What's new

India’s river-linking worrying, says Bangladesh watchdog

Rahul9090

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Feb 21, 2014
Messages
966
Reaction score
-1
Country
India
Location
India
The Parliamentary Committee on the Ministry of Water Resources also decided at a meeting on Wednesday to seek details of the project from India.

After the meeting, committee Chairman Ramesh Chandra Sen told reporters: “Allocation of fund afresh for the project is a matter of concern for us. We’ll ask the water resources ministry to gather information from India through the foreign ministry.”

The new BJP government, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, on July 10 allocated 1 billion rupees in his maiden budget for the project initiated by the previous BJP-led NDA government, headed by Atal Bihari Vajpayee, in 1998.

The succeeding Congress-led UPA government could not carry the project forward due to stiff opposition from environmentalist groups, but the Supreme Court, in Feb, 2012, ruled that the government could proceed.

The project is aimed at diverting the waters of some of the common rivers to India’s drought-hit regions by linking them with canals.

Dhaka fears such diversions will affect the flow of the rivers in Bangladesh.

While speaking to reporters, Sen expressed the committee’s dissatisfaction with the progress of river-dredging projects.

He said members of the committee had been to various projects undertaken by the Water Development Board in Kushtia, Jessore, Satkhira, Khulna and Bagerhat and found they were not being ‘properly’ implemented.

“The work could not be done properly because of the violent political programmes of BNP and Jamaat (-e-Islami)'” the committee chief said.

He also cited financial constraints, adding that the committee had advised the completion of the more important projects first.

The committee has suggested construction of 20 kilometres embankments.

Sen said: “Water flow from India increases during the monsoon. That’s why we need to construct 40 kilometres of protective walls. Construction of 20 kilometres has been suggested this year.




India’s river-linking worrying, says Bangladesh watchdog -
bdnews24.com
 
. . . .
These idiots or so called water specialists from India will be content only after bringing a catastrophe to this region!
What fucking catastrophe? Do u even understand facts? Do u guyz ever think innovatively rather than only crying all da tym?

Who stopped u from modernizing ur rivers? who asked u to not build Dams for storing water. Who asked u to not embank ur water streams?

Karna dharna kuchh nahi. Baithe baithe free mein rotiyan todni hain.
 
.
What fucking catastrophe? Do u even understand facts? Do u guyz ever think innovatively rather than only crying all da tym?
Who stopped u from modernizing ur rivers? who asked u to not build Dams for storing water. Who asked u to not embank ur water streams?

Yeah I understand it, even your own Indian environmentalists have warned against such insane project.

It's not about building dams or embanking the water streams, you are thinking of changing the entire course of major rivers that too illegally, against the international norms. The result would be disastrous, no less than a catastrophe for the entire region.
 
.
Yeah I understand it, even your own Indian environmentalists have warned against such insane project.

It's not about building dams or embanking the water streams, you are thinking of changing the entire course of major rivers that too illegally, against the international norms. The result would be disastrous, no less than a catastrophe for the entire region.
Since we are talking about legality and international norms, can you provide a link regarding the same.
 
.
Since we are talking about legality and international norms, can you provide a link regarding the same.

22nd March - World Water Day 2009

"The primary substantive rules of international law is that States must utilize their international watercourses in an equitable and reasonable way and without causing significant harm to their neighbors."

 
.
22nd March - World Water Day 2009

"The primary substantive rules of international law is that States must utilize their international watercourses in an equitable and reasonable way and without causing significant harm to their neighbors."
I think GOI will take international water laws into consideration before taking this endeavor, they don't want the Kishanganga episode all over again.
 
.
I think GOI will take international water laws into consideration before taking this endeavor

Doesn't seem so. Since Bangladesh has already showed its concerns regarding the project, Indian government should have invited the Bangladeshi specialists and held discussions or consulted with Bangladesh government to remove the suspicion, but it didn't.
 
.
Oo
What fucking catastrophe? Do u even understand facts? Do u guyz ever think innovatively rather than only crying all da tym?

Who stopped u from modernizing ur rivers? who asked u to not build Dams for storing water. Who asked u to not embank ur water streams?

Karna dharna kuchh nahi. Baithe baithe free mein rotiyan todni hain.
Ooookies,do remember the same about Brahmaputra, the Chinese are then definitely doing something right. Right?
 
.
Oo

Ooookies,do remember the same about Brahmaputra, the Chinese are then definitely doing something right. Right?
That we will take care. Dont cry unnecessarily. We are taking care of our Brahmaputra and for that purpose we have Bhutan.
 
.
Doesn't seem so. Since Bangladesh has already showed its concerns regarding the project, Indian government should have invited the Bangladeshi specialists and held discussions or consulted with Bangladesh government to remove the suspicion, but it didn't.
Even during the Kisanganga project, pakistani specialists were not invited but the decisions were taken according to international law. This can form the basis of all the future construction projects undertaken on rivers shared by neighboring countries.
ICA gives go ahead to Kishenganga project - The Hindu
 
.
Even during the Kisanganga project, pakistani specialists were not invited but the decisions were taken according to international law. This can form the basis of all the future construction projects undertaken on rivers shared by neighboring countries.
ICA gives go ahead to Kishenganga project - The Hindu

I'm not sure if you could relate the river linking project with the Kishenganga dispute. Building a dam for hydro-electric plant means you are temporarily halting the water flow while the river linking project includes changing the course and the diversion of major international rivers permanently which would surely harm the lower riparian countries.
 
.
I'm not sure if you could relate the river linking project with the Kishenganga dispute. Building a dam for hydro-electric plant means you are temporarily halting the water flow while the river linking project includes changing the course and the diversion of major international rivers permanently which would surely harm the lower riparian countries.
Its not permanently diverted, they build gates over the mouth of the diversion, which controls the flow of water. Almost all of these rivers are diverted to drought affected areas. In rainy season, when there is excess of water, which even cause devastating floods even in your country, will be diverted and during summer the gates will be closed. Don't you think this will be win win for both the countries. You will also save millions if not billions of infrastructure damage.
And in return we will bring our dry areas under irrigation and generate a little bit of electricity where it is possible.

The South–North Water Transfer Project over Yangtze River (my city is based on its bank, so a special bond)
AJ-dualtunnel-IMG_3363_590X250.jpg

These are the gates i'm talking about.
Water Transfer Project 4.jpg

The Periyar Project joining periyar river in kerala to Vaigai in Tamil Nadu.
VBKN1-MADURAI_10595f.jpg
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom