Iranian Navy | News and Discussions

[yavar]

latest close images taken IRGC UAV & speed boat from U.S aircraft carrier and warships battle group

 

[yavar]

Iran unmanned attack boat Hits Model U S Aircraft Carrier during IRGC Naval Drill

In this video, aired by the Iranian unmanned attack boat is seen hitting a replica of a U.S. Nimitz-class aircraft carrier in the Strait of Hormuz during a drill carried out on February 25 by the IRGC navy.

 

[lonelyman]

How does it work? The crew jumps off last second? Or they go with it?

Don't be ridiculous, how you come up with that idea? You think other people's life are as cheap as Turks terrorists?

 

[Azeri440]

Iran unmanned attack boat Hits Model U S Aircraft Carrier during IRGC Naval Drill

In this video, aired by the Iranian unmanned attack boat is seen hitting a replica of a U.S. Nimitz-class aircraft carrier in the Strait of Hormuz during a drill carried out on February 25 by the IRGC navy.

you can see the source of explosion doesn't just come from the boat.
or even far too great to be caused by such a small boat in the first place.

 

[yavar]

you can see the source of explosion doesn't just come from the boat.
or even far too great to be caused by such a small boat in the first place.

can you see chicken flying in air or the source of their flying is there small wings

a it's not wise for Iran to show it's hand..

you think Iran has shown it hand ??

would be in the Hormuz Strait right??? t.

what do you think ?? you think Iran by have longer range ************
so you think iran is interested in Hormuz Strait ??
that little sh@ty water way .

Saudi Arabia is buying ballistic missiles to counter Iran threat

Hugh Tomlinsoni n Riyadh and Tom Coghlan

Last updated at 12:01AM, February 19 2015

Saudi Arabia is to expand its ballistic missile programme as it bolsters its deterrent to the threat from Iran in the covert arms race unfolding between the arch-enemies of the Gulf.

Riyadh has amassed surface-to- surface ballistic missiles and British-built cruise missiles as it seeks to counter Iran’s disputed nuclear programme.

The threat of a further escalation in the race to acquire more potent missile strike capabilities comes amid Saudi Arabia’s scepticism .



Saudi Arabia is buying ballistic missiles to counter Iran threat | The Times

ین روزنامه انگلیسی در انتهای خبر خود نوشت: تهدید رقابت تسلیحاتی در آینده داشتن قابلیت‌های قدرتمند حمله موشکی را می‌طلبد و در این زمینه گمانه زنی عربستان سعودی این است که مذاکرات
هسته‌ای بین ایران و قدرت‌های جهانی به مرحله‌ای می‌رسد که دسترسی ایران به سلاح هسته‌ای را دور می سازد و در نتیجه ایران بیش از بیش به موشک‌های متعارف قاره پیمای خود متکی خواهد شد.


تایمز انگلیس مدعی شد ریاض در پی خرید موشک‌های بالستیک برای مقابله با تهدید ایران

​

US accepts Shahab-3s in Iran’s missile arsenal, but not long-range ICBMs. Deep resentment in Jerusalem

DEBKAfile Special Report May 18, 2014, 9:16 AM (IDT)
]Two high-ranking US visitors to Israel, National Security Adviser Susan Rice and Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, publicly assured Israel this month that the Obama administration “would do what it must” to prevent Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon. Yet at the same time, the same administration informed Tehran that the demand to restrict Iran’s missile arsenal did not apply to the Shahab-3 ballistic missile, whose range of 2,100km covers any point in the Middle East, including Israel. This missile carries warheads weighing 760 kg, to 1.1 tons, which may also be nuclear.
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon challenged both Rice and Hagel on this omission. It came to light from Washington’s demand, in its direct dialogue with Tehran outside the framework of the six-power talks in Vienna, to place restrictions on Iran’s arsenal of ICBMs whose 4,000 km range places Europe and the United States at risk

The Obama administration said it was not demanding restrictions on the medium-range missiles capable “only” of striking Israel, Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf. But the comprehensive nuclear accord when it is finally negotiated must apply restrictions on the Sajjil1, Safir, Simorg (satellite launcher), Ashura1 and Ashura2 (other versions of the Sajjil class).
But this US “concession” did not placate Tehran. Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei burst out on May 11: “They expect us to limit our missile program while they constantly threaten Iran with military action. So this is a stupid idiotic expectation.” He thereupon ordered missile plants to shift to mass production.
Hagel was not just queried in Israel on this point, but also by Saudi Arabia and the Persian Persian Persian Persian Persian Persian Gulf Cooperation Council when he attended their defense ministers’ meeting in Jeddah Wednesday, May 14. Saudi Crown Prince Salman was in the chair.

When Hagel assured those present that their countries had nothing to fear from the rapprochement between Washington and Tehran, he was asked to fully explain President Obama’s policy on Iran’s missile arsenal. He replied that the plan was to establish a common anti-missile defense network for the region.

In Jerusalem, the defense secretary assured Netanyahu and Ya’alon that the close US-Israeli collaboration in maintaining one of the most sophisticated anti-missile shields in the world was sufficient security against Iranian Shahab-3 ballistic missiles.

A joint US-Israeli exercise against missile attack, Cobra Juniper, which takes place every two years, began Sunday, May 18, with the participation of 1,000 US servicemen.
However, neither Jerusalem nor the Gulf leaders accepted Washington’s explanations. Their disquiet was further exacerbated by the failure of latest round of nuclear negotiations with the six powers, which took place in Vienna Thursday, May 15, to bridge gaps between the sides and so prevented a start on the drafting of a final accord.

These widening gaps reflect the growing controversy over nuclear diplomacy in Tehran.

Saturday night, May 17, President Hassan Rouhani speaking to associates at a private meeting voiced his frustration with Khamenei: “That person thinks he knows everything and lays down policy without considering all the facts,” he complained.

Rouhani understands that tactical compromises will not bring about substantial relief from economic sanctions that at preying on his country. He is urging substantial concessions of Iran’s nuclear aspirations, enough to convince the world that his country is not after a nuclear weapon.

Khamenei and the Revolutionary Guards have rejected this approach. They are not open to real concessions either on their nuclear program or missile arsenal. This intransigence shows no sign of softening under the Obama administration’s willingness for compromise at the expense of Iran’s potential targets.
DEBKAfile, Political Analysis, Espionage, Terrorism, Security

you just don't know what our strategy could be to defeat Iran, .

no you do not know our full capabilities .
we fully aware of your strategy .
is still same strategy Ronald Reagan . U.S prepared to us nuclear weapons to keep U.S interest in persian gulf and Makran sea .
only thing which has changed is tactic . the new policy no longer relies ......................................... but it is ...............................

 

[C130]

can you see chicken flying in air or the source of their flying is there small wings


you think Iran has shown it hand ??




what do you think ?? you think Iran by have longer range ************
so you think iran is interested in Hormuz Strait ??
that little sh@ty water way .



no you do not know our full capabilities .
we fully aware of your strategy .
is still same strategy Ronald Reagan . U.S prepared to us nuclear weapons to keep U.S interest in persian gulf and Makran sea .
only thing which has changed is tactic . the new policy no longer relies ......................................... but it is ...............................

Iran is showing it's hand.
we would carpet bomb the entire Iranian coast along the Hormuz before letting a CBG be attacked.

and no we wouldn't use nukes unless Iran used them first.

 

[-SINAN-]

Iran is showing it's hand. I think would would carpet bomb the entire Iranian coast along the Hormuz.

and no we wouldn't use nukes unless Iran used them first.

Be sure to not park your AC 2 km away from the coast. It's paint can be scratched.

 

[mohsen]

Be sure to not park your AC 2 km away from the coast. It's paint can be scratched.

we have Qadr-F antiship ballistic missile with 2000km range, so:
2km or 2000km, no difference.

 

[Arminkh]

you can see the source of explosion doesn't just come from the boat.
or even far too great to be caused by such a small boat in the first place.

Maybe not possible with the explosives that you know about. Have you heard about Octanitrocubane? For now it is being made in lab scale and has twice the power of TNT. A small boat like that can easily carry 300kg of warhead. Use the above and it is as if it is carrying 600 kg TNT which is the same as the warhead of Khalije Fars ASBM which is fully capable of producing an explosion like that.

Iran claimed almost 15 years ago that it has come up with a new explosive that is far stronger than any other non-atomic explosives used to that date. There was an incident in in small city in Khorasan when a train carrying military material derailed and one of the containers exploded. Almost the whole city was flattened and explosion was heard in Mashad which was 75 km away and behind mountains and Tehran University seismic department almost 600 km away recorded a 3.6 Richter earthquake! The army never announced what was in that container but as soon as the train derailed, they started evacuating the whole city. They knew what was coming.

Don't reject things based on your knowledge, No country ever reveals the details of the warfare it has.

 

[Azeri440]

Maybe not possible with the explosives that you know about. Have you heard about Octanitrocubane? For now it is being made in lab scale and has twice the power of TNT. A small boat like that can easily carry 300kg of warhead. Use the above and it is as if it is carrying 600 kg TNT which is the same as the warhead of Khalije Fars ASBM which is fully capable of producing an explosion like that.

Iran claimed almost 15 years ago that it has come up with a new explosive that is far stronger than any other non-atomic explosives used to that date. There was an incident in in small city in Khorasan when a train carrying military material derailed and one of the containers exploded. Almost the whole city was flattened and explosion was heard in Mashad which was 75 km away and behind mountains and Tehran University seismic department almost 600 km away recorded a 3.6 Richter earthquake! The army never announced what was in that container but as soon as the train derailed, they started evacuating the whole city. They knew what was coming.

Don't reject things based on your knowledge, No country ever reveals the details of the warfare it has.

I don't think you understand what source of explosion means , if you look the source of explosion was spread out across the mock aircraft carrier and not focused on one point.

 

[Arminkh]

I don't think you understand what source of explosion means , if you look the source of explosion was spread out across the mock aircraft carrier and not focused on one point.

My comment was to answer your doubt about how much explosive power a boat like that can carry. So don't mix the two.

When you have a continues steel wall on one side and the ship's deck extending above the explosion, you will have the explosion wave spread along the hull. Explosion is simply an expanding wave of hot gas. It will take the shape of the environment around it. As an extreme example suppose you have an explosion inside a tunnel. The shock wave will mostly expand along the tunnel and if it can open up a route in the tunnel wall it will go through that too.

 

[mister]

shahed 129:

 

[mister]

zelzal rocket:

 

[mister]

suicide boat:

 

[Arminkh]

shahed 129:

Are those Sadid missiles?