Kashmir was never part of India | Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi addresses Kashmir Conference
- Thread starter zeroboy
- Start date
Umair Nawaz
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2012
- Messages
- 13,407
- Reaction score
- -20
- Country
- Location
we really need to do more for Kashmir, right now its not quit enough being done as compared to whats needed to be done.
MultaniGuy
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2017
- Messages
- 12,243
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
Jammu and Kashmir is not a part of India. The United Nations does not consider Jammu and Kashmir to be an integral part of India.
ashok mourya
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2014
- Messages
- 1,957
- Reaction score
- -22
- Country
- Location
MultaniGuy
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2017
- Messages
- 12,243
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
You ignorant person. United Nations says Kashmir is disputed territory.
Go cry me a river.
ashok mourya
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2014
- Messages
- 1,957
- Reaction score
- -22
- Country
- Location
Give a link @ Iqbal ali
MultaniGuy
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2017
- Messages
- 12,243
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
THE EXPRESS TRIBUNE > PAKISTAN
Kashmir is disputed territory, not 'integral part' of India: Pakistan
SHARE TWEET
Kashmir is disputed territory, not 'integral part' of India: Pakistan
By APP
Published: November 4, 2015
0SHARES
SHARE TWEET EMAIL
PHOTO: AFP
Pakistan firmly rejected on Tuesday an Indian claim to Kashmir as an “integral part” of India, saying it was an internationally-recognised disputed territory.
“The legal and factual background of Jammu and Kashmir dispute is quite clear and efforts to mislead or confuse the international community would not succeed,” Diyar Khan, a minister at the Pakistan Mission to the United Nations, told the General Assembly’s Third Committee, which deals with social, humanitarian and cultural questions.
Non-implementation of UNSC resolutions on Kashmir issue is travesty of law: Maleeha Lodi
“Kashmir is not and cannot be an integral part of India,” the Pakistani diplomat said, adding that the disputed nature of the state was well established by several UN Security Council resolutions that call for a settlement of this problem through a free and impartial plebiscite under the auspices of the United Nations.
Khan was reacting to a statement by Indian delegate Rattan Lal Kataria, who harped on the same old tune that Kashmir was its “integral part” and that Pakistan was in illegal occupation of a part of that “Indian state”. He also claimed that people in Indian-occupied Kashmir had regularly participated in “free, fair and open elections.”
Kataria, a member of the Indian parliament, was responding to Pakistani Ambassador Maleeha Lodhi’s statement in support of Kashmiri people’s right to self-determination.
‘Peace in South Asia linked to solution of Kashmir dispute’
Khan, who was speaking in right of reply to the Indian delegate’s assertions, referred to the argument that Kashmiris had already exercised their right to self-determination through elections, and said it was a fact to all that elections in Indian-occupied Kashmir were not only not recognised by the UN Security Council but also rejected by the people of Kashmir and their representative political leadership.
The Security Council resolutions had also clarified that no electoral exercise conducted by Indian authorities in Jammu and Kashmir could be accepted as a substitute to free and impartial plebiscite under the UN auspices.
Regarding Indian allegations of terrorism, he said it was a motivated campaign to divert attention from the real issue.
“The purpose of Indian allegations was to force Pakistan to stop raising the issue of Kashmir at the UN,” Diyar said.
Pakistan committed to peaceful resolution of Kashmir dispute, PM tells Hurriyat leaders
Referring to the charge that Pakistan was occupying parts of Kashmir, Khan asked India to leave this question to the people of Kashmir. “If only India would agree to the UN plebiscite, as we do, the exercise of this free choice by the people of Jammu and Kashmir would clarify, once and for all, as to who is the real occupying force in Kashmir.”
Meanwhile, another Indian delegate Mayank Joshi, speaking in his right of reply, said the statement delivered by the Pakistani representative on Kashmir was “incompatible with the universally accepted principles” underlined by those of the United Nations Charter and, therefore, rejected his comments.
Again taking the floor, the Pakistani diplomat said his country was not interfering in the internal affairs of India by raising the Kashmir issue at the United Nations.
“May I also remind the Indian delegate that India itself brought this dispute before the United Nations,” he said.
For regional peace: China ready to work with Pakistan, India against terrorism
“India is a large country and we respect its territorial integrity when it comes to its integral parts, but Kashmir is not the integral part,” he added.
https://tribune.com.pk/story/985053...erritory-not-integral-part-of-india-pakistan/
Kashmir is not part of India. Kashmir is a territorial dispute according to the United Nations.
ashok mourya
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2014
- Messages
- 1,957
- Reaction score
- -22
- Country
- Location
Lol.. Pakistani source.. hahahaTHE EXPRESS TRIBUNE > PAKISTAN
Kashmir is disputed territory, not 'integral part' of India: Pakistan
SHARE TWEET
Kashmir is disputed territory, not 'integral part' of India: Pakistan
By APP
Published: November 4, 2015
0SHARES
SHARE TWEET EMAIL
PHOTO: AFP
Pakistan firmly rejected on Tuesday an Indian claim to Kashmir as an “integral part” of India, saying it was an internationally-recognised disputed territory.
“The legal and factual background of Jammu and Kashmir dispute is quite clear and efforts to mislead or confuse the international community would not succeed,” Diyar Khan, a minister at the Pakistan Mission to the United Nations, told the General Assembly’s Third Committee, which deals with social, humanitarian and cultural questions.
Non-implementation of UNSC resolutions on Kashmir issue is travesty of law: Maleeha Lodi
“Kashmir is not and cannot be an integral part of India,” the Pakistani diplomat said, adding that the disputed nature of the state was well established by several UN Security Council resolutions that call for a settlement of this problem through a free and impartial plebiscite under the auspices of the United Nations.
Khan was reacting to a statement by Indian delegate Rattan Lal Kataria, who harped on the same old tune that Kashmir was its “integral part” and that Pakistan was in illegal occupation of a part of that “Indian state”. He also claimed that people in Indian-occupied Kashmir had regularly participated in “free, fair and open elections.”
Kataria, a member of the Indian parliament, was responding to Pakistani Ambassador Maleeha Lodhi’s statement in support of Kashmiri people’s right to self-determination.
‘Peace in South Asia linked to solution of Kashmir dispute’
Khan, who was speaking in right of reply to the Indian delegate’s assertions, referred to the argument that Kashmiris had already exercised their right to self-determination through elections, and said it was a fact to all that elections in Indian-occupied Kashmir were not only not recognised by the UN Security Council but also rejected by the people of Kashmir and their representative political leadership.
The Security Council resolutions had also clarified that no electoral exercise conducted by Indian authorities in Jammu and Kashmir could be accepted as a substitute to free and impartial plebiscite under the UN auspices.
Regarding Indian allegations of terrorism, he said it was a motivated campaign to divert attention from the real issue.
“The purpose of Indian allegations was to force Pakistan to stop raising the issue of Kashmir at the UN,” Diyar said.
Pakistan committed to peaceful resolution of Kashmir dispute, PM tells Hurriyat leaders
Referring to the charge that Pakistan was occupying parts of Kashmir, Khan asked India to leave this question to the people of Kashmir. “If only India would agree to the UN plebiscite, as we do, the exercise of this free choice by the people of Jammu and Kashmir would clarify, once and for all, as to who is the real occupying force in Kashmir.”
Meanwhile, another Indian delegate Mayank Joshi, speaking in his right of reply, said the statement delivered by the Pakistani representative on Kashmir was “incompatible with the universally accepted principles” underlined by those of the United Nations Charter and, therefore, rejected his comments.
Again taking the floor, the Pakistani diplomat said his country was not interfering in the internal affairs of India by raising the Kashmir issue at the United Nations.
“May I also remind the Indian delegate that India itself brought this dispute before the United Nations,” he said.
For regional peace: China ready to work with Pakistan, India against terrorism
“India is a large country and we respect its territorial integrity when it comes to its integral parts, but Kashmir is not the integral part,” he added.
https://tribune.com.pk/story/985053...erritory-not-integral-part-of-india-pakistan/
Kashmir is not part of India. Kashmir is a territorial dispute according to the United Nations.
MultaniGuy
BANNED
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2017
- Messages
- 12,243
- Reaction score
- -6
- Country
- Location
LOL, you quoted wikipedia, you are pathetic. HAHAHA LOL
You Indian internet warriors manipulate wikipedia to suit your narrative.
My source is more credible than wikipedia's at the least!
Even CNN calls Kashmir a dispute, you moron.
India and Pakistan's Kashmir dispute: What you need to know
By Katie Hunt, CNN
Updated 3:58 PM ET, Wed September 27, 2017
[paste:font size="5"]
Current Time0:00
/
Duration Time2:34
Loaded: 0%
Progress: 0%
Now PlayingU.S., UN urge calm after new Kashmir flareup
Source: CNN
U.S., UN urge calm after new Kashmir flareup 02:34
(CNN)It's a stunning region of snow-capped peaks nestled in the Himalayan and Karakoram mountain ranges favored by Bollywood directors.
It's also home to a 69-year conflict -- one of the world's longest running.
India and Pakistan have been fighting over Kashmir since both countries gained their independence in 1947.
How did the trouble start?
The conflict in Kashmir is rooted in the painful birth of India and Pakistan.
Britain relinquished its control of the Indian subcontinent in 1947, splitting it into a predominantly Hindu India and a Muslim Pakistan.
Kashmir was free to accede to either nation.
According to the United Nations, "its accession to India became a matter of dispute between the two countries and fighting broke out later that year."
Who controls what?
India, Pakistan and China all claim partial or complete ownership of Kashmir.
India-controlled: One state, called Jammu and Kashmir, makes up the southern and eastern portions of the region, totaling about 45% of Kashmir.
Pakistan-controlled: Three areas called Azad Kashmir, Gilgit and Baltistan make up the northern and western portions of the region, totaling about 35% of Kashmir.
China-controlled: One area called Aksai Chin in the northeastern part of the region, equaling 20% of Kashmir.
India also alleges Pakistan has ceded 3,220 square miles in Kashmir to China.
The Line of Control divides the Indian- and Pakistani-controlled parts of Kashmir is 435 miles (700 km) long.
The tensions are at their worst in a decade
India and Pakistan have fought three wars against each other since 1947 -- two over Kashmir in 1947 and 1965.
Even after both countries became nuclear powers in 1998, they came close to war once again in 1999.
The Council on Foreign Relations says both countries have maintained a fragile ceasefire since 2003, although the two rivals regularly exchange fire across the border.
The recent tensions are perhaps the worst in a decade.
On September 18, armed militants attacked a remote Indian Army base in Uri, near the Line of Control, killing 19 Indian soldiers in the deadliest attack on the Indian armed forces in decades.
And on September 29, two Pakistani soldiers were killed after clashes with Indian troops on the de facto border between the two countries.
The conflict comes at huge cost
Visitors walk up the Thajiwas glacier in Sonamarg in Kashmir.
The separatist violence has killed more than 47,000 people since 1989, although this toll doesn't include people who have disappeared due to the conflict.
Some human rights groups and nongovernmental organizations put the death toll at twice that amount.
It's also disrupted the region's economy.
It was known as "paradise on Earth" and Indians flocked to Kashmir for vacations in its cooler climate.
But the unrest has meant it has largely been off the tourist circuit for decades.
CNN's Ravi Agrawal and Moni Basu contributed to this report.
https://www.cnn.com/2016/09/30/asia/kashmir-explainer/index.html
SirHatesALot
BANNED
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2013
- Messages
- 3,161
- Reaction score
- -25
- Country
- Location
So what we control it thats what matters.
Similar threads
