What's new

Mamata's Teesta bluff called

BDforever

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
14,387
Reaction score
8
Country
Bangladesh
Location
Bangladesh
Two hydrological surveys of the Teesta river, one by West Bengal’s Irrigation department and the other by a hydrologist appointed by Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, have come up with findings that calls the bluff on her opposition to the water-sharing treaty which India wants to sign with Bangladesh.

Contrary to Banerjee’s claim that sharing the waters of the Teesta River with Bangladesh would cause hardship to the population in North Bengal, a state Irrigation and Waterways department survey has come up with an unexpected finding: the volume of water in the Teesta Barrage reservoir has increased from 4.3 million cubic metres (2007) to 5.5 million cubic metres (2012).

The findings of the survey, called the Teesta Cubature Study, comes at a time when Banerjee is at sixes and sevens over New Delhi’s decision to share Teesta waters with Bangladesh. In August 2011, Banerjee refused to be part of the Indian delegation, led by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, to Dhaka when the Teesta River water sharing treaty was to be signed.

After scuttling the deal, Banerjee announced in November 2011 formation of an expert committee headed by hydrologist Dr Kalyan Rudra to assess the proposed sharing of the Teesta waters between India and Bangladesh. Banerjee had argued at that time that the “water problem” was the result of expansion of the Teesta Barrage and operationalisation of four to five thermal plants.

But it is reliably learnt that though Rudra’s survey shows a reduced water flow in the Teesta, he has apparently argued that it is important to maintain the ‘normal flow’ of the river to save it. Which means the Teesta should be allowed to flow normally into Bangladesh without any major diversion upstream.

Rudra was not willing to comment on his report, which is believed to be with Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee. But top sources in Bengal administration say that Rudra's recommendation has stumped Banerjee because though he talks of a reduced water volume in the Teesta (as opposed to the Irrigation Departmnent findings), he has asked for maintaining of 'normal flow' of the river.

According to the results of the Irrigation and Waterways department’s survey, done in 2011-12 , due to high levels of erosion, there has been more than 20 percent increase in the capacity of the barrage at Gajoldoba in Udalbari in the Dooars. Senior West Bengal government officials told bdnews24.com that “if there is good spell of rains, there could be an overflow and as per the barrage’s design, there will be a discharge 700,000 cu secs of water”.

The sources said that barring three months during the winter season, the volume of water in the reservoir “remains high.”

Since Rudra did not have much resources or time at his disposal and is believed to have failed to lay his hands on the central hydrological data on Teesta, experts feel the Irrigation department survey is more credible.

Even during the 1996 Ganges water sharing treaty with Bangladesh, the West Bengal Irrigation department data on water volume in the river was given much importance by both Delhi and Dhaka.

The fiasco in September 2011, when Banerjee refused to be part of the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh-led delegation to Dhaka, scuttled the accord as the West Bengal Chief Minister did not agree with the quantum of water that India could share with Bangladesh. Needless to say, this had caused a huge embarrassment to India, especially because expectations that the treaty would be signed between Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina Wajed and Manmohan Singh were high.

Singh now wants to sign the treaty this year as both India and Bangladesh head into national parliament elections in early 2014. Indian foreign minister Salman Khurshid and President Pranab Mukherjee have both reportedly assured Sheikh Hasina that the treaty will be signed this year.

But though Mamata Banerjee gave some indication of a softened stand on Teesta by allowing her close lieutenant and MP Mukul Roy to be part of President Mukherjee’s team to Dhaka last month, she has pulled up Mukherjee for committing ‘many things’ to Bangladesh without consulting her.

Analysts however say it is not so much her fears of loosing out on the Teesta waters as her desperation to secure special funds from Delhi to tide over the state’s financial crisis that is prompting Mamata Banerjee to drive a hard bargain with the Central government on the Teesta issue.
source: Mamata's Teesta bluff called - bdnews24.com
 
.
Two hydrological surveys of the Teesta river, one by West Bengal’s Irrigation department and the other by a hydrologist appointed by Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, have come up with findings that calls the bluff on her opposition to the water-sharing treaty which India wants to sign with Bangladesh.

Contrary to Banerjee’s claim that sharing the waters of the Teesta River with Bangladesh would cause hardship to the population in North Bengal, a state Irrigation and Waterways department survey has come up with an unexpected finding: the volume of water in the Teesta Barrage reservoir has increased from 4.3 million cubic metres (2007) to 5.5 million cubic metres (2012).

The findings of the survey, called the Teesta Cubature Study, comes at a time when Banerjee is at sixes and sevens over New Delhi’s decision to share Teesta waters with Bangladesh. In August 2011, Banerjee refused to be part of the Indian delegation, led by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, to Dhaka when the Teesta River water sharing treaty was to be signed.

After scuttling the deal, Banerjee announced in November 2011 formation of an expert committee headed by hydrologist Dr Kalyan Rudra to assess the proposed sharing of the Teesta waters between India and Bangladesh. Banerjee had argued at that time that the “water problem” was the result of expansion of the Teesta Barrage and operationalisation of four to five thermal plants.

But it is reliably learnt that though Rudra’s survey shows a reduced water flow in the Teesta, he has apparently argued that it is important to maintain the ‘normal flow’ of the river to save it. Which means the Teesta should be allowed to flow normally into Bangladesh without any major diversion upstream.

Rudra was not willing to comment on his report, which is believed to be with Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee. But top sources in Bengal administration say that Rudra's recommendation has stumped Banerjee because though he talks of a reduced water volume in the Teesta (as opposed to the Irrigation Departmnent findings), he has asked for maintaining of 'normal flow' of the river.

According to the results of the Irrigation and Waterways department’s survey, done in 2011-12 , due to high levels of erosion, there has been more than 20 percent increase in the capacity of the barrage at Gajoldoba in Udalbari in the Dooars. Senior West Bengal government officials told bdnews24.com that “if there is good spell of rains, there could be an overflow and as per the barrage’s design, there will be a discharge 700,000 cu secs of water”.

The sources said that barring three months during the winter season, the volume of water in the reservoir “remains high.”

Since Rudra did not have much resources or time at his disposal and is believed to have failed to lay his hands on the central hydrological data on Teesta, experts feel the Irrigation department survey is more credible.

Even during the 1996 Ganges water sharing treaty with Bangladesh, the West Bengal Irrigation department data on water volume in the river was given much importance by both Delhi and Dhaka.

The fiasco in September 2011, when Banerjee refused to be part of the Prime Minister Manmohan Singh-led delegation to Dhaka, scuttled the accord as the West Bengal Chief Minister did not agree with the quantum of water that India could share with Bangladesh. Needless to say, this had caused a huge embarrassment to India, especially because expectations that the treaty would be signed between Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina Wajed and Manmohan Singh were high.

Singh now wants to sign the treaty this year as both India and Bangladesh head into national parliament elections in early 2014. Indian foreign minister Salman Khurshid and President Pranab Mukherjee have both reportedly assured Sheikh Hasina that the treaty will be signed this year.

But though Mamata Banerjee gave some indication of a softened stand on Teesta by allowing her close lieutenant and MP Mukul Roy to be part of President Mukherjee’s team to Dhaka last month, she has pulled up Mukherjee for committing ‘many things’ to Bangladesh without consulting her.

Analysts however say it is not so much her fears of loosing out on the Teesta waters as her desperation to secure special funds from Delhi to tide over the state’s financial crisis that is prompting Mamata Banerjee to drive a hard bargain with the Central government on the Teesta issue.
source: Mamata's Teesta bluff called - bdnews24.com

IF you can convince Mamta Didi to do even one sensible thing in her life then I'll personally get the IA to conquer Burma and hand it over to BD.

She will just eat up the reports, not even burp and then proclaim "aye shob cholbena, ami right tomra shob wrong- GHODAR DEEM!".

The GOI has been trying to bat aside the intricacies of coalition politics to get this issue resolved, no luck so far though.
 
.
IF you can convince Mamta Didi to do even one sensible thing in her life then I'll personally get the IA to conquer Burma and hand it over to BD.

She will just eat up the reports, not even burp and then proclaim "aye shob cholbena, ami right tomra shob wrong- GHODAR DEEM!".

The GOI has been trying to bat aside the intricacies of coalition politics to get this issue resolved, no luck so far though.

She is creating distance between Bangladesh-India relation more and more
 
. .
She is creating distance between Bangladesh-India relation more and more


On most things, in the teeth of evidence, prompted by nothing more than an extremely populist stand. Every day that she spends in office damages West Bengal more and more. Her harebrained and totally irresponsible posturing on Bangladesh related issues is only a small facet of her politics. Bangladesh is lucky; they only have to cope with two infants of destructive politics, ours is enough to exceed them both put together by two orders of magnitude.
 
.
On most things, in the teeth of evidence, prompted by nothing more than an extremely populist stand. Every day that she spends in office damages West Bengal more and more. Her harebrained and totally irresponsible posturing on Bangladesh related issues is only a small facet of her politics. Bangladesh is lucky; they only have to cope with two infants of destructive politics, ours is enough to exceed them both put together by two orders of magnitude.

so many times she lost her mind for nothing and did bad mouthing :disagree:
 
.
I think the commies (whom i absolutely detest) were better than her, dont bongs get headaches listening to her ramblings. guess they are stuck with these 2 parties forever. ek jagah kuan toh doosri jagah khayee.
 
.
I think they are more concerned about water flow during winter season, it seems the paper quotes water flow during summer. Despite her regular antics, I can't blame mamta this time. Water is a sensitive issue and goi should have consulter wb government before committing anything to Bangladesh. It's better to decide the terms after scrutinising the reports by the experts.
 
.
Now can someone do us a favor by chucking this psychopath into the Teesta? :cheesy: She's a perfect example of a rabble rouser, not material required for the stature of a chief minister. :no:
 
.
She is creating distance between Bangladesh-India relation more and more

What about Bangladesh always making noise for tiny rivers like Teesta or Barak but won't complain to China regarding mighty Brahmaputra. Bangladesh love to create confrontation.
 
.
What about Bangladesh always making noise for tiny rivers like Teesta or Barak but won't complain to China regarding mighty Brahmaputra. Bangladesh love to create confrontation.

1. if you block tiny river , it dies but big river does not die if it has some flow.
2. China consulted with us about Brahmaputra.
3. some arrogant indian believe they are superior and others are bad.
 
.
She is creating distance between Bangladesh-India relation more and more

She is absolutely NUTS. Now let the people of WB repent at leisure for having voted her into power with such a majority. A sense of discrimination has not been a Bengali attribute.
 
.
Who is ruling a state of India is no concern of Bangladesh. All we can care about and look at is the end result. So Bharat Desh Forever, let Indians worry about India's internal problems and please do not bother us with India's internal problems.
 
.
1. if you block tiny river , it dies but big river does not die if it has some flow.
2. China consulted with us about Brahmaputra.
3. some arrogant indian believe they are superior and others are bad.

Phail logic- Tipaimukh is earthquake prone, Tiapimukh on tiny Barak will make Bangladesh a desert but half of the dozen dams on Brahmaputra is not Earthquake prone, it won't make Bangladesh a desert. Bangladesh's main intension is to always annoy India and this is seen by your bigotry on Brahmputra vs Barak-Teesta.

Can you show any proof that China consulted you, provided you data the same way you are demanding from India.
 
.
IF India can't govern a part of their territory , they should consider giving it independence or better hand over to BD as WB was an integral and historic part of BD.


She is creating distance between Bangladesh-India relation more and more

Typical awamileaguer. Is it that hard to comprehend that there is 0 difference between mamata and GOI. She is an Indian looking after the interest of a state of India. There is no grey line between WB and India. U guys R epic joke when U try to parrot the Indian excuse of "state VS center" to Bangladeshis in water sharing dispute. She is simply following the official policies & tactics of GOI and her country India. What there xyz state does should be none of our concern but the headache of GOI. But then again I arguing with a awami supporter. :undecided:
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom