What's new

Lies My History Teacher Told Me

.
If you bother to go back o the beginning of this thread you'll notice an absolute submission and apologetic behavior no question of any sort. Don't put words in my mouth that I have never said.
Am going to ask you again. You said that a 'real' American is one who questioned the government's policies. So then it begs the question of what if the questioner like the answer ?

Ironical how the Yanks could use the Japs as guinea pigs in a lab to test their nukes and get away with it whilst Saddam was killed for stockpiling fertilizer huh ? :D
You have to take that up with the Iraqis since they were the ones who hanged Saddam Hussein. We captured him and turned him over to the Iraqis, remember ? :enjoy:
 
.
Am going to ask you again. You said that a 'real' American is one who questioned the government's policies. So then it begs the question of what if the questioner like the answer ?
Do I have to Question something that I am already agreeing with? Questions are asked when someone is not agreeing with something.

Clay versus United States comes to mind. What a gentleman was Mohammed Ali, despite being a black American he took up the issue as per his conscience and eventually won. Now THAT is how a genuine American thinks and handle matters.
 
.
Do I have to Question something that I am already agreeing with? Questions are asked when someone is not agreeing with something.
Fine...But what if the questioner like the answer ?

If you do not agree with a policy, you have two choices: Either you stand your ground, or give the possibility that you could change your mind if you question the policy.

So...Again...What if the 'real' American questioned his government's policy and it turned out he like the answer ? :enjoy:
 
.
Ironical how the Yanks could use the Japs as guinea pigs in a lab to test their nukes and get away with it whilst Saddam was killed for stockpiling fertilizer huh ? :D

The history of international geopolitics is replete with such examples. Things change all the time.
 
.
Do I have to Question something that I am already agreeing with? Questions are asked when someone is not agreeing with something.

Bro, ignore them, they are just trying to piss you off. They both know it, they are just talking BS.

Ignoring places of strategic military value, and going after populated cities - doesn't take a genius to figure out, what was going on.

People get blinded by their egos / hatred and can't admit, whats wrong is wrong. No two ways about it!
 
.
Fine...But what if the questioner like the answer ?

If you do not agree with a policy, you have two choices: Either you stand your ground, or give the possibility that you could change your mind if you question the policy.

So...Again...What if the 'real' American questioned his government's policy and it turned out he like the answer ? :enjoy:
So be it.
 
.
Clay versus United States comes to mind. What a gentleman was Mohammed Ali, despite being a black American he took up the issue as per his conscience and eventually won. Now THAT is how a genuine American thinks and handle matters.
Right...So Ali became a 'real' American by virtue that his final decision agreed with you. Nothing more than that.

So be it.
That is a cowardly way out, especially when it was YOU who set the condition. A coward's words are no good. Your arguments are hereby worthless.
 
.
Bro, ignore them, they are just trying to piss you off. They both know it, they are just talking BS.

Ignoring places of strategic military value, and going after populated cities - doesn't take a genius to figure out, what was going on.

People get blinded by their egos / hatred and can't admit, whats wrong is wrong. No two ways about it!
You are right brother. Am I wasting my time to convince them? No. I am putting words here for those who might visit this thread and will at-least get to see two different opinions. I am an academicians and do it for academic purposes. With years on this forum, I know all too well that the two I am replying to are incorrigible.
 
.
Bro, ignore them, they are just trying to piss you off. They both know it, they are just talking BS.

Ignoring places of strategic military value, and going after populated cities - doesn't take a genius to figure out, what was going on.

People get blinded by their egos / hatred and can't admit, whats wrong is wrong. No two ways about it!
No one dragged your friend into this. But when he made personal attacks, it was HE who tried to piss people off. Now he got hoisted by his own petard.

You are right brother. Am I wasting my time to convince them? No. I am putting words here for those who might visit this thread and will at-least get to see two different opinions. I am an academicians and do it for academic purposes. With years on this forum, I know all too well that the two I am replying to are incorrigible.
Cuts both ways, academician. But so far, all I see are personal attacks, nothing 'academic' from you, pal.
 
.
That is a cowardly way out, especially when it was YOU who set the condition. A coward's words are no good. Your arguments are hereby worthless.
At-least somebody whose hands are stained with the blood of his own countrymen, who colluded with American oppressors and aggressors in Vietnam, should be last one to call me as coward.
 
.
At-least somebody whose hands are stained with the blood of his own countrymen, who colluded with American oppressors and aggressors in Vietnam, should be last one to call me as coward.
Not sure who you are talking about. For a claimed 'academician', you have a sorry knowledge and understanding of the Vietnam War to talk as if you know enough to make personal attacks against me.
 
.
Not sure who you are talking about. For a claimed 'academician', you have a sorry knowledge and understanding of the Vietnam War to talk as if you know enough to make personal attacks against me.
Then you needed not to responds.
 
. .
Not sure who you are talking about. For a claimed 'academician', you have a sorry knowledge and understanding of the Vietnam War to talk as if you know enough to make personal attacks against me.

It is important to note that even after that recent history, both Vietnam and USA are working together to improve relations and business, just like Japan and USA. :D
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom