What's new

Indian Military allowed to Use Firearms at LAC

S.U.R.B.

PDF THINK TANK: ANALYST
Joined
Jan 31, 2010
Messages
2,741
Reaction score
10
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
As per the border agreement signed between the two countries in 1996 and 2005, both sides had agreed not to use firearms within two kilometres of the LAC.

The clash in Galwan Valley was the biggest confrontation between the Indian and Chinese troops since the agreement was signed.It has brought a change in the rules of engagement from the Indian side.


Some of the Ex. Indian Army servicemen were seen on media asking the GOI to get rid of any such agreement signalling aggression in their camps.Well now they have got what they wanted.
 
So India has just unilaterally abrogated a bilateral agreement regarding border region RoE made with China? Are they mad?

Do they not realise that this will cause a massive mobilisation at the LAC?

It's also inconsistent with the narrative they're trying to create regarding Galwan (that China was "beaten back"). If India won the encounter, why would India need to change the RoE?
 
As per the border agreement signed between the two countries in 1996 and 2005, both sides had agreed not to use firearms within two kilometres of the LAC.

The clash in Galwan Valley was the biggest confrontation between the Indian and Chinese troops since the agreement was signed.It has brought a change in the rules of engagement from the Indian side.


Some of the Ex. Indian Army servicemen were seen on media asking the GOI to get rid of any such agreement signalling aggression in their camps.Well now they have got what they wanted.


shoot then, talking like only Indians have weapons,

PLA soldiers are not weaponless unarmed Kashmir civilians
 
Last edited:
yet more posturing from pussies, I wish the Indians start using firearms


As per the border agreement signed between the two countries in 1996 and 2005, both sides had agreed not to use firearms within two kilometres of the LAC.

The clash in Galwan Valley was the biggest confrontation between the Indian and Chinese troops since the agreement was signed.It has brought a change in the rules of engagement from the Indian side.


Some of the Ex. Indian Army servicemen were seen on media asking the GOI to get rid of any such agreement signalling aggression in their camps.Well now they have got what they wanted.
 
As per the border agreement signed between the two countries in 1996 and 2005, both sides had agreed not to use firearms within two kilometres of the LAC.

The clash in Galwan Valley was the biggest confrontation between the Indian and Chinese troops since the agreement was signed.It has brought a change in the rules of engagement from the Indian side.


Some of the Ex. Indian Army servicemen were seen on media asking the GOI to get rid of any such agreement signalling aggression in their camps.Well now they have got what they wanted.
Indians will lose more troops in the next confrontation. Idiots.
 
yay! "gamechanger" now. Indians always have rules to blame for their blunder. Its not that they cannot manufacture their environment laws prevent them, its not as if they cant organize labor their labor laws prevent the. Only they believe in this delusion.
 
Face saving meetings and tweet by Indians nothing much more.
Pakistan GOV risked whole country by shooting indian jets and were ready for any consequence,on indian side days has been passed but Indians just talking big,we will do that and this, will order jets and doom china but nothing as usual.
Sanghis on here deeply knows inside that indian gov and army is pussy.sanghis has serious problem and rare disease called superiority complex which force them to defend India no matter china capture whole Indian land they will celebrate victory.
 
These indian dipsticks are making one mistake after another. By allowing their soldiers to carry weapons, they have ensured that now the Chinese will carry weapons as well - any weapon ! :lol: The idiots literally have asked the Chinese to massacre them. How dumb do you have to be not to understand this? :lol:
 
Back
Top Bottom