What's new

Indians Maligning Malala - After she showed her support for Kashmiri people

This article is not even from any mainstream Indian media outlet. Of course, she will talk about peace. And good if she is. Even the crazy Shiv Sena said they would welcome Malala to India. It's ok to toe the Pakistani line on Kashmir if you are a Pakistani citizen - why are Pakistanis so shocked that she backs Pakistan's stance on Kashmir?
 
.
Pakistani politics is a dirty business, so if she ever reads this, I would suggest that she stay as far away as possible. Her best role is spreading the good will of Pakistani people, and she can do so much more within that role.

on second thought you need good people on politics. i do not know if she is cut out for politics.
 
. .
on second thought you need good people on politics. i do not know if she is cut out for politics.
Well, at leats no until she's old enough. I can actually see her becoming a good future PM for Pakistan, but that is something I fear may destroy her.
 
. .
Really? a website of obscure bloggers?

A leopard never changes its spots

Malala Yousufzai , in an interview to the Pakistani daily Dawn, has called upon the United Nations and international community to put an end to the “atrocities on Kashmiri people in Indian held Kashmir”.

As per reports:-

“The people in Kashmir, like people everywhere, deserve their fundamental human rights… They should live free of fear and repression,” Malala said.
“I call on the United Nations, the international community and India and Pakistan to work together with utmost urgency to right these wrongs, providing the people of Kashmir with the dignity, respect and freedom they deserve,”Dawn quoted her as saying


Malala said that due to the weeks-long curfew imposed in Kashmir “many schools have been closed… keeping children away from their classrooms.”
“I stand with the people of Kashmir. My 14 million Kashmiri sisters and brothers have always been close to my heart,” she said.

She proves all along what any person with a sane brain who looked beyond the propaganda knew:- She’s a pawn for both the west and global jihad whitewashing lobby, and a pathetic one that too.

Has this hypocrite ever cared to even utter a word about the atrocities of the Pakistan army on Balochistan, where 25000 have disappeared in less than ten years

(official figure), chemical weapons have been used and women have been dragged to rape camps? Or about the hundreds of Yazidi girl taken as sex slaves by Daesh? Or on about the atrocities in Pakistani Kashmir? On the atrocities on Shias and Ahmedis in Pakistan? Or on the acid attacks epidemic in Pakistan? Or the blatant human rights violations sponsored by Saudi Arabia which includes public beheadings and women being whipped for being raped?. I wont expect her to speak on the atrocities on Pakistani/Bangladeshi Hindus or Kashmiri pandits because for her they will be persona non grata, but she’s done nothing more than parrot the same lies (Terrorism is because of poverty and discrimination, education will make it vanish) which the leftist controlled media spreads on a daily basis.
Maybe an injury to the frontal lobe of the brain due to the bullet has made her vegetative to the wrongs in her own land. But then, that 0.22 bullet in her head by some Taliban moron who didn’t know how to do his work properly is her claim to fame. Her daddy must be thanking Allah for that bullet in her head, which fortunately for him, has made him the master of millions of dollars, never having to work again in his life.

So the Taliban tried to kill her in 2012 to dissuade girls from going to school. She survived this, and awoke as a media celebrity. She was carried to London for further treatment, and post that was awarded the Nobel Peace prize two years later. Malala said in her speech how the biggest thing terrorists are scared of girls with books and how education is the key and how she is not afraid of Taliban. She’s is so not afraid of the Taliban that she has never went back to Pakistan (SWAT valley) again, choosing instead, to show her so called bravery and wisdom from the safe confines of her country of refuge.Its ironical that the person who escaped from her country is trying to defend the same and trying to preach humanity to India. And on top of that, making statements that Pakistan is a safe country and cricket teams can visit there. If it is that safe, why is she holed up in London?

READ No one killed Lal Bahadur Shastri
Nobel prizes for sciences are credible, but that for economics and peace are nothing but a political tool. Nobel prize for peace or economics is nothing but a medium to forward a set agenda, plant a personality to serve The west and the international community have found a very nice figure in her to advertise their holier than thou image and tokenism that masquerades as solution. Ironically, in her Nobel acceptance speech, she cited “Shaheed” Benazir Bhutto, the person who hoarsely shouted jihadi rhetoric just like her father and who was killed by one of the bombs she distributed to be used across the border. Irony is a very small word to describe this.

Nobel prize for peace in 2014 was awarded to Malala Yousufzai from Pakistan (so that the western elite can congratulate itself as if they have saved all women living under Taliban ) and Kailash Satyarthi from India (so that the white man’s burden & ‘atrocity ****’ can be justified again, because the horrible land of India doesn’t care about its children and hence the west must). It doesn’t matter that he too, has questionable credentials.

The global media has made her into a goddess like figure, made us believe that this pea brain is fighting global jihad with a pen and paper. No she isn’t, she’s just parroting carefully coached lines like the only cure for terrorism is education (conveniently ignoring that Osama bin Laden was an engineer and Ayman al Zawahiri a surgeon, for example), speaking about “women empowerment” (but never once mentioning 300 plus schoolgirls captured by Boko Haram as sex slaves or how women are second class citizens in Saudi Arabia, not allowed to even walk in public alone, and caned for driving) and so on. The fact remains that she didn’t “win” , like the media has us believe. She did not fight the sword with the pen, she just went to some other place where no bullet will reach her. While there are plenty of examples of revolutionaries and reformers fighting from distant lands for their country, one cannot compare this midget with them, no matter how much the media lionizes her. No one wins or becomes a revolutionary by running away and paying lip service to a supposedly beloved cause from the comfort of a safe haven.

READ The Plight of Jammu
The winner here are the terrorists (who must be laughing at her lofty and misleading speeches lapped up by useful idiots around the world). And Malala and the western elite(Because all she has done after waking up from the hospital table is travel the largely western world on funded trips, peddling feminist dogma, liberal lies and her book, making the globalists and liberals feel good about themselves).

The loser here is millions of girls of Pakistan or other Islamic countries for whom things have not changed at all, because lofty words in scripted talk shows and self validating award ceremonies do not change anything. All those girls whom she claims to represent but no longer does will continue living under fear, open to pedophilia or honor killings which continue being a part of glorious sharia ruled societies.

Malala has not gone back to Pakistan. She was shot in the head, and she fled. The terrorists won, no other girl will dare to defy them. That’s a fact, which cannot be changed by any amount of desktop wallpapers or international prizes. She lives in London, hogs the limelight and now as per reports, is paid upwards of USD 1000000 for appearing on any show, telling the audiences of how bullets can be silenced by books (one child, one teacher, one book can change the world) , all the while when bullet in the head is the most humane treatment girls speaking out in Taliban or Islamic state controlled areas. The west will keep funding her and stroking her ego, while funding wars and the same Islamic groups that have made the world a bad place at the same time.

As for us foolish Indians, let us stop worshiping just about any token figure that gets honored by the western elite, and stop embracing our killers from across the borders. There are a lot of people who have been killed for fighting injustice, and as per this logic they all deserve the Nobel peace prize. But good intentions hardly fit the agenda and controlled narrative. That’s why we will always see poster boys and girls being honored, and real heroes remain unsung.

http://www.thefrustratedindian.com/2016/09/malala-kashmir-atrocities/
@Zibago @django @Pakistani Exile @Irfan Baloch

What else do.you expect from Indians
Indians? So likes of your laal topi represents all Pakistanis? Please evaluate the source material before you make such sweeping statements.
 
.
Be careful, there are still Pakistanis on the forum that consider Malala to be a RAW/CIA/Israeli agent.

Not anymore ..now that she has spoken out against India, thos key board warriors can rest finally in peace
 
.
The reason Malala has not spoken against the so called atrocities in Baluchistan because their are NO atrocities to speak out against, they are the figment of the imagination of Maroof Raza , Tarek Fateh and Arnab Goswami. Their are operations against miscreants who are backed and trained by India (proof Kuldashan Yadav), these counter-terror operations are carried out by patriotic and disciplined men who are trained to an extremely high level.
Malala has spoken out against the atrocities perpetrated against Yazidi girls on numerous occasions and she has spoken out against the brutal Indian actions in illegally occupied kashmir territory and it is illegally occupied as this Indian constitutional document is very clear J and K is not a part of India https://www.oecd.org/site/adboecdanti-corruptioninitiative/46814358.pdf see page 6 . @Shamain ;) .
In regards to why she does not speak out against the non-existent atrocities in AK , well I can assure you Indian folk as a resident of AK, AK is like Shangrilla.Kudos
@Joe Shearer
@PaklovesTurkiye
@Moonlight
@The Sandman
@Zibago

Please re-consider your post for these reasons:
  1. Malala has a perfect right to her opinion and to express it, just as much as any Indian has, or anybody else in the whole wide world. She should not be disadvantaged by her position as a famous victim of bigotry, any more than she should be advantaged. We have to accept her right to speak on the subject; we do not have to agree with her, in supporting her freedom of speech.
  2. If we react to her statements, that is only appropriate. She makes statements in the hope that people will react to them; she hopes that they will react in the way desired, but if it otherwise, at least people will have left behind their apathy.
  3. The point about the constitutional document proving that J&K is not part of India is not at all clear. It is thought-provoking that on a subject as discussed threadbare as this, one can be so naive and ill-read as not to know the precise and specific reason why the wording used is the way it is.
 
.
Please re-consider your post for these reasons:
  1. Malala has a perfect right to her opinion and to express it, just as much as any Indian has, or anybody else in the whole wide world. She should not be disadvantaged by her position as a famous victim of bigotry, any more than she should be advantaged. We have to accept her right to speak on the subject; we do not have to agree with her, in supporting her freedom of speech.
  2. If we react to her statements, that is only appropriate. She makes statements in the hope that people will react to them; she hopes that they will react in the way desired, but if it otherwise, at least people will have left behind their apathy.
  3. The point about the constitutional document proving that J&K is not part of India is not at all clear. It is thought-provoking that on a subject as discussed threadbare as this, one can be so naive and ill-read as not to know the precise and specific reason why the wording used is the way it is.

Welcome back....Welcome back.....Welcome back......:wave: :)
 
. . .
  1. The point about the constitutional document proving that J&K is not part of India is not at all clear. It is thought-provoking that on a subject as discussed threadbare as this, one can be so naive and ill-read as not to know the precise and specific reason why the wording used is the way it is.
Naive.....hahahha.....you wish. The document is clear and you know it.
 
. . .
Doesnt the Statement of hers include the People in Azad Kashmir as well? Or is it just same old hypocrisy?
Anyway I find it even amusing now the other side has gone to a level that they need all the support they can get on Kashmir, even from a kid. Seriously!
 
.
Back
Top Bottom