade .
The possibilities of development in a market such as Pakistan is endless.
You have the land , the well built road , a vibrant society etc
The negatives are massive power cuts , unemployment and low income so low consumption and hence less amount of tax money paid to the government .
Better plan and look for the negatives and reverse them as quickly as possible .
Follow the Indian way , assan rahega .
 
Back
Top Bottom