What's new

It’s Possible Afghanistan Can’t Protect Its Own Bases

pakistani342

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Messages
3,485
Reaction score
6
Country
United States
Location
United States
ANA Zendabod, it seems that the ANA may not be able to defend its bases. Article here excerpts below:

....

Casualties aren’t the only issue. “They have a desertion problem,” John Pike, director of the military information Website GlobalSecurity.org, said of the Afghan security forces. Starting in September 2013, Kabul lost more than 30,000 security personnel to all sorts of attrition including desertion, SIGAR found.

Afghanistan’s military could “eventually disintegrate” from all these losses, Pike told War Is Boring.

...

The Afghan government might also be worried that the previous security guards were corrupt, disloyal or otherwise unreliable. Historically, countries often create new military units when they “can’t count on the loyalty of the existing forces,” Pike noted.

The new personnel “will not be drawn from local areas, local groups or local organizations surrounding particular facilities,” the recent policy prescriptions explain. This provision would imply Afghan officials are concerned about insurgent groups infiltrating the new FPF.

...

That is, assuming Afghanistan hasn’t “imploded” by then, Pike warned.

 
ANA is not an 'Army', its a 'security force' similar to Pakistan's Rangers and FC. The Afghan 'Army' is yet to be raised.
 
ANA is not an 'Army', its a 'security force' similar to Pakistan's Rangers and FC. The Afghan 'Army' is yet to be raised.

plz don't degrade Pakistan's Rangers or FC to that level ....
 
Afghan army is useless

A private security firm can hold a base longer than afghan army
 
I'm talking about the 'role'

even in the terms of 'role' they stand tall to 'defend' .... not like 'ANA' ... only fair comparison for ANA is their predecessor military force of Afghanistan Military of the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan.
 
Back
Top Bottom