What's new

Lion of the Desert: Omar Mukhtar – 86 years since Martyrdom

How will a person like Omar Muktar be treated in Today's Muslim world?

  • Non-violent extremist Mullah

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    25
https://www.islam21c.com/latest-islamic/lion-of-the-desert-omar-mukhtar-86-years-since-martyrdom/

2017-09-16_OmarMukhtar_Thum_Draft_6.jpg


On this day 86 years ago (16th September 1931) Omar Mukhtar (rahimahullāh) at the age of 73, was executed and hanged to martyrdom by Italian colonial forces.

Omar Mukhtar was born in the year 1858 in an impoverished household in the region of Cyrenaica which was under the control of the Ottoman Empire. As a young individual Omar lost his father and spent much of his youth in poverty. He was taken under the care and guidance of one of the Mashayakh in his home town.

Omar was known to have developed a lifestyle of not sleeping more than three hours every night in order to worship Allah (subḥānahu wa taʿālā) at the last third of the night and to then recite Qur’an until Fajr. He had memorised the Qur’ān in its entirety and was known as a humble and deeply religious man. He was reported to have completed the recitation of the Qur’ān in its entirety every seven days, irrespective of the trials and tribulations he faced in his life. His wisdom and courage was one that was evident in his life, and as such an example for people to learn and follow.

The Lion’s historical summary
Omar Mukhtar etched his name in the annals of history when he valiantly defended his people, their property and honour by engaging the noble concept of Jihād against the brute of European colonialism. Arguably, the act of resisting an armed occupation through an armed means, was later protected under international law.

It is reported that our hero Omar earned his nickname as Asad al-Sahara’ – ‘Lion of the Desert’ – during his caravan trails to Sudan as a young man. Such a journey was fraught with dangers not least of it being on the route of a fearsome lion. On one such journey, Omar decided to face the danger head on when with a shotgun in hand and on horseback, he pursued the lion and killed it.[1]Omar lived a simple life as a teacher having been educated in the schools of the powerful Sanusi Sufi order.[2]

The despotic occupation
In 1911 however, the Italians made a grab for Libya from the disintegrating Ottoman Caliphate when Omar was approximately 53 years of age. The Italian fascists, led by Benito Mussolini referred to invasion of Libya as the ‘Roman Reconquista’ – “reclaiming” lands which once fell under Roman rule. The usage of the word “Reconquista” was of course interesting given that it is widely associated with the period in history where as part of wider Crusades, Christians set out to conquer Muslim Spain, which they eventually succeeded in.

Omar was deeply concerned about the occupation of their land which had been forcibly and inhumanly taken away from them. He proclaimed that it was their God-given right to resist such injustice as he refused to be conquered. The event marked the beginning of a series of battles between the Italian occupiers and the Muslim forces led by Omar.

The Lion’s resistance
His skills of guerrilla warfare, his strength, spirit and zeal would put one of the world’s most powerful armies at the time, with its superior and modern weaponry and men half his age, to shame. Against Italian tanks and aeroplanes, Omar’s active fighters numbered between 1,000 and 3,000, on horseback and for the most part lightly armed, who trounced Mussolini’s armed forces almost on a daily basis, fighting more than 250 skirmishes and engagements a year. To counter this, the Italian fascists set up concentration camps to target civilians. In 1930, up to 100,000 Bedouin men, women and children – about half the tribal population of Cyrenaica at the time – were herded into desert camps where many died. Much like today with the approach of Israel in their war with Palestinians, the more defeats they would suffer, the more severe the punishments they would afflict on civilians.[3]

After 20 years of resisting and inflicting severe defeats and setbacks to their unwanted European invaders, Allāh sought to elevate Omar’s rank in the hereafter (inshā’Allāh) and immortalise his heroic status in this earthly life when He, in His wisdom permitted that Omar be captured and wounded by Italian colonial forces in 1931. In captivity, Omar was made lucrative offers by the Italians to end the resistance to which he responded that he would not cease to resist:

“until I achieve one of the two highest levels; martyrdom or victory. And I swear by Him who knows what is in men’s hearts that if my hands were not bound this very moment, I would fight you with my bare hands, old and broken as I am.”[4]

At the time of his hanging when asked if he wished to say any last words, he replied with the Qur’anic response: “Innā lillāhi wa innā ilayhī rāji’ūn” Certainly from Allāh we have come, and to Allāh we will return. Twenty thousand concentration camp inmates and Cyrenaican notables were forced to watch Omar Mukhtar’s death.

Omar Mukhtar is well-known for his various statements that only further exemplifies his fearless, brave and courageous character. One of his most recalled and inspirational statements is when he remarked,

“We’ll never surrender, we’ll win or die you’ve to fight the next generation and the next…and I’ll live more than my hanger”

Omar Mukhtar was also known for applying justice and holding to the principles of Islam. During one incident Omar Mukhtar, protected two surviving Italian prisoners, stating that “We do not kill prisoners”. His fellow warrior said “They do it to us.” To which he responded with these majestic words: “They are not our teachers.”

The struggle of Omar Mukhtar which should continue to inspire Muslims in an age where the colonialist and imperialists which started their ceding of Muslim lands at the time of Omar Mukhtar, has continued unabated today through the use of their agents, dictators, ‘terrorist’ groups and despots whom they had played a hand in installing to continue their dominance over the Muslim world.

The symbol of resistance
Indeed, right to this very day, Omar Mukhtar is recognised as a symbol of resistance in the Muslim world. This was not on account of him sitting quietly whilst injustice, tyranny and oppression descended and spread in the land, but rather because he courageously stood up having full certainty of the promise of Allāh and exemplified the verse in the glorious Qur’ān:

“How often has a small party vanquished a numerous host by Allāh’s permission, and Allāh is with the patient.”[5]

Commenting on this verse, Prominent Islamic thinker Syed Qutb says,

“Certainly, they had the advantage of faith in their cause and trust in their leader, but the harsh reality of the situation told them they were the weaker side, and that their faith would be put to the test. Would that invisible force of faith triumph? How strong was their faith in God, and would they be able to harness that force in their favour and prevail?

At that decisive moment, a small group of true believers stood up to express their faith: “But those of them who were certain that they would meet their Lord said, ‘How often has a small host triumphed over a large host by God’s grace. God is with those who remain patient in adversity.” (Qur’ān 2:49)

To the believer’s mind, that is the way it should be: believers are always numerically less than their enemies, because they need to sacrifice more and work harder to earn God’s grace and pleasure. But they triumph because they draw their strength from God Almighty and their faith in Him. The believers are aware that their victory comes from God as a reward for their patience and perseverance.” [6]

It is important that young Muslims revisit the life and thoughts of these great exemplars to gain confidence and to unite to free themselves and the ummah from the grip of the enduring imperialism and coloniality by being upholders of justice and speaking truth to power. It is also worth reminding those who seek to pigeonhole Muslims to divide them by portraying some as ‘violent’ and others as ‘peaceful’, that Omar Mukhtar was in fact a Sufi, part of a group who are today often thought of as being pacifist or otherwise compatible with western hegemony.

We should not let those in contemporary times who claim to wear the garb of Sufism and “peace”, whilst being complicit and providing cover for the crimes of dictators such as Sisi in Egypt or Ramzan Kadyrov in Chechnya as well as others, to misrepresent to us the great tradition of Sufis who have always fought (with their words and deeds) to defend themselves and their communities from aggression and oppression.

A man who was firm in his faith at a time when others fled or surrendered to the occupiers – Omar had reliance in the almighty deeply rooted in his heart. He was a man whom not only regularly read but acted upon and held his Qur’ān high vowing to Allah (subḥānahu wa taʿālā) that he would not discontinue his fight against the occupiers of his land. He strongly believed in this to such an extent that it didn’t bother him if he was alone in this fight until victory had been achieved or that he had attained the righteous status of a martyr. He had directed, guided and personally participated in 1000 battles in the last twenty years of his worldly life.

We ask that Allāh (subḥānahu wa taʿālā) grants Omar Mukhtar (rahimahullāh) and all those who were killed unjustly Jannat al-Firdaus and that He brings about much greater good for their people in this world and the next.



References
[1] Politics of Convenience!: Upset the Balance of Power, by Go Pal

[2] The Making of Modern Libya: State Formation, Colonization, and Resistance, 1830-1932, by Ali Abdullatif Ahmida

[3] Politics of Convenience!: Upset the Balance of Power, by Go Pal

[4] Omar al-Mukhtar : The Italian Reconquest of Libya (1986) by Enzo Santarelli, Giorgio Rochat, Romain Rainero and Luigi Goglia, as translated by John Gilbert

[5] Al-Qur’an 2:249

[6] Fi Zilal al-Qur’an, Surah 2 (Al-Baqarah)

------------------------------------------------

May Allah (swt) accept Omar Mukhtar (rahimahullāh) among the martyr and grant him Jannat al-Firdaus. The most important fact of Omar Mukhtar's legacy that is relevant to our time is that he belonged to a sufi school of thought. The thing is western hippies and liberal secularists "muslims" would have called him a "wahabi" if he was alive today , as because he would not fit in to the post-modern western constructed image of a hippie sufi dancing with non-muslim in dargas & churches, subscribing to vernaculars of Liberalism and supporting corrupt dictators. What more amusing is that a low life secular dictator like Gadaffi & other arab bathist despots had no choice but to publicly show respect to his legacy but in today's age he would have been thrown in a prison cell and tortured by these dictators for his lofty & uncompromising stance against western hegemony and imperialism.
------------------------------------------------------
@Iqbal Ali @Apprentice @Banglar Bir @dsr478 @Zarvan @AUz @Dai Toruko @Verve @HAKIKAT @war&peace @Arsalan @Samlee @Max @Khafee @jamal18 @Narendra Trump @mb444 @Mirzah @shah_123 @Avicenna
@Meengla @Lagay Raho @Dawood Ibrahim @simple Brain @Malik Abdullah
Omar Mukhtar Shaheed was a leader of Libyan resistance movement against occupiers. Indeed hero of Muslim world.


The last companion of Sheikh Omar Mukhtar, Abdul-Razaq Bu Al-Motarabiah Jilkhaf, died in east Libya on Sunday.

Jilkhaf died at the age of 112. He took part in many battles against the Italian colonists who occupied Libya in 1911.
 
. .
The Ottoman Seventh Army was stationed in Tripoli. After Sultan Hamid Han (RA) was brought down by a coup by the Masonic proxy traitors the seventh Army was withdrawn from Tripoli. Only after that the Italians occupied Libya. And, the coup mongers also released Sherif Hussein from the house arrest in Istanbul, so that he could finish the Job....

By the by most of the Ottoman Sultans and leading statesmen and generals belonged to different Sufi orders. And, some reached quite high stations in Ruhaniyet...
 
.
Lion of the desert was a great man. He was not fighting to create a Wahhabi State like the Taliban or ISIS; he was fighting to get rid of Italian colonists. Fighting to liberate one’s home land has nothing to do with religion. North Vietnamese are communist, who don’t believe in any religion whatsoever but they fought the Americans. Needless to remind you that Mustafa Kamal Pasha who defeated the English & the French and liberated Turkey was ‘Secularist’ and changed Turkey into a secular state.

Da'esh main enemy is Hafiz Assad who is a native Syrian. Afghan Taliban were fighting Northern Alliance who were all native Muslim Afghans but not Wahhabi. TTP are not fighting foreign occupation but Pakistan state. That is why we call Taliban and Dae'sh terrorist.

With due respect, kindly look up the definition of secularism before making such a sweeping statement. A secular person will not discriminate on the basis of religion that is all.

I would however agree that difference between a freedom fighter and terrorist is razor thin. Generally, if you lose you are a terrorist but if you win you are a freedom fighter. For example Jewish Haganah was labelled a terrorist organisation by British but their leaders were feted by after Israeli independence.
you sound like a Hamid Mir of PDF.
 
. .
With due respect, kindly look up the definition of secularism before making such a sweeping statement. A secular person will not discriminate on the basis of religion that is all.

Which planet these people live?

liberal/secular values were forced on Turks on gun point,
so please excuse me the talk, how good secularism is.

One excuse or the other, Omar Mukhtar would have been a terrorist today.
 
.
May Allah Grant him and his companions a place in Jannat al firdous
These are the people that should be role models instead of the damned celebrity bs
 
. .
The secularists would have called him terrorist'.
They can go fcuk themselves...invalid cretins.

what i've observed is the more liberal they are the more they hate Pakistan and ISI and PA take xample of tarek fateh or asma jahangir for that matter
Kindly make a correction. Liberal is a positive word. They are not liberal by any stretch of imagination and extension of meanings. They are utterly biased against Islam, Pakistan, and hence Pakistan army. They are libTards or libTurds and if you look around, you will find many. And these are disgusting and shameless creatures because they are characterless beings without any respect for humanity or human life. And they really stink both spiritually and physically. Look at one of them and notice the amount of lanaat by tonnes on her ugly face.
 
.
@Luffy 500 I am a Westoxified sikular Libturd. I place Pakistan Army on a pedestal they reserve Greek gods. If the Pakistan Army had laid to waste the entire Bangla delta. I would be first to salute them. Shooting Mukhto terrorists and teaching Bangla manners was Pakistan Armies finest hour. Even if they went down like the German 6th Army of Gen. Von Paulus.To us nationalists - national armies and nations top everything else.

Now on the subject of Omar Mukhtar - he is my hero. I watched the movie long time ago. He fought against the Italians for his nation. That is to be respected.

Hamid Mir, Pervez hoodbhoy, Gul Bukhari, Marvi Sarmad, Jibran Nasir,Ayesha Siddiqa,Dawn Group Geo Group bhensa Gang and the list goes on they all are liberals
Do not mix hyper secular nationalists liberals like me with these folk. All liberals are not the same anymore then all Muslims are the same.

Frankly if I had power I would have Ayesha Siddiqa, Dawn Group, Tarik Fata, Asma Jahangir placed in a line and shot with a Gatling gun. I would have Tarik Fata in front with Asma second on the line. I don't know enough of the rest but I would exclude Pervez Hoodbhoy. I don't agree with him on many points but he is a brilliant mind - most scientists tend to be ecentric so that can be excused.
 
.
what i've observed is the more liberal they are the more they hate Pakistan and ISI and PA take xample of tarek fateh or asma jahangir for that matter

One can be a Liberal and a Nationalist at the same time. I identify as a liberal but within the National framework. Read up on Liberal Nationalism, I am more liberal than Tarek Fateh as that guy just has hatred for Muslims and Pakistan specifically, while I want to see all religions treated with the utmost respect etc, but I will also gladly give my life for Pakistan and respect it's Islamic character and origins.

On topic: This gentleman is a great icon against Imperialism and self determination, a true Libyan hero. I wonder what he would have felt seeing his country over run by mercenaries with NATO shamefully acting as the terrorists' air force.
 
.
Lion of the desert was a great man. He was not fighting to create a Wahhabi State like the Taliban or ISIS; he was fighting to get rid of Italian colonists. Fighting to liberate one’s home land has nothing to do with religion. North Vietnamese are communist, who don’t believe in any religion whatsoever but they fought the Americans. Needless to remind you that Mustafa Kamal Pasha who defeated the English & the French and liberated Turkey was ‘Secularist’ and changed Turkey into a secular state.

Da'esh main enemy is Hafiz Assad who is a native Syrian. Afghan Taliban were fighting Northern Alliance who were all native Muslim Afghans but not Wahhabi. TTP are not fighting foreign occupation but Pakistan state. That is why we call Taliban and Dae'sh terrorist.

With due respect, kindly look up the definition of secularism before making such a sweeping statement. A secular person will not discriminate on the basis of religion that is all.

I would however agree that difference between a freedom fighter and terrorist is razor thin. Generally, if you lose you are a terrorist but if you win you are a freedom fighter. For example Jewish Haganah was labelled a terrorist organisation by British but their leaders were feted by after Israeli independence.
regarding distinction between terrorist and freedom fighter, it has been made messy post 9/11 when national govts rushed to brand all violent anti govt movement as terrorism.
in India for example kashmiri fighters were called militants most of the time not terrorists... maoists(communist fighters) were not called terrorists either.... simply because they by and large took on govt combatants while leaving civilians alone.
We do need to make the distinction again, if you target civilians to achieve your political objective, you are terrorist, if you only fight govt security forces, you are not a terrorist. Whether you are a freedom fighter does depend on which side you are on.
 
.
Meaning of a Freedom fighter is now looked with glasses of scrutiny. Unless you fit the profile of a friendly allied warrior your personal quest may not appear inline with world power's goals
 
.
Back
Top Bottom