What's new

Indian tribals reject Maoists, and Delhi

Pakchina

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Dec 12, 2010
Messages
643
Reaction score
0
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Asia Times Online By Sudha Ramachandran



"BANGALORE - In at least two instances over the past fortnight, tribal communities in Maoist strongholds on the east coast of India have stood up to rebel diktats.

Security officials are interpreting these acts of defiance as a turning point in ongoing anti-Maoist operations, indicating dwindling tribal support for the rebels in the state of Odisha, known as Orissa until last month.

Odisha's southern districts have large tribal populations living in conditions of abysmal poverty. Koraput district's immense mineral wealth has impoverished tribal communities as mining companies have displaced thousands from their lands. Tribals in neighboring
Malkangiri district have been repeatedly displaced by the Balimela hydroelectric power project.

Anger over widespread displacement, lack of basic amenities and poverty in southern Odisha has driven hundreds of tribal youth to join the Maoists, prompting security analysts to describe these districts and entire villages as "pro-Maoist".

Several local government bodies in Nabarangpur district, which borders Koraput, and Bastar and Kanker districts in Chhattisgarh - the epicenter of India's Maoist conflict - are controlled by the Maoists and rarely have the locals defied the rebels.

But the Maoist hold over the region appears to be weakening.

Recent by-elections in the tribal-dominated Umarkote constituency in Nabrangpur district saw voters turn up in large numbers in defiance of a Maoist call to boycott the poll. Over 72% of voters in Umarkote participated, a turnout far higher than the national average and particularly in insurgency-wracked areas.

The by-election was necessitated by the assassination in September of Jagabandhu Majhi, a wheelchair-bound 39-year-old legislator representing Umarkote in the Odisha state assembly, by suspected Maoist assailants.

Around the same time as the vote, the Maoists had called for a bandh (shut-down strike) to protest the killing of their leader Kishenji in an alleged fake encounter in West Bengal's Jangalmahal area. (See Delhi provokes Maoists with leader's killing, Asia Times Online, Nov 29, 2011) It evoked a lukewarm response in Maoist areas in Odisha.

According to a report in the Deccan Herald, a large number of tribal children in the Maoist stronghold of Malkangiri were seen walking to schools, defying the rebels' bandh call. In Nuapara, another district hit by Maoist violence, tribals were seen clearing tree branches that Maoists had placed across roads to block traffic.

"Never before have the tribals of the [Malkangiri] district sent their children to the schools during a Maoist bandh," the Deccan Herald observed, adding that this was the first time too that locals dared to remove by themselves a road blockade set up by the Maoists, rather than wait as in the past for the police to clear such blockades.

"The recent defiance of the Maoists indicates a change in the local mood," an official in the Special Operations Group (SOG), a counter-insurgency force, told Asia Times Online. Tribal communities are fed up of the Maoists, their intimidation and violence. They resent their children being forced to join the Maoists, he said.

It is two years since the Indian government launched Operation Green Hunt, a massive, coordinated military operation to clear states in eastern India of Maoists. Operation Green Hunt has "succeeded in not only eliminating several Maoist leaders and fighters but also it has turned more and more villagers in former Maoist strongholds against the Maoists," the SOG official said. Villagers are coming to the security forces with information identifying Maoists and their hideouts.

The local population rejecting insurgents' demands suggests an important turning point in counter-insurgency operations. However, it might be a bit early for Indian security forces to start celebrating the changing tide.

Operation Green Hunt may have weakened the Maoists militarily and eroded their support base somewhat but it has not translated into support for the government. Villagers have suffered grievously because of the military operations. Their huts have been burnt down and their children taken away by paramilitary personnel on suspicion of being Maoists or their sympathizers. It has deepened their anger with the state.

What has changed however is that they do not see the Maoists as their saviors as they did in the past. The Maoists melted into the forests when Operation Green Hunt was launched in a village, leaving the villagers to bear the brunt of the offensive. That appears to have dampened tribal sympathy for the Maoists.

However, not everyone is convinced of the change in mood among the tribals. The high voter turnout in the Umarkote election was not down to new-found faith among tribals in the democratic process but the power of money, a social activist said. As Odishabarta's correspondent Basant Rath puts it, "Vitamin M", or money and muscle power "played a crucial role" in the entire election process. It is likely to have brought the voters to the polling booths in large numbers.

Those who see tribal assertion against the Maoists as a new development are wrong, the activist said, arguing that tribals have always spoken up when they needed to.

Indeed, in February when the Maoists abducted Malkangiri district collector R Vineel Krishna and junior engineer Pabitra Mohan Majhi, tribals in Malkangiri and Koraput protested against the Maoists. Krishna, a young bureaucrat, had done commendable work for tribals in the Chitrakonda area.

The media and the government tends to frame the Maoist conflict in black and white, as though all tribals in Maoist strongholds are Maoists or sympathizers. They have failed to draw attention to the large number of tribals, indeed the majority, who are involved in non-violent mass agitation to articulate their grievances.

To get back their land that has been illegally grabbed by non-tribal landlords or to resist the takeover of their lands by private and government-owned mining companies, thousands of tribals have come together in mass organizations such as the Niyamgiri Suraksha Samiti, the Mali Parbat Surakshya Samiti and the Malkangiri Zilla Adivasi Sangha (MZAS). Unlike the Maoists who are looking at capturing state power through armed struggle, these organizations have limited goals - they want an end to dispossession of tribals of their land.

The organizations have a complex relationship with the Maoists. They benefit from the backing the Maoists extend them as fear of the Maoists' guns compels their exploiters to take them more seriously. But they suffer too because of this as the police brand them as 'Maoist fronts' and crack down on their members. The Maoists extension of support to tribal causes, their issuing of threats to liquor mafias or moneylenders who exploit the tribals is tactical, prompted by a need for local tribal support to be able to function in the forests.

In contrast to the government's blanket branding of tribals as pro-Maoist, the co-existence of the two has not always been comfortable. There are sharp, even serious differences between tribal political activists and the Maoists, and neither is comfortable with the entry of the other into its turf. An MZAS leader in Tarlakota village in Malkangiri told Asia Times Online two years ago that the Maoist presence in the villages hinders work as it attracts the security forces, who then harass MZAS activists and other villagers. As for the Maoists, they do not want MZAS activists to work in rebel strongholds, he said.

Refusal to see the complexity of the tribal relationship with the Maoists has resulted in the security forces burning down entire villages in Maoist strongholds, rounding up all youth in these areas on the suspicion that they are Maoists.

It is this refusal that will stand in the way of tribal weariness with Maoists evolving into support for the state."

Asia Times Online :: Indian tribals reject Maoists, and Delhi
 
.
Great news. Finally tribals are beginning understand what Maoists really are. Best way to forward to them is shun these pests and join the national mainstream. This way Maoists & their ideology will be history very soon
 
.
Indian Tribals are in someway impossible to deal with. They want development, but not ready to make the sacrifices.
 
.
I am from Odisha, and that too from Koraput, which most describe as the epicenter of maoist movement. I can tell you that most tribals don't even know or bother about the maoists or thier ideologies, neither have I ever seen any maoist entering my village...and I just stay 20 KM away from Dantewada. The so called 'maoist movement' is just blown out of proportions
 
.
Indian Tribals are in someway impossible to deal with. They want development, but not ready to make the sacrifices.

You don't have an iota of knowledge about tribals. I grew amongst them. They are much more civilized then you can ever think and they are very reasonable; however, governments after governments have deprived them of development. You come to either chhattisgarh or Koraput, you will know how deprived they are
 
.
You don't have an iota of knowledge about tribals. I grew amongst them. They are much more civilized then you can ever think and they are very reasonable; however, governments after governments have deprived them of development. You come to either chhattisgarh or Koraput, you will know how deprived they are

Dude, welcome to reality..India is not a land of milk and honey. We are a country with limited resources and unlimited needs. Govt has their priorities. GoI cannot overlook the needs of urban areas especially the cities in favor of backward areas, as the former is the principal wealth generators. Thats is the case of every other country. So there will be a time lapse until development reaches every nook and corner of the country. It has nothing to do with Govt apathy towards any group.
 
.
Dude, welcome to reality..India is not a land of milk and honey. We are a country with limited resources and unlimited needs. Govt has their priorities. GoI cannot overlook the needs of urban areas especially the cities in favor of backward areas, as the former is the principal wealth generators. Thats is the case of every other country. So there will be a time lapse until development reaches every nook and corner of the country. It has nothing to do with Govt apathy towards any group.

Neither anyone here complaining about tribals not getting any development nor the need to overlook urban areas in favor of backward areas. My responses was to you assertion that “Indian Tribals are in someway impossible to deal with. They want development, but not ready to make the sacrifices”. .
 
.
Neither anyone here complaining about tribals not getting any development nor the need to overlook urban areas in favor of backward areas. My responses was to you assertion that “Indian Tribals are in someway impossible to deal with. They want development, but not ready to make the sacrifices”. .

I was commenting on the various incidents in which Tribals are protesting against the mining projects which is essential for the development of the nation as a whole and FYI my family gave up land in city (which is very expensive) for the expansion of the airport. So I know a thing or two about 'sacrifice for the development of the nation'.
 
.
I was commenting on the various incidents in which Tribals are protesting against the mining projects which is essential for the development of the nation as a whole and FYI my family gave up land in city (which is very expensive) for the expansion of the airport. So I know a thing or two about 'sacrifice for the development of the nation'.

People are different and are individuals. Some like to 'sacrifice' for the nation some don't. It depends on the individuals and nothing to do with whether a person is a tribal or non tribal.
 
.
People are different and are individuals. Some like to 'sacrifice' for the nation some don't. It depends on the individuals and nothing to do with whether a person is a tribal or non tribal.

Yeah, but people else where in the country don't join Maoists to stall the development process.
 
.
Yeah, but people else where in the country don't join Maoists to stall the development process.

Did I say that tribal join Maoists? Please read the post number #4
 
.
Did I say that tribal join Maoists? Please read the post number #4

Then who are these Maoists. As far as I know, the Maoist leadership is made up of educated non-Tribals especially Andhraities, while the foot soldiers are Tribals. Yes, the Tribals may have no idea who Mao is and what he stands for, but they are the one fighting the security forces killing and dying for the cause.
 
.
Then who are these Maoists. As far as I know, the Maoist leadership is made up of educated non-Tribals especially Andhraities, while the foot soldiers are Tribals. Yes, the Tribals may have no idea who Mao is and what he stands for, but they are the one fighting the security forces killing and dying for the cause.

I can say with my experience that the foot soldiers may not be predominantly tribals, but unemployed and misguided youth across the breath of the society; The youth could also be from the urban areas.
 
.
I can say with my experience that the foot soldiers may not be predominantly tribals, but unemployed and misguided youth across the breath of the society; The youth could also be from the urban areas.

Sir,

My two cents:

1. Shriman Harpoon is absolutely on the mark when he says tribals want development but do not want to sacrifice.They mostly seem to be waiting for a free lunch.Instances are galore.Look at the northeast states.All they want is more and more central grants, waivers and concessions and in return fiercely object the Indian state to harness the only thing they have-natural resouces.(Meghalaya won't let the centre mine its uranium when we have urgent need of uranium and of course it has nothing else to give but everything to take).Similar story in all other tribal areas ,not just northeast.

2. He is again absolutely on the mark when he says Maoist footsoldiers are mostly tribal.Just see on the Indian map - Maoist infested areas almost 100% overlap with tribal populated areas as was pointed by India Today,Times of India, etc.

3. So London is near Dantewara ?:azn: Cheers!
 
.
Sir,

My two cents:

1. Shriman Harpoon is absolutely on the mark when he says tribals want development but do not want to sacrifice.They mostly seem to be waiting for a free lunch.Instances are galore.Look at the northeast states.All they want is more and more central grants, waivers and concessions and in return fiercely object the Indian state to harness the only thing they have-natural resouces.(Meghalaya won't let the centre mine its uranium when we have urgent need of uranium and of course it has nothing else to give but everything to take).Similar story in all other tribal areas ,not just northeast.

2. He is again absolutely on the mark when he says Maoist footsoldiers are mostly tribal.Just see on the Indian map - Maoist infested areas almost 100% overlap with tribal populated areas as was pointed by India Today,Times of India, etc.

3. So London is near Dantewara ?:azn: Cheers!


1.If there are so much central grants why is there no development in tribal areas in India? If development would have reached the tribal areas, there would have been no Maoists
2.I am from a village near Dantewara, and I can vouch that the foot soldiers are not predominantly tribals. Although I have to agree that Maoist have succeeded in gaining sympathy from certain section of tribes
3.So what are you implying, a guy from Dantewara cannot do his MBA in London? Cheers
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom