What's new

Indian Navy News & Discussions

INS Jalashwa on a humanitarian assistance mission to beautiful Madagascar
ExEk8y5WgAMNY7r

Long way from home
1616605234588.png
 
No third Indian carrier, so looks like they will only have one operationally available, that too with a very limited air wing. IN was probably right in making sub a priority

For Navy, 6 nuclear-powered submarines take priority over 3rd aircraft carrier

 
No third Indian carrier, so looks like they will only have one operationally available, that too with a very limited air wing. IN was probably right in making sub a priority

For Navy, 6 nuclear-powered submarines take priority over 3rd aircraft carrier


How long would these take? 30 years?
 
From Malabar 2020(Phase 1), nice shots of INS Shivalik with the Fregat M2EM 3D radar in action,the Super Rapid Oto firing some rounds, a few seconds of Chetak ahead of HMAS Ballarat but INS Sindhuraj gets the most screen time. Also nice to see the Seaking 42B in action.
Missed INS Ranvijay with the Revathi radar firing some rounds from the main gun
 
Arihant is no match for Type 095. Type 095 has pump jet. Only if India buy Khabarovsk attack submarine can India counter Type 095.

Research a bit first before spouting off. The Arihant is a SSBN. It doesn't have to match the Type 095. Lol

Come back when the design of the SSN is clearer so you can tell how it is inferior to what the Chinese have.
 
USS Russell with the INS Sumitra
Ex6Co6XW8AEJA0I

Superb Chetak shot
Ex6CpQSWYAE33E1

The ship and the integral helo
Ex6CqGZWUAQ7QhK

Really nice shot
Credits to USN on Twitter
 
From Malabar 2020(Phase 1), nice shots of INS Shivalik with the Fregat M2EM 3D radar in action,the Super Rapid Oto firing some rounds, a few seconds of Chetak ahead of HMAS Ballarat but INS Sindhuraj gets the most screen time. Also nice to see the Seaking 42B in action.
Missed INS Ranvijay with the Revathi radar firing some rounds from the main gun
is it INS ARIHANT in the video??? 🤔🤔
 
Some great shots of the INS Talwar from Jubail, Saudi Arabia
The Atlas Elektronik ATAS system under covers on the stern
1617820945112.png

The Kashtan CIWS
1617820913045.png

Interestingly enough the sister vessels (INS Teg/INS Tarkash/INS Trikand) decided to move back to the simple and effective AK-630 radar controlled guns
DZR-5WMVMAAsLA7

INS Tarkash img with both AK 630s visible
They also carry two MR-123 Bass Tilt radars(Each can individually control 2 or more AK-630s) so redundancy is there
 
From Exercise La Perouse 2021
Indian Navy, US Navy, Aussie Navy, Japanese Navy and French Navy joint exercises
EyVq_DiXEAAbj6k

EyVq_aBXEAAeF0N

EyNhUEMWEAAl883

EyNhUEOWQAcb-kb

Images by USN/French Navy
Massive exercises with big USN LPD/French LHD also taking part
 





US Navy conducts exercise in India’s Exclusive Economic Zone without prior consent
Dinakar Peri
NEW DELHI, APRIL 09, 2021 12:40 IST
UPDATED: APRIL 09, 2021 13:30 IST

1617959818008.png

1x1_spacer.png

File photo of INS Shivalik participating in a Passage Exercise (PASSEX) with U.S. Navy's USS Theodore Rosevelt Carrier Strike Group in the eastern Indian Ocean Region. | Photo Credit: PTI

The U.S. Navy said one of its warship carried out Freedom of Navigation Operation (FONOP) in Indian EEZ.

In a rare and unusual public statement, the U.S. Navy conceded that it had violated India’s maritime policy by conducting an exercise in India’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ).

The US Navy said its warship carried out Freedom of Navigation Operation (FONOP) in Indian EEZ.

USS John Paul Jones asserted navigational rights and freedoms approximately 130 nautical miles west of the Lakshadweep Islands, inside India’s exclusive economic zone, without requesting India’s prior consent, consistent with international law,” the U.S. Navy’s 7th fleet said in a statement dated April 7.

“India requires prior consent for military exercises or manoeuvres in its exclusive economic zone or continental shelf, a claim inconsistent with international law.”

This FONOP upheld the rights, freedoms, and lawful uses of the sea recognised in international law by challenging India’s excessive maritime claims, the statement said.

“We conduct routine and regular FONOPs, as we have done in the past and will continue to in the future. FONOPs are not about one country, nor are they about making political statements,” it added.


Commenting on the development, former Navy Chief Adm. Arun Prakash said on Twitter there was an irony in it. “There is irony here. While India ratified U.N. Law of the Seas in 1995, the U.S. has failed to do it so far. For the 7th Fleet to carry out FoN missions in Indian EEZ in violation of our domestic law is bad enough. But publicising it? USN please switch on IFF (Identification, friend or foe)!,” he said in a tweet.

The U.S. regularly conducts FONOPs against several countries challenging what it says are “excessive maritime claims” and FONOPs were regularly conducted against India too in the past.





EWS | April 7, 2021
7th Fleet conducts Freedom of Navigation Operation
By U.S. 7th Fleet Public Affairs
Philippine Sea, –
On April 7, 2021 (local time) USS John Paul Jones (DDG 53) asserted navigational rights and freedoms approximately 130 nautical miles west of the Lakshadweep Islands, inside India’s exclusive economic zone, without requesting India’s prior consent, consistent with international law. India requires prior consent for military exercises or maneuvers in its exclusive economic zone or continental shelf, a claim inconsistent with international law. This freedom of navigation operation (“FONOP”) upheld the rights, freedoms, and lawful uses of the sea recognized in international law by challenging India’s excessive maritime claims.
U.S. Forces operate in the Indo-Pacific region on a daily basis. All operations are designed in accordance with international law and demonstrate that the United States will fly, sail and operate wherever international law allows.
We conduct routine and regular Freedom of Navigation Operations (FONOPs), as we have done in the past and will continue to in the future. FONOPs are not about one country, nor are they about making political statements.


@Areesh @FOOLS_NIGHTMARE @HalfMoon @Dalit
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom