What's new

J-20, J-10B, JF-17, the complete line up from CAC

Joined
Oct 15, 2017
Messages
28,401
Reaction score
-82
Country
Canada
Location
Canada
Only China builds large class J-20, medium class J-10B, small class JF-17. No other country has a complete line up like China does. CAC is the only company that incorporates DSI on large multi role jets, medium multi role jets, small multi role jets. No other company does so. DSI is round bump. Most effective at deflecting incoming radio away from engine. And no splitter means no gap between intake and main fuselage which means much less RCS.



 
Last edited:
.
Only China builds large class J-20, medium class J-10B, small class JF-17. No other country has a complete line up like China does. CAC is the only company that incorporates DSI on large multi role jets, medium multi role jets, small multi role jets. No other company does so. DSI is round bump. Most effective at deflecting incoming radio from engine.



another baseless thread everyone know that @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
And US/Russian/EU did the same thing in a distant Past @undertakerwwefan ;):enjoy:
 
. . .
Planes that don't have DSI have splitter causing huge gap between intake and main fuselage. Big RCS.

F22%20front%20view%20tight.preview.jpg
 
. . .
.
.
.
LM never claimed F-22 has 0.0001 m^2 X band reflectivity in the front.
Most experts respected website like jane's/filght global/Aviation weekly estimate that you paranoid brain fart @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
and F-22 is a highly classified system, F-22 have a 0.000.1 square meter or bettter but surely not worst @undertakerwwefan :blah::blah::blah:

There are papers about the RCS calculations of Su-57 and J-20.
Are there those about F-22 and F-35? Any information?
:disagree:
 
.
Most experts respected website like jane's/filght global/Aviation weekly estimate that you paranoid brain fart @undertakerwwefan :hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:
and F-22 is a highly classified system, F-22 have a 0.000.1 square meter or bettter but surely not worst @undertakerwwefan :blah::blah::blah:

No it doesn't. Solar panel can't even absorb 15% of radiation and you think RAM can? BS.
 
. .
Anyway. You can see DSI eliminates the splitters and therefore the gaps between the intakes and the main fuselage, and the bumps are big and round and have high deflection of incoming radio. All that means DSI makes the front of a plane have much less radio reflection. The proposed F-22B would have gotten DSI but alas Democrats killed F-22 in 2009 right after they took the House, the Senate, the White House.

J-20 front

2j349jk.jpg


F-22 front

F22%20front%20view%20tight.preview.jpg


It is very ridiculous, isn't it?
Why not are there some papers about RCS calculations of Su-57, J-20, F-22 and F-35 at the same time?
@Deino

Discovery Channel was doing a show for kids at an airbase and they asked a pilot what is the RCS of F-22 and the pilot blurted a bumble bee, which is taken to be something like 0.0001 m^2 or a 1 cm by 1 cm square. Anyway the pilot was joking because the show was for kids, not to be taken seriously.
 
Last edited:
.
Discovery Channel was doing a show for kids at an airbase and they asked a pilot what is the RCS of F-22 and the pilot blurted a bumble bee, which is taken to be something like 0.0001 m^2 or a 1 cm by 1 cm square. Anyway the pilot was joking because the show was for kids, not to be taken seriously.
I want something like this:
8c6a2af41bd5ad6edfbd000f83cb39dbb7fd3c7b.jpg
113b04a4462309f7f81ac9f7700e0cf3d6cad64b.jpg
 
.
Back
Top Bottom