There is a different between " did not consider the action on the other party" vs " USN is NOT AT FAULT of the collision"Well, I don't know this "Everyone" but the report itself said the Report DID NOT CONSIDER the action on the other party. You can say whatever the hack you want, but the report said what the report said.
Either you are seeing things that weren't there, or you are the one that is lair to people face about it, because all you do is to quote a "Third Hand Account" and I quote the official report.
Now, if everyone sees what you said, then either you are lying or everyone's is wrong.
Take your pick, poser.
Everybody can see that, Then you trying to tell us USN IS NOT AT FAULT for both collision just becos of your interpretation of a small wording in report by USN.
The loser is you, you lose big time.