Kazhugu
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- May 7, 2011
- Messages
- 2,128
- Reaction score
- 0
If you believe that I or anyone else must vote for a corrupt person simply because he belongs to the BJP, then I'm afraid it is your compass that is twisted. In any case, I will vote on parameters decided by me & you will do so on yours. It is a very odd logic that believes that Modi will run a corruption free government on the backs of the support of corrupt people.
why not ? after all both are corrupt (according to you) though admittedly NDA is seen as lesser of two evils....... in the case of UPA, the head is also rotten....while in case of NDA atleast Modi is clean and decisive and there are no allegations of corruption even against most of their senior leadership.....and UPA has already effed up two terms.....so naturally, if one votes on basis of governance and perfomance, the choice this time should logically be NDA.....if not, then its clear that its not perfomance and integrity that is the deciding factor, but other idealogical reasons in which case the whole point of not voting for BJP because they did not perform is moot........see ultimately its ur choice...no two views about that.....but just that if someone claims to vote on basis of perfomance then the scale must be consistent both in state and central elections.....
That is a never ending argument. It could be argued that the NDA were reaping the benefits of the actions of the Congress government of PV Narsimha Rao. The NDA did do very well during the Vajpayee years but credit also goes to UPA1.
.
no..most of the divestment, liberalization were specifically started during the NDA regime...nothing from narasimha rao regime....allmost all the good work from pvnr regime were messed up in three years of third front rule......