What's new

Jinnah | A true proponent of an Islamic Republic.

Kompromat

ADMINISTRATOR
Joined
May 3, 2009
Messages
40,366
Reaction score
416
Country
Pakistan
Location
Australia
Quaid-e-Azam: A true proponent of an Islamic Republic


salute.jpg


Rohail Khan

On the 136th birth anniversary of Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah, founder of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, let his vision of sustaining an independent nation for the Muslims in the subcontinent be renewed with a pledge from us to implement his guidelines and legacies in letter and spirit.

Pakistan commemorates Dec. 25, Jinnah’s birthday, with reverence and fervor. They look back on his deeds and his contemporaries’ sacrifices in giving birth to a nation. They look up to the man described succinctly by Professor Stanley Wolpret in his book “Jinnah of Pakistan.” Simply put it would read that Jinnah was a man with a mission. But what Wolpert penned was so apt that it fitted Jinnah like the well-groomed suit he was nearly always seen in public.

Wolpert, in his scholarly biography of one of the most important political figures of the modern world, neatly summed up Jinnah in these words. “Few individuals significantly alter the course of history. Fewer still modify the map of the world. Hardly anyone can be credited with creating a nation-state. Muhammad Ali Jinnah did all three.”

Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah (1876 - 1948) was an ardent supporter and a strong proponent of a separate state for Muslims of the sub-continent based on Islamic values and teachings. It was his able leadership that enabled him and his followers succeed in the creation of Pakistan on Aug. 14, 1947. That day brought about an unprecedented vitality to the Muslims of the sub-continent generating in its wake an Islamic renaissance and Islamic idealism.

Jinnah’s pre-occupation with political issues left him little time to writing; but his speeches and sayings have been compiled by his staff and admirers into a series of volumes, infused with the need to establish an Islamic Republic for the 100 million Muslims of British India.

Jinnah firmly believed in Islam as a ‘dynamic religion and a way of life’.

“The discipline of Ramadan fasting and prayers will culminate today in an immortal meekness of the heart before God,” he said in a broadcast speech on Eid day, “but it shall not be the meekness of a weak heart, and they who would think so are doing wrong both to God and to the Prophet (pbuh).

“For it is the outstanding paradox of all religions that the humble shall be the strong, and it is of particular significance in the case of Islam. For Islam, as you all know, really means action. This discipline of Ramadan was designed by our Prophet to give us the necessary strength for action

Jinnah’s liberal passion for Islam had a long-lasting impact on the minds and souls of the 100 million Muslims striving for a separate Muslim state, turning their intellectual activities toward tackling traditional Islamic ideals in terms of modern standards and requirements.

Religion for Jinnah implied not only as a duty toward God but also as a duty to mankind.

“Man has indeed been called God’s caliph in the Qur’an, and if that description of man is to be of any significance, it imposes upon us a duty to follow Qur’an, to behave toward others as God behaves toward his mankind, in the widest sense of word, His duty is to love and to forebear.

“If we have any faith and love for tolerance toward God’s creations, to whatever community they belong, we much act upon that faith in the daily round of our simple duties and unobtrusive pieties. It is a great ideal and it will demand effort and sacrifice. “Not seldom will your minds be assailed by doubts. There will be conflicts not only material, which you perhaps will be able to resolve with courage, but spiritual also. We shall have to face them and if today, when our hearts are humble we do not imbibe that higher courage to do so, we never shall.”


The+Quaid+addressing+the+press+with+Mr+Liaquat+Ali+Khan.jpg


At the inaugural session of Jamiat Ulema Islam in Calcutta in Nov. 1945, Maulana Ghulam Murshid, Imam of Badshahi Mosque, Lahore, met with Quaid e Azam and received a definite assurance from him that the injunctions of the Holy Qur’an alone would be the basis of law in the Muslim state. In a letter to Pir Sahib of Manki Sharif in November 1945, Quaid-e-Azam said, “It is needless to emphasis that the Constituent Assembly which would be pre-dominantly Muslim in its composition, would be able to enact laws for Muslims, not inconsistent with the Shariah laws, and the Muslims will no longer be obliged to abide by the un Islamic laws.” - In a public meeting with Maulana Shabbir Ahmad Usmani in June 1947, the Quaid assured that an Islamic constitution would be implemented in Pakistan.

Speaking on a reform scheme at Sibbi Derbar on Feb. 4, 1948, Quaid-e-Azam proclaimed: “In proposing this scheme, I have had one underlying principle in mind, the principle of Muslim democracy. It is my belief that our salvation lies in following the golden rule of conduct set for us by our great lawgiver the Prophet of Islam. Let us lay the foundations of our democracy on the basis of truly Islamic ideals and principles.”

In a broadcast talk to the people of Australia, Feb. 1948, the Quaid spoke of the Islamic characteristics of Pakistani society in these words: “The great majority of us are Muslims. We follow the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). We are the members of the brotherhood of Islam in which all are equal in rights, dignity and self-respect. “Not only are most of us Muslims but we have our own history, customs and traditions and those ways of thought, outlook and instinct who go to make up a sense of nationality.”

In a radio broadcast to the people of the United States of America in Feb. 1948, he spoke of Islamic system of government to be adopted in Pakistan. “The constitution of Pakistan has yet to be framed by the Pakistan Constituent Assembly. I do not know what the ultimate shape of this constitution is going to be, but I am sure that it will be of a democratic type, embodying the essential principles of Islam. Today they are as applicable in actual life as they were 1,300 years ago. Islam and its idealism have taught us democracy. “It has taught equality of man, justice and taught us democracy. It has taught equality of man, justice and fair play to everybody. We are the inheritors of these glorious traditions and are fully alive to our responsibilities and obligations as framers of the future constitution of Pakistan.”

Whenever Jinnah got an opportunity to speak on Islam, he advocated a rational approach. “In pursuit of truth and cultivation of beliefs,” he said, “we should be guided by our rational interpretation of the Qur’an, and if our devotion to truth is single-minded, we shall, in our own measure, achieve our goal. In the translation of this truth into practice, however, we shall be content with so much, as so much only, as we can achieve without encroaching on the rights of others, while at the same time not ceasing our efforts always to achieve more

In another context, the great Quaid remarked: “The test of greatness is not the culture of stone and pillar and pomp but the culture of humanity, the culture of equality. Only a man who is dead to all the finer instincts of humility and civilization can call a religion based on exploitation a heritage.”

He was outspoken in his condemnation of reactionary elements that generate negative tendencies. Dealing with the contribution of Pakistan movement toward eradication of fundamentalism, the great Quaid said: “We have to, a great extent, free our people from the most undesirable reactionary elements. We have in no small degree removed the unwholesome influence and fear of a certain section that used to pass off as Islamic fundamentalists.” - Jinnah championed the cause of womanhood, advocating for women an equal share with men in social and national life as per the Islamic teachings.

download.jpg


“In the great task of building the nation and maintaining its solidarity, women have a most valuable part to play. They are the prime architects of the character of the youth who constitute the backbone of the state. I know that in the long struggle for the achievement of Pakistan, Muslim women have stood solidly behind their men. In the bigger struggle for the building up of Pakistan that now lies ahead let it not be said that the women of Pakistan had lagged behind or failed in their duty

Like a true Muslim, the great Quaid was incorruptible. The Last British Viceroy Lord Mountbatten rightfully admitted when he said: “I tried every trick I could play to shake Jinnah’s resolve. Nothing would move him from his consuming determination to realize the dream of Pakistan.”


image057v.jpg


On his birthday, today, let us once again take the great Quaid’s directives to make our nation and us proud. As Jinnah rightly pointed out that Islam should be the basis of our lives, and today we all the more need to heed Jinnah’s call to follow Islamic values to sustain Pakistan in its march toward progress and development.



Saudi Gazette - Quaid-e-Azam: A true proponent of an Islamic Republic
 
Some puppets of west tried hard to show Quaid a secular,but they failed.

Salute to our Quaid and all those who sacrificed their lives for pakistan.
 
Wolpert, in his scholarly biography of one of the most important political figures of the modern world, neatly summed up Jinnah in these words. “Few individuals significantly alter the course of history. Fewer still modify the map of the world. Hardly anyone can be credited with creating a nation-state. Muhammad Ali Jinnah did all three.”/QUOTE]

No Doubt, Jinnah did all this. We have to follow Jinnah , his ideology to make Pakistan as he wished.
 
veru well written artical on my one of the most favourite personalities ........
 
Quaid-e-Azam: A true proponent of an Islamic Republic
This entire article is a lie and based on false information. It was Bhutto who established Islamic Republic of Pakistan NOT Jinnah.
If you can provide any evidence of his Islam practices like fasting during ramadan, his prayers, hajj and umerah only then he can be associated with "Muslim leader". Just making a mere speech does not make one a "ISLAMIC" leader.
 
The concept of the*Two-Nation Theory*on whichPakistan*was founded, was largely based on Muslim nationalism[1]Secularism*in Pakistan*went from being a matter of practice in law by the*Government of Pakistan*to a political movement opposing theIslamization policies*of the*military dictator*GeneralZia-ul-Haq*in the 1980s. The supporters of secular policies argue that the*Founding fathers*and*founderof*State of Pakistan,*Muhammad Ali Jinnah, had desired to see Pakistan as a Muslim-majority secular state that would be free of*theocracy*and provide equal rights to the*minorities, by referring to his address to the*Constituent Assembly of Pakistanon August 11, 1947. They also point out that Jinnah did not take any concrete steps to turn Pakistan into an Islamic state. Had Pakistan come into being for the introduction of Islamic laws, Jinnah would not named*Jogendranath Mandal, a Hindu as Pakistan's first*Law minister, and*Victor Turner, a Christian as Pakistan's first*Finance*and*Statistics minister, they argue.

The supporters of Islamisation on the other hand assert that Pakistan was founded as a Muslim state and that in its status as an*Islamic republic, it must thereby implement Islamic laws, known as*Shariat. And that the context of Jinnah's speech was true implementation of Islam in which all religions would have equal rights and live as free citizens as supported by the Islamic jurisprudence itself as distinguished from a religious oligarchy.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secularism_in_Pakistan
 
Challenge should be perfecting the Islamic Republic, not questioning it's right to exist.
 
Some puppets of west tried hard to show Quaid a secular,but they failed.

Salute to our Quaid and all those who sacrificed their lives for pakistan.

I think even some Indian author have suggested him as a secular person... I disagree. If Jinnah was secular, then so is modi. :coffee:
 
What amazes me a lot is that despite of being a champion of an Islamic Republic,Mr.Jinnah was no fundamentalist. He was more fluent in quoting Shakespeare in his commentaries rather from Quran. Historians today believe,had it been Mr.Motilal Nehru and Mr.Jinnah took the charge of leadership of the Congress in the 20's,independence would have achieved much before of 1947.

When the entire subcontinent was witnessing the mass murder,plunders and rapes on both sides of the border,this gentleman left no attempt to stop the carnage.His party did its best although in vein to halt the fleeing of rich,prosperous and established but distressed 4 million minorities to India.

I really believe,without being much engrossed into details of his political career,if this gentleman had been alive for another ten years,we could have seen a different Pakistan and different settlement between the two arch rivals of this subcontinent.
@Aeronaut
 
Last edited by a moderator:
What amazes me a lot is that despite of being a champion of an Islamic Republic,Mr.Jinnah was no fundamentalist. He was more fluent in quoting Shakespeare in his commentaries rather from Quran. Historians today believe,had it been Mr.Motilal Nehru and Mr.Jinnah took the charge of leadership of the Congress in the 20's,independence would have achieved much before of 1947.

When the entire subcontinent was witnessing the mass murder,plunders and rapes on both sides of the border,this gentleman left no attempt to stop the carnage.His party did its best although in vein to halt the fleeing of rich,prosperous and established but distressed 4 million minorities to India.

I really believe,without being much engrossed into details of his political career,if this gentleman had been alive for another ten years,we could have seen a different Pakistan and different settlement between the two arch rivals of this subcontinent.

@Aeronaut


Talk about bad luck.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And then came the ulema of deoband to save Pakistan from qadianis and shia influences. Didn't the jamaat call Pakistan napakistan and qaid e azam as kafir e azam? why is jamat e islami allowed to wander around freely while it opposed the creation of Pakistan and jamaat e ahmadiyya which put its full support between Qaid e azam restricted and banned in some things?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom