imadul
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2007
- Messages
- 3,600
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
You haven't presented any stats about growth and progress during pmln.I don't like either but atleast PMLN has something to show for.
Do you want me to believe that PMLN which was accumulating loans well before this, and the economy did not go into such a serious crisis, but PTI comes and suddenly such a huge crisis?
Facts and Stats paint the true picture. During PMLN, the exports increased, the GDP growth increased very closely nearing target, and industrialization and infrastructure was fast being built.
What does PTI have to show for except no consistency and nearing accumulation of more loans than PMLN in such a short frame of time.
For I, NS was PM of Lahore or at best Punjab. IK is fair and not biased on regional and racial lines something a novelty in Pakistan where a big majority is bigot and deeply racist.
During NS, his sugar mills and interests groups industries prospered, there was some trickle down effect. But look at Pakistan Steel Mills and PIA. How bad agri was affected, India kept building dams on Pak upstream rivers while Kalabagh was made irrevocably controversial.