U-571
BANNED
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2008
- Messages
- 2,747
- Reaction score
- -19
- Country
- Location
hello, i started a similar thread on a different history forum as well
my purpose is to highlight indian/south asian architectural achievement in the time period stated as ''ancient'' which starts from beginning of civilization to 500 AD
im a south asian/ indian sub continent nationalist and i believe from what i have found out that indians have always been ahead of their contemporaries in architecture, i argue that even though rome, egypt and greece boast loads of monotone architecture in large numbers, india is home to very diversified architecture and it evolved tremendously and indeginiously as opposed to some western theorists who look down and down play importance and significance of south asian architecture, i believe that indian architecture was one of the greatest if not the greatest architecture in the world.
please contribute to this thread thanks
we need to tell the world what our civilization achieved for thousands of years and we were not as cultureless and without past as european neanderthals.
today these western colonists who got civilized during industrialization boast a lot about their ''ancient architecture'' and the funny thing is, their history really begins at 1200s not sooner.
in the following link i have only shared ancient sites, but here you are free to share any pre modern non colonial architecture.
==================
when i say indian architecture is criminally unappreciated, i say it because i consider transformation of wooden architecture to the stone/brick masonry ones as a big mile stone, which india/sub continent achieved in a very ancient time, very early during birth of civilizations.
when i look up towards east and south east asia, there are hardly any surviving examples of stone built achietecture but india/south asia was blessed to have loads
this is the prime reason why india unlike many other asian countries can trace their architecture to thousands of years compared to east and south east asia especially.
i also think that india/south asia is responsible for evolution of south east asian wooden architecture into brick or stone ones, whether it be angkor wat in cambodia, bagan in myanmar, ayothaya in thailand, my son in veitnam, borobodur in indonesia, credit goes to indians/ south asians for revolutionizing their architecture and they should in part be thankful to india.
thanks
Link: http://historum.com/asian-history/1...cture-one-greatest-yet-least-appreciated.html
my purpose is to highlight indian/south asian architectural achievement in the time period stated as ''ancient'' which starts from beginning of civilization to 500 AD
im a south asian/ indian sub continent nationalist and i believe from what i have found out that indians have always been ahead of their contemporaries in architecture, i argue that even though rome, egypt and greece boast loads of monotone architecture in large numbers, india is home to very diversified architecture and it evolved tremendously and indeginiously as opposed to some western theorists who look down and down play importance and significance of south asian architecture, i believe that indian architecture was one of the greatest if not the greatest architecture in the world.
please contribute to this thread thanks
we need to tell the world what our civilization achieved for thousands of years and we were not as cultureless and without past as european neanderthals.
today these western colonists who got civilized during industrialization boast a lot about their ''ancient architecture'' and the funny thing is, their history really begins at 1200s not sooner.
in the following link i have only shared ancient sites, but here you are free to share any pre modern non colonial architecture.
==================
when i say indian architecture is criminally unappreciated, i say it because i consider transformation of wooden architecture to the stone/brick masonry ones as a big mile stone, which india/sub continent achieved in a very ancient time, very early during birth of civilizations.
when i look up towards east and south east asia, there are hardly any surviving examples of stone built achietecture but india/south asia was blessed to have loads
this is the prime reason why india unlike many other asian countries can trace their architecture to thousands of years compared to east and south east asia especially.
i also think that india/south asia is responsible for evolution of south east asian wooden architecture into brick or stone ones, whether it be angkor wat in cambodia, bagan in myanmar, ayothaya in thailand, my son in veitnam, borobodur in indonesia, credit goes to indians/ south asians for revolutionizing their architecture and they should in part be thankful to india.
thanks
Link: http://historum.com/asian-history/1...cture-one-greatest-yet-least-appreciated.html
Last edited: