What's new

Islamisation of schoolbooks in KPK

pak-marine

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 3, 2009
Messages
11,639
Reaction score
-22
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Islamisation of schoolbooks in KPK sparks debate
AFP
Published about 4 hours ago
5487daf206b23.jpg

Schoolchildren attend class at a school in Peshawar. — AFP

PESHAWAR: As teenage education activist Malala Yousafzai prepares to receive her Nobel Peace Prize, the government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa — her hometown — is pushing for Islamic content in school textbooks that critics claim promotes violent jihad.

Malala, 17, is set to be awarded for her struggle against religious extremism and for the right of children, especially girls, to an education K-P — where Taliban militants tried to kill her two years ago.

The challenge is enormous: some 25 million children aged from five to 16 in Pakistan are out of school, 14 million of them girls, according to education campaign group Alif Ailaan.

But the biggest debate surrounding education in KP is not how to improve attendance, hire more teachers or repair dilapidated infrastructure: instead, the regional government is attempting to determine how best to reclaim the curriculum in the name of Islam.

The move is being led by Jamaat-e-Islami, the junior member of the coalition led by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf (PTI).n

“There are errors in current text books which go against our values,” Inayatullah Khan, local governance minister, told AFP.

The project foresees, for example, reintroducing verses of the Koran that deal with jihad (holy war), and adding passages on the divine creation of the universe into science textbooks.

It also envisages rolling back changes made during the last period of reform, 2006, when authorities “removed religious chapters on social science texts” to replace them with “chapters on Nelson Mandela, Karl Marx, Marco Polo, Vasco de Gama and Neil Armstrong,” according to the minister.

They also want to pull primary school textbooks that depict girls without veils.

“We live in an Islamic society, women don't wear skirts here,” said Khan.

The project, confirmed by provincial education minister Atif Khan, pertains to public schools as well as those private schools which do not have the means to procure their own texts — covering the vast majority of students in the province.

Emphasis on Islam in non-religion related school texts began as early as the 1960s, but increased in the 1980s under the rule of hardline military dictator Zia-ul-Haq. The PPP and the PML-N, project a more moderate vision.

Fightback?


In response to the provincial government's plan, Sharif has launched a counter-attack by ordering the Higher Education Commission to seek changes to all texts, from primary to university level, to promote the country's “democratic” heritage over its history of coups.

The main problem however is that following recent devolution steps it is the provinces, not the central government, that have the final say on curriculum in order to cater to the region's particular cultural and linguistic values.

“There is a lot of confusion at the moment,” with some provinces refusing to allow the central government to participate in the writing of texts, explains A.H. Nayyar, an academic and leading voice for reform.

Current textbooks are already heavily criticised by liberals, who say they project a revisionist version of history that is highly nationalistic, especially over the country's rival India, while also being dismissive towards religious minorities.

Sardar Hussain Babak, a spokesman for the Awami National Party that sits in opposition in KP, blamed PTI for striking a deal with the Jamaat-i-Islami to ensure its fragile ruling coalition survived.

“There is a compromise between Tehreek-i-Insaaf and Jamaat-i-Islami. Now Jamaat-i-Islami points will be part of curriculum,” he said.

“Jamaat-i-Islami is a radical religious party which is provoking jihad, definitely now jihadi elements will be part of curriculum.”

A recent US study of 100 Pakistani school texts found that minorities — especially Hindus — were depicted as “second-class” citizens and “enemies of Islam”.

The rhetoric is even more worrying for the country's liberals than the rising number of attacks on religious minorities, saying it lays the groundwork for further radicalisation.

Even the country's Western donors, who give millions of dollars in education aid, are privately worried about the “re-Islamisation trend”.

Others see it as simply a populist move with little chance of succeeding in the short term. After the last set of reforms in 2006, authorities took seven years to print new editions, according to one Western diplomat.
 
.
So getting the Quranic verses back in the textbooks is radicalization,what a non-sense propaganda by the liberal secular scums...We are an Islamic country gained in the name of Islam and People love to practice Islam so what's the problem of liberal's,if they can't respect the majority's wish then they can go fck themselves...
 
.
So getting the Quranic verses back in the textbooks is radicalization,what a non-sense propaganda by the liberal secular scums...We are an Islamic country gained in the name of Islam and People love to practice Islam so what's the problem of liberal's,if they can't respect the majority's wish then they can go fck themselves...

Clearly cursing was a part of Islam then?

Second, throughout the history of Islam and its golden age..people like Ibn sina and Ibn Rushd... there has been a focus on keeping science and religion compartmentalized as far as their teaching went. So clearly these men who had much more intelligence than any uber idiot like Atif Khan knew that the physical and meta physical had to be kept as separate sciences. In addition, the Library of Baghdad had complete description of sciences,arts and ideas from the entire world.. for young kids to be taught absolutely separate from the curriculum.

Clearly, ignorant people like Atif Khan need to realize that when there were examples laid down 1400 years ago on when prayers, fasting and so on had to be gradually taught and enforced to a child.. then I see no reason why idiots like him have the right to enforce it.
 
.
Clearly cursing was a part of Islam then?

Second, throughout the history of Islam and its golden age..people like Ibn sina and Ibn Rushd... there has been a focus on keeping science and religion compartmentalized as far as their teaching went. So clearly these men who had much more intelligence than any uber idiot like Atif Khan knew that the physical and meta physical had to be kept as separate sciences. In addition, the Library of Baghdad had complete description of sciences,arts and ideas from the entire world.. for young kids to be taught absolutely separate from the curriculum.

Clearly, ignorant people like Atif Khan need to realize that when there were examples laid down 1400 years ago on when prayers, fasting and so on had to be gradually taught and enforced to a child.. then I see no reason why idiots like him have the right to enforce it.


Clearly sir for science we have other dedicated books in Matric course like Maths,physics,chem and bio but this is Islamiat we are talking about and if there is no Islam and Quran in Islamiat then why do even bother to keep it as a subject...
back in metric in order to understand these verses i had to start translation with tasfeer of these verses with an aalim which otherwise i would be too lazy to go for it..So tell me if teaching Quran in an Islamic country is a sin then what else do you expect..
 
.
Clearly sir for science we have other dedicated books in Matric course like Maths,physics,chem and bio but this is Islamiat we are talking about and if there is no Islam and Quran in Islamiat then why do even bother to keep it as a subject...
back in metric in order to understand these verses i had to start translation with tasfeer of these verses with an aalim which otherwise i would be too lazy to go for it..So tell me if teaching Quran in an Islamic country is a sin then what else do you expect..

But here we are not talking about Islamiyat... world history needs to be taught. The Children DO need to know about churchill, Roosevelt, Kennedy, Mandela, Mother teresa, Mao Tse Tung.. and so on.
Social sciences should not exclude these people at the expense of Islamization.

Moreover, the idea of Jihad should be introduced to a student as their struggle to prepare for exams.. not fighting and so on.
 
.
But here we are not talking about Islamiyat... world history needs to be taught. The Children DO need to know about churchill, Roosevelt, Kennedy, Mandela, Mother teresa, Mao Tse Tung.. and so on.
Social sciences should not exclude these people at the expense of Islamization.

Moreover, the idea of Jihad should be introduced to a student as their struggle to prepare for exams.. not fighting and so on.

Like i told sir,there are Urdu and English books in which a lot is taught about social sciences and various kind of personalities...the hue and cry here is about Quranic verses being introduced back in the Islamiat ,which is the reason of contention here...If some of us by any chance feel ashamed of Quranic verses because west or western minded people don't like than i am sorry should we be calling ourselves proud Muslims then??..I will leave it up to you
 
.
Like i told sir,there are Urdu and English books in which a lot is taught about social sciences and various kind of personalities...the hue and cry here is about Quranic verses being introduced back in the Islamiat ,which is the reason of contention here...If some of us by any chance feel ashamed of Quranic verses because west or western minded people don't like than i am sorry should we be calling ourselves proud Muslims then??..I will leave it up to you

you got it wrong .. its not about Islamiat but other subjects
 
. .

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom