What's new

Islands in focus: All Bangladeshi citizens to be deported

In 1971 Indira Gandhi started campaign all over the world aying that 10 million refugees from East Pakistan flooding in India. And they cant take the burden anymore. So she said India has no other option than intervene in East Pakistan.

Similar situation has arisen now in Arakan. If Myanmar keep on pushing their people in BD then we dont have any other option than intervene in the situation directly. This message should go in Myanmar and to the world.

We have this high moral ground to support their legitimate war. So we should allow them bases in our territory and coordinate with them according to our 1971 freedom war model. And try to convince India China Russia and USA to be on our side.

Yep, that's right. Let's arm and train the Mujahids and let them loose upon the Burmese.
 
. .
BD has 3 times the GDP of Myanmar and this is expected to continue for the foreseeable future.

Let us say BD is only 2 times the military power of Myanmar, then it is perfectly feasible to capture bordering Rakhine which is only around 5 percent of the total land area of Myanmar. I never said anything about driving to the capital of Myanmar and capturing that.
GDP has no correlation with war prowess.Combined assets of Viet Cong was peanuts compared to US but they still gave US a bloody nose.Before declaring war,it is important to calculate whether country can afford it or not because war is a very costly affair.Look at US,600 billion deficit.Myanmar,being a military oriented country with nothing to lose can afford it but Bangladesh being a economic growth oriented country still trying to bring its population to the upper echelons of class may not be able to bear the brunt.
Regarding Area of Contact,you have to consider that Myanmar has a stronger Navy and your land route is densely forested thus increasing number of choke points and ambush quarters.
 
Last edited:
.
GDP has no correlation with war prowess.Combined assets of Viet Cong was peanuts compared to US but they still gave US a bloody nose.Before declaring war,it is important to calculate whether country can afford it or not because war is a very costly affair.Look at US,600 billion deficit.Myanmar,being a military oriented country with nothing to lose can afford it but Bangladesh being a economic growth oriented country still trying to bring its population to the upper echelons of class may not be able to bear the brunt.
Regarding Area of Contact,you have to consider that Myanmar has a stronger Navy and your land route is densely forested thus increasing number of choke points and ambush quarters.

let's them happy.. bro... :D

Brilliant. :enjoy:

bro.. Grab a pop-corn and lets watch the one who burn it own ***... LOL
 
. .
Dude forget Jeehad or Mujaedeen, you cant sell that to any Bangladeshi politician. If we want to take the land then we need to take India in our side and invade. Proabably not too many PDF wala will agree to this but thats the only way for permanent solution. India will be more than happy to watch our back. ;)
In return we can share Sitwee and sea access with Indians.
How can you be a kafir by taking help from a dark short ugly Hindu nation? Doesn't suit tall fair handsome Mard e momin like u guys. :coffee:
 
.
GDP has no correlation with war prowess.Combined assets of Viet Cong was peanuts compared to US but they still gave US a bloody nose.Before declaring war,it is important to calculate whether country can afford it or not because war is a very costly affair.Look at US,600 billion deficit.Myanmar,being a military oriented country with nothing to lose can afford it but Bangladesh being a economic growth oriented country still trying to bring its population to the upper echelons of class may not be able to bear the brunt.
Regarding Area of Contact,you have to consider that Myanmar has a stronger Navy and your land route is densely forested thus increasing number of choke points and ambush quarters.

behind the so called Vietcong at the time is People Republic of China and Soviet Union with all of her lackeys at the times, do you think Vietnam can survive United States onslaught without armaments and soldier send to them from China and Soviet?
 
.
If a nation don't respect there citizen, how can you expect other way round????


Look at Indian foreign minister, She reply each distress call, and retrive all Indian citizen...
 
.
for all of the warmonger here, any war between Bangladesh and Myanmar will only worsened the situation there
 
.
BD has 3 times the GDP of Myanmar and this is expected to continue for the foreseeable future.

Let us say BD is only 2 times the military power of Myanmar, then it is perfectly feasible to capture bordering Rakhine which is only around 5 percent of the total land area of Myanmar. I never said anything about driving to the capital of Myanmar and capturing that.

It'd be easier to focus on our development to become stronger. And make some friends (which Hasina is lacking).

If the situation get worse in Myanmar, then it'd require a multinational response. War would be, and only be the very last option.

behind the so called Vietcong at the time is People Republic of China and Soviet Union with all of her lackeys at the times, do you think Vietnam can survive United States onslaught without armaments and soldier send to them from China and Soviet?

Having equipment is one thing, and important too! Knowing how to use them and fight, making the enemy fight on your own terms is quite another!

for all of the warmonger here, any war between Bangladesh and Myanmar will only worsened the situation there

Agreed. And Bangladesh cannot take on Myanmar alone, their military is a lot more powerful than ours. Our generals wouldn't even think about going to war with them.

But to be honest, Myanmar wouldn't gain much by pressuring Bangladesh on the Rohingya issue. The current government in Bangladesh is very powerful in the context of Bangladesh with some powerful foreign backers. It is in their interest that the ruling party remains in power. What would that leave Myanmar with in regards to their Rohingya problem? It is really not easy on Myanmar's part.
 
.
behind the so called Vietcong at the time is People Republic of China and Soviet Union with all of her lackeys at the times, do you think Vietnam can survive United States onslaught without armaments and soldier send to them from China and Soviet?
So did North Korea but of all their best efforts of a United Korea,all they could manage was a DMZ.When two huge powers are fighting a proxy war in a strategic chessboard,at the end all it comes down to the resilience and guts of the pawns.
 
.
for all of the warmonger here, any war between Bangladesh and Myanmar will only worsened the situation there

Yes & India will share the most of the burden so there will be no war besides we control the govt in BD
 
.
Rohingyas need arms. They need funds. Above all they require safe bases.
 
. .
For good side bangladesh will get back your citizens :yahoo:
For bad side the citizens will continue on poor
:disagree:
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom