What's new

meet major general nigar khan

lately I have been coming across many Pakistani women married to indians and are about to get married, this gets me worried.Reminds me of "Andar ghus kay maarna"

love trumps hate.....................

she is from sawabi from military back ground family




64391535_2337263779650693_5827191149361627136_n.jpg

She has been a Maj. General since Feb 2017. Anyways i don't know her but she is from my family city Swabi.
 
.
But asking for them to be corp commanders just for your version of ' modern ' is absurd and shows a lack of real world understanding

This absurdity at the core of a lot of wrong things with our society today. A certain part of our society, instead of picking up the scientific culture and ethics from West, has managed to get inspired by the crazy feminazis. That crazy Aurat March is one such example.

I am all for women rights. But there are defined roles for both women and men in our culture and religion. Lets not forget that.
 
. .
She served under/with my father for 3 years when she was a brigadier posted at CMH Jhelum. I’ve known her personally ever since. She’s a family friend and a great and respectable person and officer. It’s nice to see that there’s no discrimination. She could sit among male officers, senior and junior. In the same way that they did among themselves. She also had a commanding presence as an officer should. Hence she reached this stage. More power to her.
 
.
No no don't want any symbolic representation.. Infact there are many army chiefs who are women in many countries and head of intellegence are women too sometimes . Surely our system is different .
But we should develop our military on the lines so as not equally but some form representation.
Not the stuff in parliament where reserve seats are for only women who are only there to praise their masters


Dude, you need to fix your understanding of those many countries, because you are surely lacking on it.
And tell me, what do you want here? Women to be part of the squads posted on the border and having to live with men with limited resources and limited privacy? Bathe in the same place?
Become active combatants and get captured by the enemy or worse?

We are a nation of Muslims, we honor and respect women, and elevate them. We don't pull them down to the level of an object or by equating them with men. Their status is far more sacred and precious than to be equated with men.
 
.
Why don't we have women in our core commanders group.
Army is the most modern institution . They must also include women in the top brass.

Under Islamic ruling and law! Woman are not allowed to lead men to war or govern them. That’s sharia law
 
. . . .
Men, will still need to follow her and obey her instructions when given to them!

Aisay to phir har institution main female officers even district police officers of a few districts are women
 
.
Aisay to phir har institution main female officers even district police officers of a few districts are women

We don’t believe in Phir or Darbas I think are called. Going off track now. No idea of benefits there

Police ladies and teachers doing there civil duties. Hopefully helping fellow gender as them beefing help. Don’t mix cultural with Islam.
 
. .
Brother kindly read this



Praise be to Allaah.

Positions of leadership and high public office means taking on the mission of establishing Islam by reviving religious knowledge and establishing its foundations, engaging in jihaad for the sake of Allaah – which includes preparing armies and distributing war booty – establishing the judicial system, carrying out judicial punishments (hudood), fighting oppression, enjoining what is good and forbidding what is evil, acting as a deputy of the Prophet SAWS (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him).

There is no dispute among the scholars that one of the conditions of the imaam or leader is that he should be male. Ibn Hazam reported in his book Maraatib al-Ijmaa’ that there was scholarly consensus on this point. In the section he says: “Out of all groups of the people of the Qiblah [i.e., all Muslim sects], there is not one that allows the leadership of women.” Al-Qurtubi reported something similar, and al-‘Allaamah al-Shanqeeti said, “There is no difference of opinion among the scholars on this point.”

The evidence for this is the general meaning of the aayah (interpretation of the meaning): “Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allaah has made one of them to excel the other…” [al-Nisa’ 4:34]. It is also clearly indicated by the hadeeth of Abu Bakrah who said that when the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) heard that the Persians had appointed the daughter of Chosroes as their queen, he said, “No people who appoint a woman as their leader will ever prosper.” (Reported by al-Bukhaari, 13/53).

This is because positions of leadership and government require a person to join men’s gatherings, which is not allowed for women according to sharee’ah because of the aayah (interpretation of the meaning): “And stay in your houses, and do not display yourselves like that of the times of ignorance…” [al-Ahzaab 33:33]. These positions also require perfect wisdom, reason and alertness, and the testimony of a man has been made equal to that of two women, the reason for which Allaah has explained in the aayah (interpretation of the meaning): “… so that if one of them (two women) errs, the other can remind her…” [al-Baqarah 2:282].

Imaam al-Muwaffaq Ibn Qudaamah said:

“For this reason the Prophet SAWS (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and his successors (khulafa’) and those who came after them never appointed a woman to be a judge or a governor of a province, as far as we know. If it were permissible, it should have happened.”

Imaam al-Ghazaali said:

“The position of leader (imaam) could never be given to a woman even if she possessed all the qualities of perfection and self-reliance. How could a woman take the position of leader when she did not have the right to be a judge or a witness under most of the historical governments?”

Imaam al-Baghawi said:

“The scholars agreed that women are not fit to be leaders or judges, because the leader needs to go out to organize jihaad and take care of the Muslims’ affairs, and the judge needs to go out to judge between people, but women are ‘awrah and it is not right for them to go out. Because of their weakness, women are not able to do many things. Women are imperfect, and the positions of leaders and judge are among the most perfect of positions for which only the most perfect of men are qualified.”

Undoubtedly this is proven by reality. People know from experience that only men are fit for leadership, because women by nature are more emotional and more easily swayed by their feelings and compassion. These qualities have been created in women to enable them to carry out their most important duty, which is that of motherhood and nurturing children. Men, on the other hand, are not usually swayed by their emotions as women are. Their way is usually one of logic and deliberation, which form the essence of responsibility and leadership.

With regard to the question of whether a woman may be appointed as a judge, the majority of Maaliki, Shaafa’i and Hanbali scholars say that a woman cannot be appointed as a judge, because of the general meaning of the hadeeth of Abu Bakrah quoted above.

Al-Haafiz ibn Hajar said:

“Ibn al-Teen said: Those who say that a woman cannot be appointed as a judge use the hadeeth of Abu Bakrah as evidence, and this is the view of the majority.”

With regard to other administrative positions, there is no shar’i reason why women should not be appointed to run institutions where they will work with other women and not men, because in this case there are no shar’i reservations about their work.

There is no validity in what most modern writers say about how women have to go out and take part in parliaments and public councils, and that these are part of the rights granted to women by Islam. These writers have not examined the issue from the correct Islamic viewpoint. The truth is clear, but unfortunately they look at it with minds filled with the heretic trends of East and West. Therefore you see them weakened and defeated, dazzled by the false civilizations of those nations, then they come and misinterpret the texts and change the words from their right places until they agree with their whims. We ask Allaah to keep us safe and sound.

Show on Islam Q&A website.
 
.
Under Islamic ruling and law! Woman are not allowed to lead men to war or govern them. That’s sharia law

What is this book of Sharia law? Where are these laws stated, recorded? Could you please provide me a singular, difinitive work on all the laws that make up "Sharia Law"?

Anyway, Hazrat Aisha (R) led an army of muslims. No one objected that she couldn't, not even the Muslims in opposition. The Prophet (S.A.W) sought and followed Hazrat Umme Salma's (R) advice on the Treaty of Hudaibia. Hazrat Omar was argued against one of his rulings by a woman he had appointed to keep Madina's market in check, he withdrew. After Hazrat Umar's shahadat, the committee selected by him for electing the next Khalifa consulted women on the matter as well. Then read up on Khawlah bint al-Azwar and her leadership during different battles under the command of Khalid bin Walid in the time of Hazrat Omar.

Please stop following these "insecure about their masculinity" mullahs who can only feel better about their insignificant and impotent selves by subjugating women.

There is no dispute among the scholars that one of the conditions of the imaam or leader is that he should be male. Ibn Hazam reported in his book Maraatib al-Ijmaa’ that there was scholarly consensus on this point. In the section he says: “Out of all groups of the people of the Qiblah [i.e., all Muslim sects], there is not one that allows the leadership of women.” Al-Qurtubi reported something similar, and al-‘Allaamah al-Shanqeeti said, “There is no difference of opinion among the scholars on this point.”

I'm sorry but I stopped reading here. There is a pretty pronounced and acknowledged difference in opinion about this in the Islamic Scholastic Circle.

https://www.banglajol.info/index.php/AFJ/article/viewFile/12941/9305

Leave guns for men only,there are some roles which are simply not suitable for women.I hope feminists will understand that hard reality some day.

History speaks otherwise. There have been nations where women have had extensive combat roles and they did very well for themselves and their people. The Viking Shieldmaidens come to mind. In Islamic history, Khawlah bint al-Azwar was very badass.

Also our army does not hire women for combat roles and all female army officers including maj gen nigar khan belong to the medical corps i.e they are doctors.

Women also serve in the Engineering Corps and administrative roles in the Pakistani Army. They do serve in combat roles in the PAF though.
 
Last edited:
.
Its hilarious to read about people talking about sharia law in Pakistan where lying, cheating, corruption, theft and basically every other vice is not only prevalent, but looked upon as a virtue by many. Yet, some get stuck on the 'women cant do this or that' bullshit
 
.
Back
Top Bottom