Libya 'Could Fall Apart' as East Declares Autonomy

[SyrianChristianPatriot]

Libya setting to fall apart the Militias that fought gaddafi are killing each other now. Now it's going to be rising tensions between benghazi and tripoli.

---------- Post added at 09:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:47 PM ----------

gaddafi days will look like the golden days.

 

[ephone]

Thanks for the west, these following countries' fortunate has been totally fxxked: libya, iraq, afghanistan and etc...

The list will go on...

 

[Shardul.....the lion]

if brits wanted balkanisation of sub continent they would have divided it into all the princley states not just india and pakistan, esp creating some islamic state would have been in their agenda from day one

the mostly balkanised africa and middle east

kashmirissue is the thing which irritates indo pak, if only india had obliged issue of referendum, both have been peaceful

If you know your history, they had balkanised India , they had given option to all princely states to join India or pakistan or remain independant.
Thanks to thoughtfulness of leaders of India and Pakistan, they overpowered all princely states in subcontinent otherwise we would have had 10-15 princely states and India and Pakistan.

 

[Raphael]

^I think India's balkanization was inevitable. If you insist on democracy, the sizeable Muslim minority concentrated in the Northwest and Bengal would have demanded independence.

 

[Shardul.....the lion]

^I think India's balkanization was inevitable. If you insist on democracy, the sizeable Muslim minority concentrated in the Northwest and Bengal would have demanded independence.

Please don't say that you are justifying uighyurs or tibetans demands for seperate nation based on religion or ethnicity.

If being muslim brings you a seperate nations,
then following nations ought to be divided,
Russia
CHina
America
UK

All the above nations have sizable pockets of Muslim in certain pocket areas, and should they demand independence now.

And Raphel, India still has 17 million muslims (3rd largest muslim country), while Pakistan also has 17 million muslims.

Important is nations cannot be made on basis of religion. And India and Pakistan keep on spending Billions of dollars on arms and ammunitions killing each other.
South asia would have been a powerful and progressive areas in the world.

---------- Post added at 09:13 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:10 AM ----------

The past is past.

Point is western nations have played same story in every country they occupied. They divided the country or balkanised the county same will be happening in Libya and Iraq and afghanistan. They are trying to do same wiht Pakistan.

 

[fallstuff]

Eastern Libya has declared autonomy from the rest of the country in a move that authorities in Tripoli had warned could destabilize the territorial integrity of the country.

Tuesdan in the main city of the Libyan east, Benghazi, leaders marked one year from the start of the uprising that ousted and eliminated long-term leader Muammar Gaddafi.

They also declared the petrol-rich eastern province to be semi-autonomous from the central government, asking for federalism.

Participants vowed to end what they saw as a decade-long marignalization of Eastern Libya within the country and appointed a council to manage the affairs of the region.

Ahmed Al-Zubair al-Senussi, long-time political prisoner during the Gaddafi regime and great-nephew to ex Libya king Idris, has been appointed to chair the council.

When built after the Second World War, Libya was formed by uniting the three provinces of Tripolitania, Cyrenaica and Fezzan.

The anti-Gaddafi revolt in 2011 was ignited predominantly in Benghazi in the east, Cyrenaica's main city and Libya's second-largest.

Libya's National Transitional Council, which has governed the country after the ousting of Gaddafi, albeit for a time seated in Benghazi, has repeatedly warned against autonomization of regions, arguing it would lead to a splitting of the country.

I posted something like a year ago that what happens if Libya starts fallin apart ? Sadly it is the truth now.

The morons at the Libya's National Transitional Council thought they got all the support from NATO to build on their dream !!

S . U . C . K . E . R . S

 

[Raphael]

^Woah, calm down. I wasn't talking in terms of justification or morality, only objective observation: democracy results in balkanization, and that's one reason the West loves it so much.

Anyway, Tibet and northern Xinjiang both got annexed around the founding of the PRC. If China had been democratic, then those states probably would be independent. Well not northern Xinjiang - it was a Soviet puppet state kinda like all the other 'stans'.

 

[FairAndUnbiased]

^Woah, calm down. I wasn't talking in terms of justification or morality, only objective observation: democracy results in balkanization, and that's one reason the West loves it so much.

Anyway, Tibet and northern Xinjiang both got annexed around the founding of the PRC. If China had been democratic, then those states probably would be independent. Well not northern Xinjiang - it was a Soviet puppet state kinda like all the other 'stans'.

ROC nominally controlled those lands.

 

[Shardul.....the lion]

^Woah, calm down. I wasn't talking in terms of justification or morality, only objective observation: democracy results in balkanization, and that's one reason the West loves it so much.

Anyway, Tibet and northern Xinjiang both got annexed around the founding of the PRC. If China had been democratic, then those states probably would be independent. Well not northern Xinjiang - it was a Soviet puppet state kinda like all the other 'stans'.

Exactly a strong centralized nations are needed to fight western schemes and plans.

 

[Sasquatch]

^Woah, calm down. I wasn't talking in terms of justification or morality, only objective observation: democracy results in balkanization, and that's one reason the West loves it so much.

Anyway, Tibet and northern Xinjiang both got annexed around the founding of the PRC. If China had been democratic, then those states probably would be independent. Well not northern Xinjiang - it was a Soviet puppet state kinda like all the other 'stans'.

We already had them when the KMT was around. as for Libya it's going to go through a tough time, if the country falls apart.

 

[ephone]

muslim Chinese is only 1.2 to 1.5 percent of total Chinese population. So it is quite tiny. BTW, I think the percentage for it will stay around that way and will not go anywhere up either.

Please don't say that you are justifying uighyurs or tibetans demands for seperate nation based on religion or ethnicity.

If being muslim brings you a seperate nations,
then following nations ought to be divided,
Russia
CHina
America
UK

All the above nations have sizable pockets of Muslim in certain pocket areas, and should they demand independence now.

And Raphel, India still has 17 million muslims (3rd largest muslim country), while Pakistan also has 17 million muslims.

Important is nations cannot be made on basis of religion. And India and Pakistan keep on spending Billions of dollars on arms and ammunitions killing each other.
South asia would have been a powerful and progressive areas in the world.

---------- Post added at 09:13 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:10 AM ----------

The past is past.

Point is western nations have played same story in every country they occupied. They divided the country or balkanised the county same will be happening in Libya and Iraq and afghanistan. They are trying to do same wiht Pakistan.