Subramanian
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2010
- Messages
- 1,080
- Reaction score
- 0
These protests are just because the church wont be able to convert people in Kanyakumari if this plant comes up.Thats all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
These protests are just because the church wont be able to convert people in Kanyakumari if this plant comes up.Thats all.
^^
There is a point after which you have to stop replying to broken records that keep repeating the same line over and over again. I had already explained the safety features of the new plants to him, and the fact that green energy can't produce a thousandth of what we need.
He keeps coming back with the same two points, and even ridicules the news sources (which happened to be the hindu) when given the statements of authorities in this regard. How many more pages should be devoted to willfully blind people?"
I will try for the last time :
The fukushima plant was 1970 era design with ZERO passive cooling measures. Kudankulam has upto 3-4 passive cooling measures not withstanding the tremendous progress which have been made in both active cooling and passive cooling measures over four decades.
The fukushima plant gave in only after a massive earthquake followed by a tsunami had struck. What are the chances that such things happen in Tamil Nadu. FYI, TN is one of the least geologically active land plates in Indian sub continent. A google search will reveal when was the last time an earthquake( >6.5 richter scale ) occurred in TN.
Also the fukushima plant ( with 1970s design ) withstood about 40 years of high seismic activity throughout everyday. Then finally gave in only on the face of a combination of nature's two large destructive powers.
And finally, Does any one ever talk of another 1970 era Nuclear plant ( ~50kms away ) which was functioning all throughout this fukushima saga ? That 1970 design is still intact. During that fukushima meltdown, aftershocks etc, scores of localites took shelter in the GYM of that nuclear power plant as all their houses were destroyed and they thought the best place to protect them was to go in that nuclear plant.
So, yes theoretically chances that kudankulam nuclear plant will melt can never be zero. But in all likelihood, the probability of it's meltdown will be far lesser than the probability that you meet with a car accident on a highway. ie in all practicality the chances are zero.
I want trinity to refute the arguments purely on a technical basis rather than 'Oh let's use solar/tidal energy' crap.
go to kanykaumari and figure for urself.
If I have to go to KK Dist and find out the fact by myself, why ask you the question in the first place?