What's new

Khurram Zaki killed

It's like mercy is only for the Prophet or big shots while the little guys get out their frustrations by being as intolerant as possible. Mohammed or Taseer can have doubts about justice, but not the @Zarvan s and @salarsikander s.

Zaki must have known how unlikely it was that the State would seek out any assassins. Why didn't he arm himself? After all, these killers are not brave people: they traveled in a group and were bent on escape. A sidearm would have been a deterrent.
Hold ypur horses sire, i merely presented the fact that these peple who killed the right activist are found everywhere, just because they have strong standing doesnt mean they are right, same goes for the jews invaders of illegal settlement who are killing Palestinians on daily basis

And stop defaming me as intolerant or you will be reported for insulting me ! when I have unequivocally condemned this act, you on the other hand like a typical hypocrite will deny the murder of poor palestinians .
 
.
Hold ypur horses sire, i merely presented the fact that these peple who killed the right activist are found everywhere -
Murderous criminals are found almost everywhere but not necessarily with a substantial population - including law enforcement elements - that excuses and thus condones them.

...same goes for the jews invaders of illegal settlement who are killing Palestinians on daily -
You're not dumb and I'm pretty sure you've done your own research so you know you're defaming Jews - that is, you're engaged in antisemitism.

...when I have unequivocally condemned this act -
Are you outraged enough by it to become a community leader dedicated to tracking down and prosecuting Zaki's killers and to take up his causes?

...you on the other hand like a typical hypocrite will deny the murder of poor palestinians -
The technique you're trying to employ to divert from the subject topic is called, "throwing a dead cat on the table" - to get everyone to talk about the dead cat, rather than the subject topic. I'm amazed that so many Pakistanis fall for this stuff, rather than call out those who employ it.
 
.
It's ALLAH who knows who actually killed him and why... but my observation is "Some times a dead agent is more usefull than alive", as his death can increase the intensity of task he was assigned for, and the assignment was to create more rift between shia's and sunni's (particularly salafis/diobandis), he is dead but not his masters. So game is not over its going to go till end, in process many zaki are going to come in and then get executed some times by opponents and other time by handlers, just grab popcorn and enjoy,, and work for your akhirat , thats it.

Note: Yes any one can disagree to the core , I DAMN CARE !
 
Last edited:
. .
"Truly! To Allah we belong and truly, to Him we shall return."

" inna lillahi wa innâ ilay-hi raji'oon"
 
.
May his soul rest in peace. He should had been more careful. Being too much vocal regarding LeJ and Sipah e Sahiba in Pak and that too being a Shia always lands you in trouble. He was a good man had interacted him on Facebook quite number of times. Ironically he was against Malala fame as well.
 
. .
It's like mercy is only for the Prophet or big shots while the little guys get out their frustrations by being as intolerant as possible. Mohammed or Taseer can have doubts about justice, but not the @Zarvan s and @salarsikander s.

Zaki must have known how unlikely it was that the State would seek out any assassins. Why didn't he arm himself? After all, these killers are not brave people: they traveled in a group and were bent on escape. A sidearm would have been a deterrent.

the little ones arent allowed to question or think beyond certain limit & as by doing so they risk becoming an infidel .. thus why no mercy

like thousands i followed zaki on social media below is the link to his actual page , people are posting private conversations where in short every one warned him to tighten his security , get a gun etc etc but he refused to do so. there are posts after posts on his page , He was like gandhi , or mandela type wanted to acheive his goals by peaceful means
 
.
A Shia lawer was killed in D.I.Khan a month ago, then 2 more Shia lawers from same bar killed a week ago and on the same day 2 professors in the same city with both spots roughly few km away from each other, and a day after Khurram Zaki targeted in Karachi. But nothing to worry about, may they were all "takfiri's" or at least "Kafirs".
Khuram zaki was Takfiri indeed, because he spoke against deobandi's, about whom everyone now knows that "all deobandi's are not terrorists, but all the terrorists are indeed deobandi's".
If criticizing Mulla Burqa and Sipah Sahaba and demanding their dealing by the law is sectarianism than the most sectarian entity of our country are our Armed Forces who are at many points involved in taking physical whipping actions against them unlike that of the "protests" of Khuram zaki.
We know who killed Khurram, and we know that by which "theory" these people are still nurtured by our "state actors". Time will tell, time will take its revenge, you may have the upper hand today, we will have it some day, and the day is not much far when the oppressed ones will have the might to apply the justice that they were deprived of.
 
.
A Shia lawer was killed in D.I.Khan a month ago, then 2 more Shia lawers from same bar killed a week ago and on the same day 2 professors in the same city with both spots roughly few km away from each other, and a day after Khurram Zaki targeted in Karachi. But nothing to worry about, may they were all "takfiri's" or at least "Kafirs".
Khuram zaki was Takfiri indeed, because he spoke against deobandi's, about whom everyone now knows that "all deobandi's are not terrorists, but all the terrorists are indeed deobandi's".
If criticizing Mulla Burqa and Sipah Sahaba and demanding their dealing by the law is sectarianism than the most sectarian entity of our country are our Armed Forces who are at many points involved in taking physical whipping actions against them unlike that of the "protests" of Khuram zaki.
We know who killed Khurram, and we know that by which "theory" these people are still nurtured by our "state actors". Time will tell, time will take its revenge, you may have the upper hand today, we will have it some day, and the day is not much far when the oppressed ones will have the might to apply the justice that they were deprived of.

If you think blaming the whole sect for terrorism is the way to bring peace in Pakistan thn I advice your sect to move out of Pakistan and live elsewhere because it will be much easier thn killing or converting 70% of the population. secondly Khurram Zaki was a Takfiri If you think your sect can get away after abusing Caliphs and great Sahabas of Islam thn let me remind you its not Iran. In Pakistan Extremist will find you and kill you. If you provoke the sentiments of more thn 70% what else do you expect? To curb the cancer of sectarianism in Pakistan it is must for every sect to respect eachother beliefs. If you cant do that thn stop complaining when other takfiris come and get you.
 
.
It's like mercy is only for the Prophet or big shots while the little guys get out their frustrations by being as intolerant as possible. Mohammed or Taseer can have doubts about justice, but not the @Zarvan s and @salarsikander s.

Zaki must have known how unlikely it was that the State would seek out any assassins. Why didn't he arm himself? After all, these killers are not brave people: they traveled in a group and were bent on escape. A sidearm would have been a deterrent.
There has as yet been no aspiration for the liberals to arm themselves but some day this patience may break. A marginalized group, known as the Ahmedis had a force known as the Furqan force to defend the Pakistani heartland. Minorities and liberals of all groups have often had the urge to defend motherland and people but they do not want to defend the motherland without official sanction, without the law supporting it.

This may be the principle reason. Plus the day of militias have ended. Arming the lashkars even is a big question mark. The reason people dread this arming of liberals is because an example of Afghanistan already exists-warlords with all sorts of weapons freely fighting amongst each other and looting the land in the name of one ethnic or religious group. US used the warlords to invade Afghanistan so Dostum and others operate without the shadow of official or government oversight.

If Americans had to live in the conditions others were led to live in by the US itself they wouldn't be able to survive a day. The Afghans survived somehow though. Pakistanis too.

If you think blaming the whole sect for terrorism is the way to bring peace in Pakistan thn I advice your sect to move out of Pakistan and live elsewhere because it will be much easier thn killing or converting 70% of the population. secondly Khurram Zaki was a Takfiri If you think your sect can get away after abusing Caliphs and great Sahabas of Islam thn let me remind you its not Iran. In Pakistan Extremist will find you and kill you. If you provoke the sentiments of more thn 70% what else do you expect? To curb the cancer of sectarianism in Pakistan it is must for every sect to respect eachother beliefs. If you cant do that thn stop complaining when other takfiris come and get you.
I am shocked by this post and the hatred against shia it represents? I am not a shia but comeon. Cant we live in peace together. Khurram Zaki stood up to terrorists. He is the victim, not the aggressor. This is the reason Pakistan is in a mess. We did the same to a heroine of our nation named Malala and even Abdus Salam. When we can't respect our principal figures how can we develop as a nation. Also where is the proof Khurram abused any sect?
 
.
our media is mourning for this kind of people? sectarian kind does not deserve any sympathy..
Thats mere propaganda before sharing one should question the source ... KZ never said any thing like this if yes show me a proof
 
.
I am shocked by this post and the hatred against shia it represents? I am not a shia but comeon. Cant we live in peace together. Khurram Zaki stood up to terrorists. He is the victim, not the aggressor. This is the reason Pakistan is in a mess. We did the same to a heroine of our nation named Malala and even Abdus Salam. When we can't respect our principal figures how can we develop as a nation. Also where is the proof Khurram abused any sect?

I dont hate Shias but there are people who shamelessly try to insult Sahabas who we Sunnis love and respect alot. They dont accept our books as authentic but they think their books are. In this scenario how can we live together in peace? I have Shia friends and I discuss this problem with them too. Takfiris arent going anywhere until every sect will learn to respect eachother beliefs. you will find Takfirism in every sect and every sect need to understand that instead of pointing fingers on others.
 
.
If you think blaming the whole sect for terrorism is the way to bring peace in Pakistan thn I advice your sect to move out of Pakistan and live elsewhere because it will be much easier thn killing or converting 70% of the population. secondly Khurram Zaki was a Takfiri If you think your sect can get away after abusing Caliphs and great Sahabas of Islam thn let me remind you its not Iran. In Pakistan Extremist will find you and kill you. If you provoke the sentiments of more thn 70% what else do you expect? To curb the cancer of sectarianism in Pakistan it is must for every sect to respect eachother beliefs. If you cant do that thn stop complaining when other takfiris come and get you.
Show me a proof khurram zaki abused any sacred personalities ?
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom