What's new

Is China trying to fan anti-India feeling in Nepal by heavily investing in projects?

manlion

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 22, 2013
Messages
7,568
Reaction score
-3
China is a step ahead of India when it comes to portraying its grip on Doklam doppelganger Dharchula, which is located in Western Nepal and acts as another tri-junction spot between India and China. China has invested a lot more than India to make a cultural impact in Nepal.

Three years ago, China overtook India as the biggest foreign direct investor in Nepal by bagging multiple hydropower projects. China has invested in as many as 125 projects of the 341 that Nepal houses in total, while India owns only 23.

At the Nepal investment Summit in March, China chipped in more than India in FDI for the Fiscal year 2017. China had been the biggest pledgers investing 8.2 billion dollars amongst the total pledges from the other seven countries that added up to 13.52 billion dollars.\

Many private Chinese businessmen moved to Nepal and have been buying and leasing properties in tourist hubs of Pokhara and Kathmandu. As many as one lakh Chinese tourists visit Pokhara alone, according to tourism office at Kaski district.

Such sound initiatives by the Chinese counterpart are bound to fan anti-India feeling amongst the Nepalese locals.

About Dharchula

The town is bifurcated across India and Nepal by the river Kali and is located at the tri junction of India, Nepal and China. Further, the bridge over the river connects Nepal to the Kumaon region in Uttarakhand. Dharchula is an important pit stop in the old Tibet-India-Nepal trade route.

This was all before China occupied Tibet in 1950. Followed by multiple democratic protests, the monarchy in Nepal fell in 2006.

Chinese invest to strengthen social ties

China has pegged some of the biggest projects, be it the construction of Pokhara International Airport or several hydroelectric projects. But many Chinese companies who had initially accepted the projects had backed out after they saw the escalating cost which prevented them from fulfilling the contractual obligation.

1503233942_pokhara-international-airport.jpg


China constructed the Pokhara International Airport in NepalCreative Commons

The Melamchi Water Supply Project – a joint venture by China Railway 15th Bureau Group and China CMIIC Engineering and Construction Corp failed after one of the guarantors said that Nepalese market was immature and the government's procurement law insisted on accepting the lowest bid.

Chinese companies have had the problem of language barrier. They have always depended on Nepalese middlemen during the bidding for the projects.

Trade and investment consultant Sanjeev Sankhya, who helps Chinese government hold negotiations with Nepal, pointed out that the Chinese are investing a lot to clear the problem of the language barrier and that they take it seriously.

China – the key for Nepal's development?

China has been infiltrating Tibetan groups in Nepal by issuing them Chinese passports and protecting them during legal dealings with Nepalese authorities.

According to a May 2017 World Bank report, the country had halved in poverty rate in 7 years and witnessed a drastic decline in income inequality.

1503233942_kathmandu-market.jpg

Kathmandu, NepalCreative Commons

The report further mentions the place has had the best monsoons in the recent years and that helped in boosting the rice production from 4.2 million tonnes a year ago to 5.2 million tonnes.

After the earthquake, the reconstruction activities have been picking up pace including substantial improvement in the tourism sector.

Recently, the Chinese government had even constructed Nepal's parliamentary arm in Kathmandu, according to a Economic Times report.

http://www.ibtimes.co.in/china-tryi...ng-nepal-by-heavily-investing-projects-739128
 
. .
We don't have to. You know why we have the problems in SCS. It's not because of some islands. Those islands were claimed in the 40s when none of these nations are even a nation yet. It was fine until 2007, what changed? I assume you know the difference between 1940 and 2007 for China and those nations.

Anyone can claim it's us, but if your friendship was ironclad, or in the US' case, so overwhelmingly powerful, there isn't anything we can do anyways.

So two options, either start handing out your lunch money or become as powerful as the US of A. Either one will solve this problem.

Either way, it's not a problem that will go away, even if China doesn't exist anymore. For there are other great powers and one super power left on this earth.
 
.
Well India is losing its influence among it's neighbors with the exception of Bhutan. :lol:

Bhutan?
Wait little and Bhutan will take a Panamanian shape:

This was last month:

Panama cuts formal ties with Taiwan in favour of China | World news ...

What China is doing to Nepal now, it did the same to Panama.

Now its Bhutan's time with lackluster army of 8K people.

Modi is trying to spread his tentacles everywhere but does not have enough money to dispense, like China.
Bihar is fooked up and Modi does not release funds, because all money has been spent on defense:

BIHAR-FLOOD_9_9_2013.jpg
 
.
Bhutan?
Wait little and Bhutan will take a Panamanian shape:

This was last month:

Panama cuts formal ties with Taiwan in favour of China | World news ...

What China is doing to Nepal now, it did the same to Panama.

Now its Bhutan's time with lackluster army of 8K people.

Modi is trying to spread his tentacles everywhere but does not have enough money to dispense, like China.
Bihar is fooked up and Modi does not release funds, because all money has been spent on defense:

BIHAR-FLOOD_9_9_2013.jpg
Bhutan will side with China eventually.
 
. . .
We don't have to. You know why we have the problems in SCS. It's not because of some islands. Those islands were claimed in the 40s when none of these nations are even a nation yet. It was fine until 2007, what changed? I assume you know the difference between 1940 and 2007 for China and those nations.

Anyone can claim it's us, but if your friendship was ironclad, or in the US' case, so overwhelmingly powerful, there isn't anything we can do anyways.

So two options, either start handing out your lunch money or become as powerful as the US of A. Either one will solve this problem.

Either way, it's not a problem that will go away, even if China doesn't exist anymore. For there are other great powers and one super power left on this earth.

How much money is China going to give Venezuela or Sri Lanka ?
 
.
Let the Nepali business grow, and our Madhesis can get the benefits too;).

I'm loving this investment game of China. Let our regions prosper more. It's good for India too, and we don't need to be part of any of China's projects but we still can reap the benefits. :enjoy:
 
. .
Let the Nepali business grow, and our Madhesis can get the benefits too;).

I'm loving this investment game of China. Let our regions prosper more. It's good for India too, and we don't need to be part of any of China's projects but we still can reap the benefits. :enjoy:

Yes, India will benefit as well eventually, but not as fast as a direct investment to next door country!
 
Last edited:
.
Some Paks and Chinese posters are patting themselves on the back on what makes the Nepal politics works always in favour of India.

The Madhesis who are pro India and 50% of Nepali population :lol: If it comes to shove they will demand a separate nation. A reason why India can never be taken out of Nepal even if CHina invests 100B$. I hope some idiots understand the cultural connections
 
.
Let the Nepali business grow, and our Madhesis can get the benefits too;).

I'm loving this investment game of China. Let our regions prosper more. It's good for India too, and we don't need to be part of any of China's projects but we still can reap the benefits. :enjoy:

No quite sure of you said when India is not invited maybe India is standing at the door beg to take the left over from China-Nepal's deal...if that you call that "reap the benefits" :rofl:

Some Paks and Chinese posters are patting themselves on the back on what makes the Nepal politics works always in favour of India.

The Madhesis who are pro India and 50% of Nepali population :lol: If it comes to shove they will demand a separate nation. A reason why India can never be taken out of Nepal even if CHina invests 100B$. I hope some idiots understand the cultural connections

you like to boast yourself, these people are second class citizen of Nepal and account only around 30%, ask for separation is ask to leave Nepal simple as that.
 
.
Communists think that the whole world is like them - without morals.

We Indians encourage Nepal to do excellent business with China. Nepal MUST use India card, get really really cheap money, if possible at ZERO interest and play the communists like a fiddle.

India - Nepal have open borders. Nepal should demand open borders between Nepal & China as well, with a small condition i.e Nepal people can go and work in China without any Visa. ;)
Nepal should take complete advantage of China in every way possible and fleece it.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom