What's new

Japanese boat crashes into US Navy destroyer in Pacific Fleet’s 5th collision this year

Well, I don't know this "Everyone" but the report itself said the Report DID NOT CONSIDER the action on the other party. You can say whatever the hack you want, but the report said what the report said.

Either you are seeing things that weren't there, or you are the one that is lair to people face about it, because all you do is to quote a "Third Hand Account" and I quote the official report.

Now, if everyone sees what you said, then either you are lying or everyone's is wrong.

Take your pick, poser.
There is a different between " did not consider the action on the other party" vs " USN is NOT AT FAULT of the collision"

Everybody can see that, Then you trying to tell us USN IS NOT AT FAULT for both collision just becos of your interpretation of a small wording in report by USN.

:lol: :lol: :lol: The loser is you, you lose big time. :rofl:
 
.
There is a different between " did not consider the action on the other party" vs " USN is NOT AT FAULT of the collision"

Everybody can see that, Then you trying to tell us USN IS NOT AT FAULT for both collision just becos of your interpretation of a small wording in report by USN.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

A.) I NEVER said USN Officer was not at fault, I said USN did not caused these collision, or rather, the cause of the collision is too early to determined. Go back and read my statement 5 months ago. On day two after Fitzgerald collided with Crystal, I already said the Captain is responsible for the dead and he will be relief of duty.
B.) You failure to understand person at fault does not mean they caused the collision, because to determine the cause, you ALWAYS need to consider the action of THE OTHER PARTY.
C.) Yes, you cannot determine the root cause of the collision until you consider all action by both party involved in the collision.

And by the court of law, IF YOU HAVE TO ACCUSE THE US Navy causing this collision, you need to show proof beyond reasonable doubt, because at the report, it stated why the people were dead, not who caused the collision. And ultimately responsible for the collision.

Unless you know something I don't, the SecNav don't and the US Navy don't all you said is brain fart quoted by a third person, and I can claim a lot of stuff too, that does not mean I can back up with facts. And if that is the case, you are intentionally misleading people, and lie about the point.
 
.
A.) I NEVER said USN Officer was not at fault, I said USN did not caused these collision, or rather, the cause of the collision is too early to determined. Go back and read my statement 5 months ago. On day two after Fitzgerald collided with Crystal, I already said the Captain is responsible for the dead and he will be relief of duty.
B.) You failure to understand person at fault does not mean they caused the collision, because to determine the cause, you ALWAYS need to consider the action of THE OTHER PARTY.
C.) Yes, you cannot determine the root cause of the collision until you consider all action by both party involved in the collision.

And by the court of law, IF YOU HAVE TO ACCUSE THE US Navy causing this collision, you need to show proof beyond reasonable doubt, because at the report, it stated why the people were dead, not who caused the collision. And ultimately responsible for the collision.

Unless you know something I don't, the SecNav don't and the US Navy don't all you said is brain fart quoted by a third person, and I can claim a lot of stuff too, that does not mean I can back up with facts. And if that is the case, you are intentionally misleading people, and lie about the point.

THis is what you say in your previous post. :enjoy: Then you just quote a small insignificant statement from USN report try whitewash everything about USN fault. You make me look like a genuis :lol:
Baliba - Do I looks like I know what happened? From the beginning to the end, I am saying we need more information to say who's fault is it, you, on the other hand calling it was the US Navy fault.

Then Genius, PROVE TO ME THE US NAVY IS AT FAULT ON THIS.
 
.
THis is what you say in your previous post. :enjoy: Then you just quote a small insignificant statement from USN report try whitewash everything about USN fault. You make me look like a genuis :lol:

Again, I am not the one who had already determined who's causing this collision with minimal knowledge on the collision. You are.

So, either you know something everybody don't know, or you are lying you arse off for it. I don't really care.

In the end, you keep saying CNO said he blame the US navy, but I watched the whole New COnference again on Nov 2 with the CNO, I did not hear him saying that, so either that, again is a straight up lies or your comprehension ability is flawed.

So, for you to be so determined that is the US navy fault, which either mean you know something we all don't, or you are lying.

If you claim I am white washing, show proof or shut up.
 
.
Again, I am not the one who had already determined who's causing this collision with minimal knowledge on the collision. You are.

So, either you know something everybody don't know, or you are lying you arse off for it. I don't really care.

In the end, you keep saying CNO said he blame the US navy, but I watched the whole New COnference again on Nov 2 with the CNO, I did not hear him saying that, so either that, again is a straight up lies or your comprehension ability is flawed.

So, for you to be so determined that is the US navy fault, which either mean you know something we all don't, or you are lying.

If you claim I am white washing, show proof or shut up.

Quote - Check
Proof - Check
:lol:

The only one in denial is you.
 
.
@waz @The Eagle

Please look into this forumer behavior and language



You sounds desperate. Everything you try denial is presented perfectly by me. The ugly one is you. You just make a fool of USN with every of your despo denial. :lol:

Am I supposed to indulge any fan boy thoughts?

No, again, you did not show any proof beside some "Third Party" website, CNO did not even said what you said, yet you are the one that calling "Quote - Check, Proof - Check"

I can say a lot of thing and I just try to round the diamond head with you and have the so called "discussion" going nowhere, I don't do that, cause I am not a loser.

You, on the other hand, think you are 6 ft tall but in fact you are just walking in someone else shadow.

As I said before, I don't really care about whose fault is it, I was not in the Navy, I have no sentimental value toward these sailor, nor would I care about what you think. You are of course free to think what you want, but in the end, you need to do what you need to do, you can claim whatever you want but if you cannot back up by facts, then it's just brain fart, it worth nothing more than I can claim Sun rise from the west or China is a stupid country or Chinese Government is a useless dictatorship.
 
.
Am I supposed to indulge any fan boy thoughts?

No, again, you did not show any proof beside some "Third Party" website, CNO did not even said what you said, yet you are the one that calling "Quote - Check, Proof - Check"

I can say a lot of thing and I just try to round the diamond head with you and have the so called "discussion" going nowhere, I don't do that, cause I am not a loser.

You, on the other hand, think you are 6 ft tall but in fact you are just walking in someone else shadow.

As I said before, I don't really care about whose fault is it, I was not in the Navy, I have no sentimental value toward these sailor, nor would I care about what you think. You are of course free to think what you want, but in the end, you need to do what you need to do, you can claim whatever you want but if you cannot back up by facts, then it's just brain fart, it worth nothing more than I can claim Sun rise from the west or China is a stupid country or Chinese Government is a useless dictatorship.

You are the one who start the ball rolling by insulting everything about PLA with nonsense and selective posting but faking accounts and even bragging as Chinese citizens.

While we dont even need to fake anything because US military is not as mighty and professionalism like you US fanboy trying to portray from Hollywood. From so many countless incident of US military ill discipline. It need not take a genius to conclude the professionalism level of US military.

All we take is just present facts and link happen in real life, no editing or spice up. Nothing but truth. Guess some fanboy is so hurt about his shatter of US military image. :lol:

I guess my post has wake many PDF reader and User about the real US military. I am so delighted. :enjoy:
 
.
You are the one who start the ball rolling by insulting everything about PLA with nonsense and selective posting but faking accounts and even bragging as Chinese citizens.

While we dont even need to fake anything because US military is not as mighty and professionalism like you US fanboy trying to portray from Hollywood. From so many countless incident of US military ill discipline. It need not take a genius to conclude the professionalism level of US military.

All we take is just present facts and link happen in real life, no editing or spice up. Nothing but truth. Guess some fanboy is so hurt about his shatter of US military image. :lol:

I guess my post has wake many PDF reader and User about the real US military. I am so delighted. :enjoy:

Your post did wake people, just not as you thought.

Your post awake how Chinese poster (or perceived Chinese Poster) can be so annoying and rascal about something and would not even use logic or common sense to think about something. And that perceived Chinese like you are just a bunch of yahoos.

At times I really think you are not a Chinese but a person who are pay to portrait the Chinese in a bad light because I was educated in China, and honestly, I have been to some crappy school in China, still, your way of thinking, I don't think anyone can top that.

As I said, you can believe what you want, and as a matter of fact, I want you and encourage you to think US military is nothing, that would make the US Military job easier.
 
. .
Your post did wake people, just not as you thought.

Your post awake how Chinese poster (or perceived Chinese Poster) can be so annoying and rascal about something and would not even use logic or common sense to think about something. And that perceived Chinese like you are just a bunch of yahoos.

At times I really think you are not a Chinese but a person who are pay to portrait the Chinese in a bad light because I was educated in China, and honestly, I have been to some crappy school in China, still, your way of thinking, I don't think anyone can top that.

As I said, you can believe what you want, and as a matter of fact, I want you and encourage you to think US military is nothing, that would make the US Military job easier.

Bruh, online you can make any fantasy as who you are but don't mean anyone will believe you. No Chinese would use "Boy" to address others. That's what rednecks do to black people.
 
.
Stop to divert the attention. More like you desperate trying to project US supremacy and project US is the world forces. In fact, its the most hated and ill discipline cowboy armed forces in the world after ISIS.
Most hated ? Every time there is a disaster somewhere, everybody calls for the USN.

Ill discipline ? The US military sets the standards upon which your PLA reformed itself. You cannot set standards if you are 'ill discipline'.

Whenever you use the phrase 'in fact', you better be able to back up your claim.

Bruh, online you can make any fantasy as who you are but don't mean anyone will believe you. No Chinese would use "Boy" to address others. That's what rednecks do to black people.
Yah...Just use 'monkey' instead. That is more acceptable, especially to the admin staff here.

tug boat with no propulsion hitting a big ship, nuff said

The tug is towing the destroyer, which mean they are at extreme close range, if a tug boat lost propulsion when it is towing the ship and drift into you at close range, there are no where you can go.

It's not like they were miles apart and there are more than enough room to dodge a non-seaworthy ship. I don't care how advance you are but if you are in a big truck and a motorcycle lost control and heading your way, unless there are some distant between you and the motorcycle, you are gonna get hit no matter what.

What do you want the destroyer to do? Shoot the tug boat down? I don't think they have enough time to unhook the towline.
Do you really think these guys are interested in details like 'tug boat' and its operations based upon its design ?

https://www.maritimeinjurycenter.com/accidents-and-injuries/tugboat/

Basic research have never been these guys' intellectual strength, remember ?
 
. .
Guys, this is not an accident. It is natural selection. This is how US navy improves and becomes even more professional.
 
. .
We never follow your training standard and US has demonstrated their training method is the worst consider the kind of ill soldier like trigger happy US produced.

We/PLA have the best training method to turn out the finest soldier that US cannot even matched. They don't rape, murder, drunk driving and draw penis on sky like the US counterpart when in service

Because the US has greatly reduced the standard to recruit soldiers. They often represent the lowest of their social strata. Often times, they are desperate and need to pay for some bank credit. Otherwise, a US soldier has a much greater chance to be killed in an immoral war than any other country; hence, smart guys like Trump or Bush never do military service even when it is required.
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom