What's new

India’s first homemade aircraft carrier falls short of US expectations

Saifullah Sani

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Apr 15, 2011
Messages
3,339
Reaction score
2
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
The US has agreed to sell New Delhi everything from attack helicopters to artillery. (AP Photo)
india-navy-759.jpg


India’s first locally made aircraft carrier has been found to be non-operational by American naval engineers, according to a report in Wall Street Journal.

The report states that the engineers who inspected the carrier at the port of Kochi in February, expecting it to be battle-ready, said it wouldn’t be operational for up to a decade. They found it having shortcomings like no small missile system to defend itself, a limited ability to launch sorties and no defined strategy for how to use the ship in combat.

India and US have joined hands to counter China’s expanding sway in the Indian ocean.

“China’s navy will be the biggest in the world soon, and they’re definitely eyeing the Indian Ocean with ports planned in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh,” retired Admiral Arun Prakash, the former commander of India’s navy, is quoted as saying in the report.

The inspection formed part of US plans to share aircraft carrier technology with India. In August, both the countries had signed a military agreement sharing logistics. They also plan a joint participation in naval exercises with Japan. Washington has approved proposals by Lockheed Martin and Boeing Co. to make advanced jet fighters in India.

India and US naval agreement has given way to new dynamics to Asia’s geopolitical terrain, with China having diplomatic issues with the joint exercises.

Indian Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar recently reiterated a commitment to indigenous manufacturing, citing concerns that foreign supply of arms and ammunition could be cut off in a time of war. “I think self-dependence is very important,” he said.

China has been speeding up efforts on expanding its military forces. China is strategically investing in ports circling the Indian Ocean in Sri Lanka, Myanmar and Pakistan. It is also building it’s first overseas military outpost in Dijboputi.

India had pledged funding for a new port in Iran last year. It has also added two Indian- built carriers to the Russian one it now operates.

US, however, is showing concerns about India’s military strategy. Experts said there have been severe delays on the part of New Delhi in modernising its carriers, jet fighters and nuclear submarines.

Some serious faults have been found in India’s first homemade carrier, INS Vikrant. Its gearboxes, construction, design and jet launching system has fallen short of expectations. But the US Navy has hopes on India’s second homemade carrier which promises advance technologies.

http://indianexpress.com/article/in...rrier-not-enough-to-fight-china-seas-4404232/
 
The US has agreed to sell New Delhi everything from attack helicopters to artillery. (AP Photo)
india-navy-759.jpg


India’s first locally made aircraft carrier has been found to be non-operational by American naval engineers, according to a report in Wall Street Journal.

The report states that the engineers who inspected the carrier at the port of Kochi in February, expecting it to be battle-ready, said it wouldn’t be operational for up to a decade. They found it having shortcomings like no small missile system to defend itself, a limited ability to launch sorties and no defined strategy for how to use the ship in combat.

India and US have joined hands to counter China’s expanding sway in the Indian ocean.

“China’s navy will be the biggest in the world soon, and they’re definitely eyeing the Indian Ocean with ports planned in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh,” retired Admiral Arun Prakash, the former commander of India’s navy, is quoted as saying in the report.

The inspection formed part of US plans to share aircraft carrier technology with India. In August, both the countries had signed a military agreement sharing logistics. They also plan a joint participation in naval exercises with Japan. Washington has approved proposals by Lockheed Martin and Boeing Co. to make advanced jet fighters in India.

India and US naval agreement has given way to new dynamics to Asia’s geopolitical terrain, with China having diplomatic issues with the joint exercises.

Indian Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar recently reiterated a commitment to indigenous manufacturing, citing concerns that foreign supply of arms and ammunition could be cut off in a time of war. “I think self-dependence is very important,” he said.

China has been speeding up efforts on expanding its military forces. China is strategically investing in ports circling the Indian Ocean in Sri Lanka, Myanmar and Pakistan. It is also building it’s first overseas military outpost in Dijboputi.

India had pledged funding for a new port in Iran last year. It has also added two Indian- built carriers to the Russian one it now operates.

US, however, is showing concerns about India’s military strategy. Experts said there have been severe delays on the part of New Delhi in modernising its carriers, jet fighters and nuclear submarines.

Some serious faults have been found in India’s first homemade carrier, INS Vikrant. Its gearboxes, construction, design and jet launching system has fallen short of expectations. But the US Navy has hopes on India’s second homemade carrier which promises advance technologies.

http://indianexpress.com/article/in...rrier-not-enough-to-fight-china-seas-4404232/

Rectify as much short comings as you can if they are really short comings. We can take rcare of it in second career.
 
Us have no experience in STOBAR carriers and they are rating us???
 
Us have no experience in STOBAR carriers and they are rating us???
I don't know why we are not ready face criticism? You can't undermine US navy by for not using STOBAR. They are the pioneers in carrier based naval ops in the world. If they said something negative on our carrier means,there must be some of course and we should rectify the same instead of bashing whistle blowers.
 
Problems might be real. Lets hope our engineers will short these things up at earliest.
 
That would be too costly, and unlike our neighbours we are too proud to beg in front of the super powers.

India certainly continues to receive massive aid from many places. As for begging, you are the one a Pakistani forum begging us to be convinced. It is not the other way round. We refuse to be convinced. Now, do something about it if you can cow dung sniffer.
 
Concerning is modernizing the carrier hint hint (replace AK 630 CIWS with US system Phalanx, replace BARAK with US defence system and the MIG 29 with F/A18) basically they are pitching to have their system installed because they wanted this done earlier. They had earlier pitched us a bundle deal for the EMALS and F/A18 or F35. Which we didn't take because we were already interested in Rafale and MIG due to commonality with Air Force.
 
I don't know why we are not ready face criticism? You can't undermine US navy by for not using STOBAR. They are the pioneers in carrier based naval ops in the world. If they said something negative on our carrier means,there must be some of course and we should rectify the same instead of bashing whistle blowers.

What if they are just talking shit in order to get you to buy more of their stuff?
 
Concerning is modernizing the carrier hint hint (replace AK 630 CIWS with US system Phalanx, replace BARAK with US defence system and the MIG 29 with F/A18) basically they are pitching to have their system installed because they wanted this done earlier. They had earlier pitched us a bundle deal for the EMALS and F/A18 or F35. Which we didn't take because we were already interested in Rafale and MIG due to commonality with Air Force.

EMALS, talks of F35 etc are for IAC-2. IAC-1 is nearing completion, and it is too late for anybody to pitch in anything.

I'm not really sure what this report is about.
 
EMALS, talks of F35 etc are for IAC-2. IAC-1 is nearing completion, and it is too late for anybody to pitch in anything.

I'm not really sure what this report is about.
It's not just EMALS they were pitching F/A18 for the new carrier and had performed test to validate that it can fly from STOBAR but India went with MIG, also there is a replacement competition going on for the CIWS system mainly the AK630 which they were interested in. Then there also the missile defense system that was offered which was not consider because we're working with Israel on the Barak system.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom